Jump to content

Adam Stauffer


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

We've gone THREE (!!) Stauffer appearances without an update. 

On Aug 13, he gave up his only two earned runs since moving to Delmarva in a 2 inning stint. Since then, he's had a pair of 2-inning outtings, striking out 9, allowing 2 hits and walking 2. 

So far on the season, 41 IP, 57 K, 17 BB, only 20 hits and 1 HR allowed. 1.10 ERA,  0.90 WHIP. 

He's 20 years old. Would like to see him get stretched out next season in Delmarva.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WalkWithElias said:

We've gone THREE (!!) Stauffer appearances without an update. 

On Aug 13, he gave up his only two earned runs since moving to Delmarva in a 2 inning stint. Since then, he's had a pair of 2-inning outtings, striking out 9, allowing 2 hits and walking 2. 

So far on the season, 41 IP, 57 K, 17 BB, only 20 hits and 1 HR allowed. 1.10 ERA,  0.90 WHIP. 

He's 20 years old. Would like to see him get stretched out next season in Delmarva.

Is that good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Outstanding interview, Chuck.   Stauffer kind of came out of nowhere last year.   I remember doing a thread guessing the Aberdeen rotation; I named ten candidates and Stauffer wasn’t one of them.    Then he was so dominant for Aberdeen that he got promoted to Delmarva pretty quickly.   He did well there, too.    I’ll be interested to see where he begins 2020 and in what role.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JMU_Birdfan said:

Great interview! Another year like last year and Stauffer should be mentioned in the same group of names as D.L. Hall and GrayRod. 

Wow, that’s quite a statement.   He did make no. 22 on the OH list, 11th among the pitchers.    But there are some pretty good pitchers ahead of him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Wow, that’s quite a statement.   He did make no. 22 on the OH list, 11th among the pitchers.    But there are some pretty good pitchers ahead of him.  

Stauffer and Rodgriguez put up similar numbers (besides the fact that GrayRod pitched more than twice as many innings) last year. K/9, Whip, BB/9,  Stauffer actually had a better ERA.

Not saying they're equal as prospects now, but sticking to my original comment. If Stauffer and continue to post similar numbers to GrayRod then he should be considered a top of the organization pitching prospect in the same conversation as D.L. and Gray Rod. 

Stauffer is younger than D.L. and was born the same year as GrayRod. Stauffer is actually bigger than both of them, suggesting that he could continue to add muscle and develop into a legit man on the mound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JMU_Birdfan said:

Stauffer and Rodgriguez put up similar numbers (besides the fact that GrayRod pitched more than twice as many innings) last year. K/9, Whip, BB/9,  Stauffer actually had a better ERA.

Not saying they're equal as prospects now, but sticking to my original comment. If Stauffer and continue to post similar numbers to GrayRod then he should be considered a top of the organization pitching prospect in the same conversation as D.L. and Gray Rod. 

Stauffer is younger than D.L. and was born the same year as GrayRod. Stauffer is actually bigger than both of them, suggesting that he could continue to add muscle and develop into a legit man on the mound. 

From your keyboard to God’s ears. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JMU_Birdfan said:

Stauffer and Rodgriguez put up similar numbers (besides the fact that GrayRod pitched more than twice as many innings) last year. K/9, Whip, BB/9,  Stauffer actually had a better ERA.

Not saying they're equal as prospects now, but sticking to my original comment. If Stauffer and continue to post similar numbers to GrayRod then he should be considered a top of the organization pitching prospect in the same conversation as D.L. and Gray Rod. 

Stauffer is younger than D.L. and was born the same year as GrayRod. Stauffer is actually bigger than both of them, suggesting that he could continue to add muscle and develop into a legit man on the mound. 

Let’s see how they use him.    Putting up numbers as a reliever is different from putting them up as a starter.    What I’d like is for him to start the year in the Delmarva rotation and then get promoted to Frederick after a few months if he’s able to dominate as a starter in the Sally League.   It’s going to be a real challenge to slot all these pitchers because we had a ton of successes at Delmarva, Aberdeen and the GCL last year, and a lot of them were recent college draftees who will be 22-23 this year so you want to move them along.   The competition should be pretty fierce.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Frobby said:

Outstanding interview, Chuck.   Stauffer kind of came out of nowhere last year.   I remember doing a thread guessing the Aberdeen rotation; I named ten candidates and Stauffer wasn’t one of them.    Then he was so dominant for Aberdeen that he got promoted to Delmarva pretty quickly.   He did well there, too.    It’ll be interested to see where he begins 2020 and in what role.   

Thanks @Frobby  He is one I'll have my eyes on as the season progresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...