Jump to content

PressBox: D.J. Stewart Thinks He Could Help


weams

Recommended Posts

Not putting much stock in his .940 OPS based on 27 plate appearances.    However, at least he’s not looking overmatched.    Put it this way, he’s putting himself in the mix for a spot on the OD roster even though he had a mediocre year at Norfolk.    And you know the guy will have patient at bats, something we haven’t seen a lot around here.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Not putting much stock in his .940 OPS based on 27 plate appearances.    However, at least he’s not looking overmatched.    Put it this way, he’s putting himself in the mix for a spot on the OD roster even though he had a mediocre year at Norfolk.    And you know the guy will have patient at bats, something we haven’t seen a lot around here.   

He probably has the best idea of the strike zone on the team. He hasn't produced the types of exit velocities I'd like to see from a corner only guy yet though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Not putting much stock in his .940 OPS based on 27 plate appearances.    However, at least he’s not looking overmatched.    Put it this way, he’s putting himself in the mix for a spot on the OD roster even though he had a mediocre year at Norfolk.    And you know the guy will have patient at bats, something we haven’t seen a lot around here.   

I think his odds will be better without Buck being here.  Buck doesn't seem to value this type of skill set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

He probably has the best idea of the strike zone on the team. He hasn't produced the types of exit velocities I'd like to see from a corner only guy yet though.

I'm not expecting big things from him but I do think he will be an upgrade from Mancini and can hold down a job for a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not expecting big things from him but I do think he will be an upgrade from Mancini and can hold down a job for a few years.

What I’m hoping for is a .275/.365/.445 type profile with an occasional stolen base, lots of 8-10 pitch at bats, and respectable outfield defense.    I think Mancini has more power and can hit for as high or higher average, but he’ll get on base less and isn’t as good a defender.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

What I’m hoping for is a .275/.365/.445 type profile with an occasional stolen base, lots of 8-10 pitch at bats, and respectable outfield defense.    I think Mancini has more power and can hit for as high or higher average, but he’ll get on base less and isn’t as good a defender.   

From Stewart, I would take Seth Smith's platoon bat with better outfield defense any day of the week. That would be a very respectable career and a solid player for any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What I’m hoping for is a .275/.365/.445 type profile with an occasional stolen base, lots of 8-10 pitch at bats, and respectable outfield defense.    I think Mancini has more power and can hit for as high or higher average, but he’ll get on base less and isn’t as good a defender.   

I think you are a bit high on both of them.

Mancini does have more power of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s long been my observation that having a hitters park in AA and a pitchers park in AAA has stunted the development of our position prospects. DJ seems to be an example of a guy with skills who struggled more in AAA than one would expect. Sisco comes to mind, as do a number of guys over the years who showed promise in Bowie and with the Orioles, but couldn’t extract themselves from Norfolk. I’d like to see changes in the fields at those two stops that smooth out those imbalances. I’d dig into more examples if I had time, but if it hasn’t been done that would be a good thing to analyze. Developing prospects is partly about building their confidence. Sending Machado to AAA would have seemed logical in his development, but we didn’t want to hinder his rapid development by sending him there. The same holds true for mortal prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think you are a bit high on both of them.

Mancini does have more power of course.

I’m talking about what I’m realistically hoping for, not necessarily what I think their midrange expectation is.   I said before the year started that I thought Mancini would settle in as a .770-.780 OPS guy, and now his career slash line is .268/.319/.458, which is just about in line with what I expect.   Basically, he’s a RH Mitch Moreland, maybe a hair better.   But I’m hoping for a little more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

It’s long been my observation that having a hitters park in AA and a pitchers park in AAA has stunted the development of our position prospects. DJ seems to be an example of a guy with skills who struggled more in AAA than one would expect. Sisco comes to mind, as do a number of guys over the years who showed promise in Bowie and with the Orioles, but couldn’t extract themselves from Norfolk. I’d like to see changes in the fields at those two stops that smooth out those imbalances. I’d dig into more examples if I had time, but if it hasn’t been done that would be a good thing to analyze. Developing prospects is partly about building their confidence. Sending Machado to AAA would have seemed logical in his development, but we didn’t want to hinder his rapid development by sending him there. The same holds true for mortal prospects. 

They had a huge need at the ML level so they promoted him.  If that need hadn't been present Machado probably would have spent the rest of the year in Bowie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

It’s long been my observation that having a hitters park in AA and a pitchers park in AAA has stunted the development of our position prospects. DJ seems to be an example of a guy with skills who struggled more in AAA than one would expect. Sisco comes to mind, as do a number of guys over the years who showed promise in Bowie and with the Orioles, but couldn’t extract themselves from Norfolk. I’d like to see changes in the fields at those two stops that smooth out those imbalances. I’d dig into more examples if I had time, but if it hasn’t been done that would be a good thing to analyze. Developing prospects is partly about building their confidence. Sending Machado to AAA would have seemed logical in his development, but we didn’t want to hinder his rapid development by sending him there. The same holds true for mortal prospects. 

It’s long been my position that parks don’t stunt hitters.    The fact that their stats may not be as impressive in Norfolk doesn’t mean they’ll have trouble adjusting to the big leagues when they get there; if anything, it makes the transition easier IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m talking about what I’m realistically hoping for, not necessarily what I think their midrange expectation is.   I said before the year started that I thought Mancini would settle in as a .770-.780 OPS guy, and now his career slash line is .268/.319/.458, which is just about in line with what I expect.   Basically, he’s a RH Mitch Moreland, maybe a hair better.   But I’m hoping for a little more. 

I think it’s reasonable that Mancini is around .750 OPS. We just have to get him out of the OF. 

Right now we’re at the very beginnings of our rebuild. Anytime we see a player, in this case Stewart, that looks like that could put up even just a .700 OPS with average defense, it is a positive. We need cheap, controllable, contributors like that. Hopefully with Hays, Mountcastle, Diaz, being the high end bats. 

I think we could see a lineup next year where a lot of guys could be .700+ OPS guys. It’s a start

Mullins, Stewart, Villar, Mancini,Trumbo,Davis, Nunez, Beckham, Wynns/Sisco

Rickard, Wilkerson, Wynns/Sisco

It’s a start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Not that this means a lot but it just goes to show a couple cold months at Harbor Park doesn't have a lot of meaning either.

I don't get the whole "he didn't earn it" thing when it comes to September callups.

I do. Non-prospects and old  organizational players "deserve" the  call up. Yet they always go to the young guys who "have not paid their dues. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...