Jump to content

Things to try for the starting rotation


wildcard

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, atomic said:

How can you guarantee that?  You have no idea what he was doing.  We just know what he hasn't' been doing. 

We have a lot of circumstantial evidence and you can use common sense.  The guy came highly regarded from a franchise that tore it down to the studs, lost 100 games for a number of years, and rebuilt a Championship team.  He comes here and starts by tearing it down to the studs.  It's pretty straightforward to assume the next steps will be to collect pieces with long-term value and build up the development infrastructure.  Just like his experiences in Houston.  

You're the one going off on a wild excursion hypothesizing that instead of following an Astros-like plan instead he's been brought in to sabotage the franchise.  The Occam's Razor answer is they're emulating the Astros.  Your answer: it's a sinister plot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

We have a lot of circumstantial evidence and you can use common sense.  The guy came highly regarded from a franchise that tore it down to the studs, lost 100 games for a number of years, and rebuilt a Championship team.  He comes here and starts by tearing it down to the studs.  It's pretty straightforward to assume the next steps will be to collect pieces with long-term value and build up the development infrastructure.  Just like his experiences in Houston.  

You're the one going off on a wild excursion hypothesizing that instead of following an Astros-like plan instead he's been brought in to sabotage the franchise.  The Occam's Razor answer is they're emulating the Astros.  Your answer: it's a sinister plot.

No he didn't.

Davis, Trumbo, Cashner, Cobb, Givens all still here.

Did he trade any vets away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

We have a lot of circumstantial evidence and you can use common sense.  The guy came highly regarded from a franchise that tore it down to the studs, lost 100 games for a number of years, and rebuilt a Championship team.  He comes here and starts by tearing it down to the studs.  It's pretty straightforward to assume the next steps will be to collect pieces with long-term value and build up the development infrastructure.  Just like his experiences in Houston.  

You're the one going off on a wild excursion hypothesizing that instead of following an Astros-like plan instead he's been brought in to sabotage the franchise.  The Occam's Razor answer is they're emulating the Astros.  Your answer: it's a sinister plot.

Can't reason with him, El Drungo.  He's been told a bunch of times before, he's just not interested in learning or keeping an open mind.  

And that says a LOT coming from me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Yankees, Dodgers and Red Sox sign free agents or trade for players that flame out all the time. But like you said, they have a printing press that allows them to spend good money after bad. Plus they have a decent amount of home grown prospects that are contributors on the 25 man roster.

Orioles miss on Cobb and Davis, and it sets them back years. When the Red Sox can just go and find the next player.

The Sandoval contract would have been the 2nd-largest in Orioles history.  When the Sox got no production and cut bait on it that was about as siginificant to them as DFA'ing a $500k 5th outfielder is to the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No he didn't.

Davis, Trumbo, Cashner, Cobb, Givens all still here.

Did he trade any vets away?

Combined value of Davis, Trumbo, Cashner, Cobb, Givens... negative how many $million?  It would take some 27th-level GM wizardy to get more than a couple beer coasters for any of them but Givens.  All the guys with value were gone long before he became GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Combined value of Davis, Trumbo, Cashner, Cobb, Givens... negative how many $million?  It would take some 27th-level GM wizardy to get more than a couple beer coasters for any of them but Givens.  All the guys with value were gone long before he became GM.

I'm saying your terminology isn't accurate.  Dan tore the team down.  Elias hasn't traded or released anyone of note.  Elias could have theoretically cut Trumbo and Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

How can you guarantee that?  You have no idea what he was doing.  We just know what he hasn't' been doing. 

This is true. We can't guarantee anything. The Angelos brothers could absolutely be preparing this team for sale. Elias might be operating within confines unknown to us. It is possible. We cannot guarantee anything, even in the face of what has been said in many interviews since before Elias was hired until a couple of weeks ago with Tony. We won't know anything until it actually happens. 

However, what has been done so far is 100% consistent with what he's said and what happened in Houston. 

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No he didn't.

Davis, Trumbo, Cashner, Cobb, Givens all still here.

Did he trade any vets away?

It's May 22 of his first season here. You named 3 guys who are absolutely untradeable right now, a fourth who is just building value now and a fifth who's an ok reliever that we over rate here. 

