Jump to content

After Trading Machado...


Dark Helmet

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

and yet another thread for Manny. :)

He hasn't been traded, yet.

Yes, I know, he most likely will, but not going to count that bridge, until I see it.

Roch has this to say:

A lot of tire kicking going on thats for sure, but I suspect teams will wait a season and then go after him.

It's not a Manny thread...its an after Manny thread, whether he is traded or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
58 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

If your doing a full rebuild, then you almost have to extend DD or wait until a new GM takes over. I don't want a guy entering his last year as GM making decisions that can affect the Orioles multiple years from now.

I think its a little bit silly to assume that since DD is in the last year of his contract - he doesn't care about doing a good job. He's a professional. And he obviously wouldn't want to pull off a bunch of bad deals, as that would affect his ability to get a new gig in 2019. Managers and GM's have "contract years" just like players, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theocean said:

I think its a little bit silly to assume that since DD is in the last year of his contract - he doesn't care about doing a good job. He's a professional. And he obviously wouldn't want to pull off a bunch of bad deals, as that would affect his ability to get a new gig in 2019. Managers and GM's have "contract years" just like players, too.

When he was all but gone to Toronto, did he do a good job during that fiasco?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

When he was all but gone to Toronto, did he do a good job during that fiasco?

I think he tried his best.   He took some calculated risks — as he’s done every year — and they didn’t pan out, but I think his plan was reasonable.    I’ve never bought the idea that he mailed it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Frobby said:

They could go many directions.    But it increases the likelihood they listen to offers for other players with 1-2 years remaining on their deals.   

 

Maybe.

Or they may feel that the rest of the nucleus, plus guys coming up on the farm, plus whatever talent they get back for Manny... forms a nucleus that they can win with, and maybe they extend guys like Schoop that they feel are key parts of that.

I just wish they would be proactive with extending young, talented guys.   They  missed the boat with Manny, but it might not be too late for Schoop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, theocean said:

I think its a little bit silly to assume that since DD is in the last year of his contract - he doesn't care about doing a good job. He's a professional. And he obviously wouldn't want to pull off a bunch of bad deals, as that would affect his ability to get a new gig in 2019. Managers and GM's have "contract years" just like players, too.

A professional who during his contract tried bolting to another team? A guy in his last year cares about W/L. And he's already pulled off a bunch of bad deals over his tenure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Maybe.

Or they may feel that the rest of the nucleus, plus guys coming up on the farm, plus whatever talent they get back for Manny... forms a nucleus that they can win with, and maybe they extend guys like Schoop that they feel are key parts of that.

I just wish they would be proactive with extending young, talented guys.   They  missed the boat with Manny, but it might not be too late for Schoop.

I think this has to be the winter they extend Schoop. Probably going to take something like 7/80ish million. I may even be light on that. But another season close to last, and you can double that atleast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't blame the Orioles for not wanting to enter into 10 yr/300+ million dollar deals with anybody. What I do blame them for is not being proactive to avoid these situations. Machado should have been traded after the 2016 season if a team friendly deal could not be reached. Same with Britton. If you can't get a nice contract agreed to with Schoop, then you trade him right now. What you do not do is hold onto them until there value is reduced and them trade them for a reduced return. At this point, we have no choice but to trade Machado and Britton for pennies on the dollar. Hopefully, those turn out to be shiny pennies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dark Helmet said:

If your doing a full rebuild, then you almost have to extend DD or wait until a new GM takes over. I don't want a guy entering his last year as GM making decisions that can affect the Orioles multiple years from now.

Part of the process to identify what players should stay or go... is to see what management should stay or go, ideally first.  DD isn't my first choice to head a rebuild, especially if he has no stake in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dark Helmet said:

I think this has to be the winter they extend Schoop. Probably going to take something like 7/80ish million. I may even be light on that. But another season close to last, and you can double that atleast.

#1 priority in my book if the Orioles close on the Manny trade this week.  It's Manny redux, really.  But Schoop will not require near the kind of money Manny will.  Still a lot of money, but not 300+ k.  Probably more like Davis' numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, AlbionHero said:

I think if we trade Manny, a bigger sell off is gonna happen. Don't really see the reason to keep around other pending free agents with value like Britton, Brach and Jones if Manny is gone.

If they decide to trade him, hopefully they'll try and move Britton and Brach first.  They've been talking with potential trade partners for a long time for both of them so they know the market.  

I'm afraid if Manny goes first then the "fire sale" word goes out and they get low-balled on Britton and Brach.  No one is low-balling on Manny so there's less of a worry there.

That said, I want them to pay Manny and trade Brach.  Trade Britton if it's a great deal or otherwise hold him until the deadline to see how the team is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

The guy with the EVP title in Baltimore should just be known as Executive Assistant to the Managing Partner. And/or to his sons.

Dont forget the dotted line BB reporting that brings Buck and Brady into the mix.

 

It's sort of like Executive Assistant to the Managing Partner (and/or his sons)  But sorta like the UN where Buck and Brady have the power to execute or block moves, for certain reasons, at certain times, for certain occasions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I mean Adley’s attempted hit vs Witt is a good example. Adley hit it harder…but missed for a few feet. That happens. But even softly hit balls find green…the Os aren’t..others are…like Detroit..like KC vs us. They win on an IF hit, Westburg’s ball is a homer in 28 of 30 parks.   
    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...