Jump to content

Should the Orioles sign Lance Lynn?


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Diehard_O's_Fan said:

The chances of Alex Cobb signing with the Cubs appears to be very high. According to mlbtraderumors.com, he could sign with the Cubs by Monday. Should the Orioles focus their attention on Lance Lynn? Would he be a good signing for the Orioles?

I say yes. I think he would be good for the O's. But DD won't sign him or any other top pitcher. Angelos and DD go for low tier pitchers that no other team wants. IMO 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
12 hours ago, tntoriole said:

After the events of the last week or so, namely seeing that the available free agent pitching is going to be outrageously overpriced and that the Yankees are going to be stacked and that the Red Sox are likely to strike hard too,  I just cannot get enthused any longer about the "going for it."   They can sign a tremendously overpriced Lance Lynn and finish fourth rather than fifth and get to .500 rather than 10 games under.   But, really, who cares?    This team needed to sell last winter and needs even more desperately to sell this winter,  take its lumps in 2018 and try to move forward.  Otherwise we are looking at being in the hole for another decade.    Pox on any of the available free agent pitchers.  

Of course but you know Angelos is not going to do that. But hell I want the FO to have team to at least try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Does the price of the pitching really surprise you?    Chatwood was on the high side, but not crazy.    I always expect pitching prices to be high.  Some of the earlier estimates I saw were ridiculously low.

It doesn't surprise me, no.  But I think this reality again has to sink into the general public fanbase so that the MASN articles about us pursuing guys like Lynn and Cobb can morph into "well, the Orioles really pursued them, but the market was just soooo costly this year that the Orioles are waiting for it to settle a bit."  Meaning Miggy and Tillman, here we come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, connja said:

Orioles will wait until all the decent pitchers are off the table, feign surprise at the cost of pitching, and end up resigning a bunch of junk for 80% of what it would have cost for good pitching.

And BTW, I would absolutely sign Lynn.  And Cobb.  Would have loved Chatwood at that price also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I'd sign Lynn for 2 years, but I think someone will give him 3 or 4 years. That wouldn't be a sound investment for team in flux like the Orioles. 

It’s academic, because Lynn will be offered more than two years by several teams, so if we have interest in him, two years is going to be a non-starter.    

I think I’m done discussing what I think the O’s should do.    I’ll be shocked if Cobb, Lynn and several other of the top pitchers remain on the market this time next week.    The O’s can either address their pitching needs, or pay lip service to it and apply band-aids to a gaping wound.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...