But, like atomic says, we cannot guarantee Elias' intentions until we see him jettison the roster of the bad contracts and sign international players. Until then, and maybe even after, there's always the chance that the Angelos brothers are in strip it down to the studs to sell mode. We wouldn't even necessarily know until it's done. There's a chance for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Even if you want to count Mike Wright I don't think he qualifies as a "coming in" move.  I think those would have had to have been done before the season started.

I was being sarcastic. The veteran assets aren't really valuable unless you package them another prospect or international bonus pool allotments. And for contracts like Davis even that isn't enough to entice a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

This is true. We can't guarantee anything. The Angelos brothers could absolutely be preparing this team for sale. Elias might be operating within confines unknown to us. It is possible. We cannot guarantee anything, even in the face of what has been said in many interviews since before Elias was hired until a couple of weeks ago with Tony. We won't know anything until it actually happens. 

However, what has been done so far is 100% consistent with what he's said and what happened in Houston. 

It's May 22 of his first season here. You named 3 guys who are absolutely untradeable right now, a fourth who is just building value now and a fifth who's an ok reliever that we over rate here. 

But, like atomic says, we cannot guarantee Elias' intentions until we see him jettison the roster of the bad contracts and sign international players. Until then, and maybe even after, there's always the chance that the Angelos brothers are in strip it down to the studs to sell mode. We wouldn't even necessarily know until it's done. There's a chance for sure.

I'm not saying it would have been easy, heck I'm not saying it was possible.

What I am saying is that Drungo's statement isn't accurate.  Elias did not come in and tear the team down to the studs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm saying your terminology isn't accurate.  Dan tore the team down.  Elias hasn't traded or released anyone of note.  Elias could have theoretically cut Trumbo and Davis.

Torturing my metaphor a bit more, the veterans we still have around are like a herd of feral wildebeests wandering around your property.  A little annoying, but not really hurting anything if you let them stay while you're waiting for the contractor to come in and pour the new foundation.  They'll be gone long before the house is rebuilt and you move in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

What I am saying is that Drungo's statement isn't accurate.  Elias did not come in and tear the team down to the studs.

Apologies for my inaccurate statement.  He came into to a franchise with little left to tear down, but a long way to go to rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Torturing my metaphor a bit more, the veterans we still have around are like a herd of feral wildebeests wandering around your property.  A little annoying, but not really hurting anything if you let them stay while you're waiting for the contractor to come in and pour the new foundation.  They'll be gone long before the house is rebuilt and you move in.

I don't want a piece of this.  That's a 5/4 trampler that lets your opponent recast his Wall of Blossoms.

Stampeding%20Wildebeests.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • There is just no way Hyde is going to PH a lefty for a lefty when you have your #9 hitter RHB coming up. If Cedric sucks so bad that you PH another lefty then he really has no business being in the lineup at all. We may be approaching that point soon but we're not there yet.
    • I get where you are coming from but disagree.    You had 2 viable bench bats in Mountcastle and to a lesser extent Stowers. Mountcastle was there to hit if he could tie it.    You can’t compare Mateo and Mullins offensively the last couple of years. 
    • It’ll be curious to see what happens.  I see a guy that can’t throw strikes and when he does he gets hammered with meh stuff.  A 4.5 era 1.44 whip guy with significantly less Ks than IP is a dime a dozen in MLB.  
    • I get that and normally I'm in favor of playing the matchup game.   But Ced's terrible go of it lately negates that lefty .825 OPS against Munoz for me in that situation.  I'd have been alright with Mountcastle trying to catch a hold of one there instead...at least I think Mounty would have at a better chance to draw a walk and get on for Gunnar.  IMO, getting a runner on for Gunnar was the most important part of that inning, especially if you're going to prop up the .825 OPS Munoz has against lefties.  If getting a runner on was the most important thing, then I don't want the weakest hitter on the team up there no matter what side of the plate he's standing on, I want the guy who can likely give the best at bat.  For me, that was Mountcastle. Now I get the whole veteran thing, there was no way that Hyde was going to pinch hit for Mullins since he's been a valued member of the team.  But you could argue that Mateo has been a valued member of the team for the past couple years and that pinch hitting Stowers for him was a slap in the face to Mateo, especially when Mateo hasn't been the automatic out that Mullins has been lately.  
    • I’m the opposite. I think he gets claimed. Ton of bad teams would give him a look. 
    • I think we’ve all noticed that more calls have gone against the O’s than for them in the last few years.  It was only the Alomar part of your thesis that made me shake my head.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...