Jump to content

2019 Trade Deadline


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 907
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So we're really just talking about O'Day's salary since Gausman would have been traded either way. And you think the team is so strapped financially that they needed O'Day's $9M to cover everything you mentioned? The Orioles aren't a small market team, they're a mid-market team. They should have had the dollars to invest in everything you mentioned even with O'Day on the payroll. And a $100M payroll isn't what it used to be. It basically puts you in the bottom third in terms of payroll in this era.  

So, wildbill, you have now downgraded or abandoned the "zero indication the $ has been reinvested into the team" to "they should have had the $ to invest in everything you mentioned even with O'Day on payroll".  You should have just posted this initially and I would have understood you are talking in poorly conceived generalities that can't be confirmed or refuted on an internet message board.  But, I do have an extensive accounting and finance background, I have worked on proposals worth over $1B and worked the full budget of a $300+M company and would appreciate it if you humor me with what I would have done if I were the Angelos brothers.  

Upon seeing the $140M 2018 payroll fail and realizing a full re-build was in order, I would have gone about putting together a 2019 preliminary budget.  There would be inputs on the revenue side - MASN $, MLB $, advertising $ and attendance.  Now, some of the items above could probably be budgeted pretty well, but a decline in attendance/season ticket sales would have been an estimate.  On the cost side, with a focus on putting $ into the rebuild, you budgeted for a GM, a front office, a coach, the draft, and much more; and you put together a list of initiatives (international scouting director, actual international spend, a real analytics group, etc).  And you set a target profit (or loss).  Perhaps on the cost side you put in a contingency in case attendance is weaker than estimated or you lose an arbitration case.  You know what the biggest variable to tweak is on the cost side - it's player payroll.  And you know what you need in order to commit to funding those initiatives - cost certainty - particularly on the biggest cost - player salaries.   

You can't hire a new GM and show him the budget and say, we can afford to invest internationally as long as season ticket sales don't fall below a certain number.  Or as long as we don't lose in arbitration on Villar.  Or tell the new GM - no, we don't have $5M in case a great reliever falls to us on the free agent market or to take gambles on DFA guys.  That new GM wants your commitment on all those initiatives that improve the rebuild path.  That new GM wants to build a shiny, state of the art analytics group.  He wants to hire a scouting director and invest internationally.  And all the while the league/commissioner's office is making inquiries into who is running the team and viewing decisions involving the long term competitiveness of the franchise through a critical lens.

And so, when you are one of the Angelos brothers and you sit there in June/July 2018 and you look at the projected 2019 Plan from revenues to costs to the new initiatives and the roster and the various assumptions and contingencies, the most obvious way forward in reducing player salaries and achieving a reduced and appropriate cost certainly is to look at the injured and costly Darren O'Day (your most unproductive player asset - at least Davis takes the field), and you tell your GM to make it a priority to move O'Day in the deadline deals.  It is a logical and simple solution and more valuable to securing lower player costs for the 2019 Plan than maximizing the prospect haul from a Gausman trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

That's the Braves #1 pick from 2015 and #10 prospect. Not setting the world on fire but a  nice return for a 31 year old pending free agent.

 

 

Agreed.  Makes you wonder what the Braves would've given for Givens, who has of course struggled but has a good K rate and is controllable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Dodgers writer is smoking the crack pipe! 

 

He says Givens would be a buy low and sort of a reclamation project ....LOL

 

So paying less than he's worth lass than 2 months of journeyman Chris Martin.

 

http://dodgersdigest.com/2019/07/30/2019-trade-deadline-targets-rhp-mychal-givens-orioles/

Quote

Cost

Givens, at this stage, would be a buy-low candidate. He’s under team control through the 2021 season and is due the remainder of his $2.15 million salary for this season. His past performance shows there’s some untapped talent in his right arm, and if the Dodgers could get him for cheap, they could be getting an effective middle reliever.

Package 1

To BAL: John RooneyEdwin Rios
To LA: Givens

Rooney would give the O’s a nice left-handed starter to develop. Rios could come up right away and take some playing time at first base, third base, left field or designated hitter. And with Trey Mancini on the trade block, there could be a vacancy for an MLB-ready bat.

Package 2

To BAL: Gerardo CarrilloCody Thomas
To LA: Givens

Carrillo’s scouting reports are better than his results thus far, but the 20-year-old has a live arm and could be developed into a mid-rotation starter. Thomas is still a bit raw, but he’s an athletic outfielder with big-time power.

——

If the returns for Givens seem a bit light, it’s because he’d be more of reclamation project kind of acquisition — one more for the next couple season rather than this season. If there’s any organization out there that can not only get him back to his previous level of production, but get him to that next level, it’s the Dodgers. And if they can get him for a decent enough price, they could reap the benefits.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, interloper said:

I would love to see Elias be involved in a 3 team deal if only because the Orioles have never been creative in trades and I haven't seen a multi team Orioles trade ever that I can recall.

Sports Guy had probably 50 of them teed up for the O’s that never came to fruition.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...