Jump to content

Time to start talking the f word


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure you bring up Gausman, what about Matusz and Hobgood smart guy?

Drafts are crapshoots, even at the top. Heck, KG is easily the second most-accomplished player (as of today, at least, could always change in the future) in the Top 10 picks of the 2012 draft.

No. 1 is obviously Carlos Correa. The rest of the Top 10? Byron Buxton, Mike Zunino, Kyle Zimmer, Albert Almora, Max Fried, Mark Appel, Andrew Heaney, David Dahl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Drafts are crapshoots, even at the top. Heck, KG is easily the second most-accomplished player (as of today, at least, could always change in the future) in the Top 10 picks of the 2012 draft.

No. 1 is obviously Carlos Correa. The rest of the Top 10? Byron Buxton, Mike Zunino, Kyle Zimmer, Albert Almora, Max Fried, Mark Appel, Andrew Heaney, David Dahl.

Yea but the first round also had the likes of Addison Russell and Corey Seager.

Sure it's a crapshoot, but the Orioles hit far less frequently on a year to year basis. If they decide to tank, tell me how confident you are that they won't miss like they did in 1999 and end up losing 90-95 games with a farm system devoid of any help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Drafts are crapshoots, even at the top. Heck, KG is easily the second most-accomplished player (as of today, at least, could always change in the future) in the Top 10 picks of the 2012 draft.

No. 1 is obviously Carlos Correa. The rest of the Top 10? Byron Buxton, Mike Zunino, Kyle Zimmer, Albert Almora, Max Fried, Mark Appel, Andrew Heaney, David Dahl.

Yes they are crapshoots but there were a ton of red flags all over Hobgood.  The only think that makes the pick in any way justifiable was that he signed for underslot and they spent a total of 8.8 million that draft (A couple million of which went to overslots that didn't pan out). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JohnD said:

Yea but the first round also had the likes of Addison Russell and Corey Seager.

Sure it's a crapshoot, but the Orioles hit far less frequently on a year to year basis. If they decide to tank, tell me how confident you are that they won't miss like they did in 1999 and end up losing 90-95 games with a farm system devoid of any help?

The Orioles weren't the only team to pass on those guys. Was every scouting department just awful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes they are crapshoots but there were a ton of red flags all over Hobgood.  The only think that makes the pick in any way justifiable was that he signed for underslot and they spent a total of 8.8 million that draft (A couple million of which went to overslots that didn't pan out). 

Do you have a link to any of the pre-draft concerns on Hobgood? No one was really mocking him to the O's, but he was essentially a consensus first-round pick, and draft sites were calling him a potential front of the rotation arm.

He's also far from the only swing and a miss in that Top 5. Seen Donovan Tate lately? He's going to play quarterback for the Arizona Wildcats this fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JohnD said:

Yea but the first round also had the likes of Addison Russell and Corey Seager.

Sure it's a crapshoot, but the Orioles hit far less frequently on a year to year basis. If they decide to tank, tell me how confident you are that they won't miss like they did in 1999 and end up losing 90-95 games with a farm system devoid of any help?

 

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes they are crapshoots but there were a ton of red flags all over Hobgood.  The only think that makes the pick in any way justifiable was that he signed for underslot and they spent a total of 8.8 million that draft (A couple million of which went to overslots that didn't pan out). 

Further, the FO is rather different than it was in 2009... and especially 1999. Better? Don't know. I have no idea what's really going on behind the scenes. But it's not the same people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlipTheBird said:

Do you have a link to any of the pre-draft concerns on Hobgood? No one was really mocking him to the O's, but he was essentially a consensus first-round pick, and draft sites were calling him a potential front of the rotation arm.

He's also far from the only swing and a miss in that Top 5. Seen Donovan Tate lately? He's going to play quarterback for the Arizona Wildcats this fall.

He was a helium guy that was projected to go somewhere around 22.  I have no pre-draft info on him since I hadn't heard of him before the draft.

You go back to that thread and you will see the reaction myself and others had to the pick.

As for front of the rotation, what I remember reading was he might develop into a #3 guy, which is not what I want to hear when discussing the ceiling of a HS pitcher taken in the top five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FlipTheBird said:

The Orioles weren't the only team to pass on those guys. Was every scouting department just awful?

Do you want to compare the Orioles scouting record with other teams?  Because the quantifiable results are not very friendly to our points of view.

Look I'm not against a rebuild.  My point is the current regime doesn't have a great record of finding impact talent to rebuild with.  I'm not wrong here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JohnD said:

You sure?  Kevin Gausman was a top 5 draft pick.

That puts a lot of faith in a scouting department that has a lot of swings and misses.

Gausman has already almost reached the average career value for a top-5 pick.

 

I think we have drafted well the past few years considering we lost 3 high round picks by signing qualified offer recipients and traded away 3 competitive balance slots.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, JohnD said:

Do you want to compare the Orioles scouting record with other teams?  Because the quantifiable results are not very friendly to our points of view.

Look I'm not against a rebuild.  My point is the current regime doesn't have a great record of finding impact talent to rebuild with.  I'm not wrong here.

The current regime has never tried to rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Gausman has already almost reached the average career value for a top-5 pick.

 

I think we have drafted well the past few years considering we lost 3 high round picks by signing qualified offer recipients and traded away 3 competitive balance slots.  

It's far too early to evaluate the past few year's drafts.

And, of course, we had Hunter Harvey, who was very well regarded... and he got hurt. You can't control that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...