Jump to content

How Confident Should We Be that Hays & Stewart > Matos & Bigbie?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Matos & Bigbie

Young & Gerhart

Are our current promising outfielders more likely to reach their promise than those promising outfielders of the past who crashed and burned?

Someone reassure me, please.

different players, very different management in the organization.   The guy we should have kept who was on the same Orioles top prospect list in 2000 as Luis Matos  was our number 4 prospect in 2000... Jayson Werth.   Perhaps our promising outfielders will turn out more like him if we hang on to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Matos & Bigbie

Young & Gerhart

Are our current promising outfielders more likely to reach their promise than those promising outfielders of the past who crashed and burned?

Someone reassure me, please.

 

PEDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither Matos nor Bigbie was as highly regarded as Hays when they were in the minors.     Matos was a career .719 OPS hitter in the minors.   Bigbie was better — .791 — and maybe you could argue he was comparable to Stewart (he was, after all, the no. 21 overall pick).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...