Jump to content

Yefry Ramirez Traded


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Philip said:

I did not know that, thank you for the clarification. I thought that when he was DFA-ed, He instantly went on waivers, which was a 10 day period during which he could be traded while going through the waiver process.

So you’re saying that when he’s designated there is a period of time only for trading or not trading, after which he goes to the waiver process?

That kind of begs the question of why didn’t we get more if they wanted him so bad? It also begs the question of why in God’s name did they want him so bad?

That is how I believe it works, yes.

Who said they wanted him "bad".   They wanted enough to give us a player to be named later or cash considerations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Ramirez did not go through waivers.  The O's traded him instead.   The Pirates wanted him so bad they out bid the other 29 teams to get him.

They wanted him so bad? It cost them....a ptbnl or cash.   Yep, 28 other teams said, "Too rich for my blood."
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

We don't know how much cash or what player to be named later.

All we know is the O's realized from the interest of other clubs after he was DFA'd that he would not make it through waivers.

Meh, no loss either way. Though what the Pirates saw I couldn’t say.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I saw Ramirez’s name on Norfolk’s stat sheet today and got curious how he was doing since we traded him.   5.54 ERA in 39 innings for the Pirates’ AAA affiliate, and one outing with the Pirates where he allowed 5 runs (3 earned) in 3.2 innings.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I saw Ramirez’s name on Norfolk’s stat sheet today and got curious how he was doing since we traded him.   5.54 ERA in 39 innings for the Pirates’ AAA affiliate, and one outing with the Pirates where he allowed 5 runs (3 earned) in 3.2 innings.    

Didn't think he was a big loss.  Glad I was correct.  Ain't that right, @wildcard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Too many eggs in one basket for me.  Usually you either go quantity or quality.  This feels like both quality and quantity.  You are trading away 3 possibly 4 guys that can go directly into their starting lineup.  You never see a 4 for 1 with that much major league ready guys.  It usually 1 or 2 major league guys then a few lottery tickets with some upside.   Cease got you one major league ready prospect, a 21 year old decent pitcher in AA, A young toolsy outfielder in A ball and a 29 year old relief pitcher in the majors.  
    • I'm going to disagree because I don't think hit for average is considered an "elite athlete" tool.  Elly De La Cruz is an elite athlete, so was Bubba Starling.  Mateo is an Elite athlete. You can be an elite athlete and still not be a good ML player.  
    • I think when people say "elite athlete" about a baseball player, they mean that someone has the proverbial five tools--hit for average, hit for power, run, throw, field.   Someone like (say) Ronald Acuna Jr. or Gunnar Henderson.    Obviously there are great baseball players who never had all five tools (Frank Thomas) and players who were elite athletes who could have been better had they mastered other skills such as plate discipline (Adam Jones).   The "five tools" framework means that most catching prospects, including Basallo, will never be considered to be elite athletes, because they lack top-grade speed.   And it's rare that you would hear a pitcher described as an "elite athlete".  
    • They are not going to trade Holliday for one starter.  They need a couple of bullpen arms before a starter.
    • It's closer than the vote totals seem to indicate IMO.  I honestly wouldn't be against it because I do think Crochet is top shelf talent.  And it does cash out some strong/buried assets too. I landed on appreciating what Cowser adds all around vs. questioning the bump he'd provide for 2024.  
    • If Skubal is truly on the table, I’m definitely of the mindset to give up one of the big three as a trade centerpiece. For me, that’s Holliday given the potential of Mayo slotting at 3B and Westy moving back to 2B. Skubal is exactly what we need to go win a WS this year. 
    • Where's @DirtyBird to downvote everyone that's saying 2/3 is fine? I hate Oakland.  Hate, hate, hate Oakland.  Every year it seems that they give us fits for no good reason, especially in their place.  And @Frobbythat's not an invite for you to go do research and be like "well, actually" if I'm wrong.   I can't name 5 players on their team and I'm sure they'll give us fits this weekend.  But I see Brent Rooker is still on the team.  If he doesn't have 5 homers and 20 RBI against us this weekend, I'll be surprised.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...