Jump to content

Is Dan Waiting on Machado Before Doing Anything Else?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, foxfield said:

So, I will ask a follow up...If Peter is not meddling, is it fair to say he has done a poor job of stacking advisors who can intellectually agree on a direction and work together to achieve it?

I have to disagree with Connolly that listening to a room full of advisers and making decisions based on their opinions somehow =/= meddling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, joeyc said:

Then we will be offered even less. The closer Manny gets to free agency, the less teams will be willing to give up for a few month rental. The Whitesox would no longer be interested because there opportunity to sign him long term will be greatly reduced.

This needs to get done now.

Manny doesn't get any closer to free agency between today and opening day.  So, why does it have to get done "now" versus tomorrow or Wednesday if those days result in a better deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone is glossing over the main point in Connolly's piece.  Everyone now agrees that Manny should be traded.  To the point that even a trade to the Yankees may be possible if it's the best deal on the table.  That's the take away, not the history crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I think everyone is glossing over the main point in Connolly's piece.  Everyone now agrees that Manny should be traded.  To the point that even a trade to the Yankees may be possible if it's the best deal on the table.  That's the take away, not the history crap.

That’s fine but what if one of his advisors does not like the deal? Then what? 

History has a way of repeating itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, foxfield said:

So, I will ask a follow up...If Peter is not meddling, is it fair to say he has done a poor job of stacking advisors who can intellectually agree on a direction and work together to achieve it?

Yes, he’s done a poor job. There’s no excuse for not letting Duquette make these decisions and have him take responsibility for them. Whether you love him or hate him Duquette is the guy Angelos hired to make those decisions. If he doesn’t do the job you get someone else.

There’s no accountability. Having a myriad of counselors to which the owner sifts through bypasses the point of of even having one guy in charge of baseball decisions, including roster construction and payroll.

If Angelos hasn’t meddled he’s certainly made it no easier on the people in the chain of command.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I agree. I think his time has come. He deserves a chance.

I hope Brady gets a chance at somepoint with this team and does well.

For everybody on the dislike DD page, keep in mind, replacing DD, doesn't mean, you get a better GM, either.

We have had many far worse here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do I get the feeling Buck pulls the end-around on Duquette? Exhibit A, Chris Davis. It almost seems like he and Angelos work on the bigger deals without Duquette. Duquette is there for the scrap-heap deals. I wonder if they even let him sit at the grown-ups table or if he is relegated to the kiddies table.

And if Angelos has this inner circle of folks he trusts, why haven't any of those cracking good baseball minds made him see the light on opt-outs, the international draft, the posting system, the importance of good starting pitchers (sure, it's scary and it very well might not work but investing in Yovani Gallardo is never the right answer) and that trades for prospects are sometimes OK too. I get the impression Petah likes major league players coming back to the Orioles in deals of any consequence.

Didn't the Rangers have some pitching prospects that could have been part of the Koji Uehara deal but Andy MacPhail (because of Angelos?) chose Tommy Hunter and Chris Davis ... two players who had been up in the majors. Granted, I don't think anything became of the prospects, but I still get the impression Angelos tries to avoid prospect deals. Probably because, in his mind, no one has heard of the players. I could see him favoring RZNJ's scenario of Michael Wacha and Jed Gyorko as two pieces for Machado ... hey, those are major leaguers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rockford said:

Why do I get the feeling Buck pulls the end-around on Duquette? Exhibit A, Chris Davis. It almost seems like he and Angelos work on the bigger deals without Duquette. Duquette is there for the scrap-heap deals. I wonder if they even let him sit at the grown-ups table or if he is relegated to the kiddies table.

And if Angelos has this inner circle of folks he trusts, why haven't any of those cracking good baseball minds made him see the light on opt-outs, the international draft, the posting system, the importance of good starting pitchers (sure, it's scary and it very well might not work but investing in Yovani Gallardo is never the right answer) and that trades for prospects are sometimes OK too. I get the impression Petah likes major league players coming back to the Orioles in deals of any consequence.

Didn't the Rangers have some pitching prospects that could have been part of the Koji Uehara deal but Andy MacPhail (because of Angelos?) chose Tommy Hunter and Chris Davis ... two players who had been up in the majors. Granted, I don't think anything became of the prospects, but I still get the impression Angelos tries to avoid prospect deals. Probably because, in his mind, no one has heard of the players. I could see him favoring RZNJ's scenario of Michael Wacha and Jed Gyorko as two pieces for Machado ... hey, those are major leaguers!

While we don’t know for sure how these decisions take place, I’d be willing to bet that you are more right than wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...