Jump to content

Is Gausman a bust?


JohnD

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, thatbearflies said:

I shared your reaction, to be honest. I didn't feel like he owned his performance enough. I was expecting the usual, "what went wrong?" "Fastball command." But when he said, "just some bad luck," and "I wouldn't take back a single pitch." Even if you executed the pitches in the spots that you wanted them, you don't think some of the pitch choices were poor? I understand that you can't allow yourself to be consumed and dragged down by a poor performance, but if you just shrug this off (at least publicly) my concern is that you are not going to learn. 

"Just some bad luck"???  "Wouldn't take back a single pitch"???   How about throwing that stupid curve ball on 1-2 with the bases loaded that hits a guy who absolutely had whiffed at every outside pitch you had thrown??  How about that pitch, Kev?   Huh?    He is a knucklehead.   The fact is when truly great pitchers have bad breaks, like an error or something, they just uniformly get nastier.   Bob Gibson?  Never talked about luck.  Pedro Martinez, Greg Maddux, Randy Johnson...what made them different was not their physical talents, because Gausman has just as much if not more than any of them, but their mental makeup and their ability to translate their mental ideas into physical action.   Kevin may figure it out one day, but more likely he will not and will become one of many who settle for achievements which are better than the majority but that are actually far short of their abilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
53 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

"Just some bad luck"???  "Wouldn't take back a single pitch"???   How about throwing that stupid curve ball on 1-2 with the bases loaded that hits a guy who absolutely had whiffed at every outside pitch you had thrown??  How about that pitch, Kev?   Huh?    He is a knucklehead.   The fact is when truly great pitchers have bad breaks, like an error or something, they just uniformly get nastier.   Bob Gibson?  Never talked about luck.  Pedro Martinez, Greg Maddux, Randy Johnson...what made them different was not their physical talents, because Gausman has just as much if not more than any of them, but their mental makeup and their ability to translate their mental ideas into physical action.   Kevin may figure it out one day, but more likely he will not and will become one of many who settle for achievements which are better than the majority but that are actually far short of their abilities. 

Speaking of bob Gibson, "A curve ball is not something you can pick up overnight. It took me years to perfect mine."

?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What made Pedro and Johnson different was their physical talent. Gausman doesn't have more and certainly it isn't as rare. Guys see 95 in single A now, these days a 99 mph fb is nothing if someone is looking for it and it's not well located. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

He probably had it down perfect in 1968.   11.2 WAR in that season alone.  1.12 ERA.  268 Ks in 304 innings.  ERA+ of 258 and WHIP of 0.853.  

He was probably 32 years old. Not the best point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Cumberbundy said:

He was probably 32 years old. Not the best point. 

Speaking of Bob Gibson, he also said..."My pitching philosophy is simple. I believe in getting the ball over the plate and not walking a lot of men."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really only consider busts to be players who never make it to the majors, but should have. Your Billy Rowells.

Is Tillman a bust? Gausman has a career so far pretty similar to Chris. Capable of 3.30ERA, susceptible to a 5.00ERA when something isn't working right.

This seems like the classic Matt Wieters fallacy-- didn't live up to the hype and therefore is a complete failure. Also willing to close the book on a dude who is 26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, El Gordo said:

Too often he gets ahead two strikes and can't finishe them of. That's on him despite the defense.

This. The number of times he's gotten ahead and hung a breaking ball or left a fastball in the zone is crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • This Oriole team has much better talent.  Gunner Henderson, Jordan Westberg, Adley, Santander, Grayson, and Corbin Burnes don’t have a 4-32 streak in them.  Even if they fill the rest of the positions with OH posters.  I think a rotation of Burnes, Grayson, and Kremer as your top 3 is a better than 500 team the rest of the way at least.  The jury is out on Povich but if he pitches as well as he has the Orioles with this offense will have a good chance to win when he starts.  Is the team good enough to win it all?  They need help most likely.  One consistent starter and a couple of better arms in the bullpen.  This team is going to the playoffs.  To think they are not at this point is based on emotion and not anything else.  
    • It’s funny that people are wanting to bring back Tanner Scott and his 6.1 walk rate, but balking at McDermott and his 5.5 walk rate. I’m leery of McDermott too, but as they say, “any port in a storm,” so no reason not to give him a try.
    • It sort of makes no sense, his GB% is much higher than last year but his HR/FB went from 10% last year to 26% this year. Walks are way up too.
    • Suarez and Irvin were always going to regress. You didn’t think they would be sub 3 ERA pitchers did you?  Irvin is a solid guy for the back of the rotation but that’s what he is, a back of rotation guy. They are pieces you need to eat innings and keep you in most games but these aren’t world beaters on the mound. Suarez is a good story but there is a reason he has had the career he has had. The fear that we will slowly sink is an unfounded and irrational fear. The team has to get better and they have to improve on obvious needs but we don’t need to go overboard here.  All teams have holes they need to address.
    • Good point.  Every now and then he looks like vintage Cano from early last year but he’s no longer trustworthy.
    • Speaking of scar tissue, a review of our storied/checkered past shows an uglier picture than we like to recall... St. Louis Browns 1902-1953: 52 years, 1 WS (1944), loss. Baltimore Orioles 1954-1983: 30 years, 6 WS (3-3), plus 2 more ALCS losses. Orioles 1984-2023: 40 years, 6 playoffs losses (1 WC, 2 ALDS, 3 ALCS).
    • Cano is having an awful season. He's been worth -0.3 fWAR with a 4.62 FIP. I know you have to use the arms you have, but you can't utilize Cano like it's 2023, he's terrible and should be the lowest-leverage reliever out of the pen right now. He's carrying the same BABIP as last year, but his results are awful.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...