Jump to content

O's in discussions with Cubs, Almora Jr appears to be the target.


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

True, but at the time, PA wouldn't go over 3 years and over 10mil per year for SP.

I have to be honest, I read that Darvish is expected to get 5/150, which is crazy.

IMO, I have a hard time pay any pitcher that kind of money.

Thankfully, I am not in charge. :)

These modern players should erect monuments and temples to Curt Flood and Marvin Miller.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Why make this move when you have Hays, Mullins, Stewart, Santander and Mancini? Go for pitching with the cubs 

I think because Santander and Stewart aren't exactly good outfielders by any stretch. Santander has health issues. 

Mancini is just Trumbo Part 2 (a younger Trumbo, of course) - see a below average defensive outfielder with an above average bat.

So that leaves Hays and Mullins. I'm not sold on Mullins.

I like Austin Hays. An OF of Hays, Jones and Almora would work well. It would require Mancini to go to DH and for Duquette to find a salary dump partner for Trumbo.

Which I dig. This club has been incredibly short sighted with this barrage of DHs masquerading as outfielders for years now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookitsPuck said:

I think because Santander and Stewart aren't exactly good outfielders by any stretch. Santander has health issues. 

Mancini is just Trumbo Part 2 (a younger Trumbo, of course) - see a below average defensive outfielder with an above average bat.

So that leaves Hays and Mullins. I'm not sold on Mullins.

I like Austin Hays. An OF of Hays, Jones and Almora would work well. It would require Mancini to go to DH and for Duquette to find a salary dump partner for Trumbo.

Which I dig. This club has been incredibly short sighted with this barrage of DHs masquerading as outfielders for years now

Better that, than guys like De Aza and Parra, who was neither DH or OF material. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I couldnt remember any, found this article from 2014 and it list 5 trades, and twice Jason Hammel was involved.

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/a-brief-history-of-spring-training-trades/

To me, the Guthrie for Hammel and Lindstrom trade doesn’t count as a spring training trade, as it took place on Feb. 6, before pitchers and catchers reported.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LookitsPuck said:

I think because Santander and Stewart aren't exactly good outfielders by any stretch. Santander has health issues. 

Mancini is just Trumbo Part 2 (a younger Trumbo, of course) - see a below average defensive outfielder with an above average bat.

So that leaves Hays and Mullins. I'm not sold on Mullins.

I like Austin Hays. An OF of Hays, Jones and Almora would work well. It would require Mancini to go to DH and for Duquette to find a salary dump partner for Trumbo.

Which I dig. This club has been incredibly short sighted with this barrage of DHs masquerading as outfielders for years now. 

Huh?

Where did you get this from?

The fact that his arm only allows him to play left?

Doesn't take much of a "stretch" at all to see that the metrics were rather kind to Stewart's outfield defense this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Huh?

Where did you get this from?

The fact that his arm only allows him to play left?

Doesn't take much of a "stretch" at all to see that the metrics were rather kind to Stewart's outfield defense this year.

It's likely that he is an above average MLB left fielder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Trading away Jones and Britton wouldn't be rebuilding.  It was just be reallocating resources.  Relievers and OF's are actually two positions that we have prospect options, plus they're real close to being MLB ready.  We'd be in a much better position to compete next year with spending our money on top notch FA SP, rather than having it tied up in areas where we have some internal options.  

As of right now, we have the worst MLB SP's in baseball.  Adding FA's like Garcia and Doug Fister isn't going to move that needle enough.  We need to clear some money and go get Darvish.  Accept the fact that the farm is empty with MLB options for realistically the next two years.  Buy the arms, grow the bats.  

I slightly disagree here.  I think if we can add some average-ish pitchers we will be in a good spot.  Guasman and Bundy are a good 1/2.  We don't necessarily need an ace, we just need to replace the negative production we got from guys like Ubaldo with something decent at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...