Jump to content

ROY- Means or Alvarez?


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

Alverez has come on blazing. He’s been a great part of a great team and he’s done great things in a partial season. He is also a position player which means he plays basically every day

BUT

Means has been a great player on a horrible team, not just our best pitcher this year, but better than anybody we had last year too. Almost every team in MLB would be thrilled to have him. With even reasonable defense and/or relievers behind him, he might have 5 additional wins, and a much lower ERA.

What says the crowd?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Initially I thought this was a no-brainer for Alvarez. His OPS of over 1.100 is better than Mike Trout's, and Trout is having one of the best offensive seasons of his career. If he had enough at bats, Alvarez would be leading the AL in OPS as a rookie.  Almost unheard of.

On the other hand, Alvarez doesn't play defense, and his offense has been worth 3.9 WAR.  John Means has been (far and away) the O's best starter as a rookie, and has earned a higher WAR (4.6, 9th in the AL for pitchers).

On the other hand, Alvarez can contribute almost every day, Means only every 5th day.

It's closer than I thought.  I can see a case for either of them. But I think it goes to Alvarez based on the fact that Houston is a much better team with much better exposure.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Slappy said:

Initially I thought this was a no-brainer for Alvarez. His OPS of over 1.100 is better than Mike Trout's, and Trout is having one of the best offensive seasons of his career. If he had enough at bats, Alvarez would be leading the AL in OPS as a rookie.  Almost unheard of.

On the other hand, Alvarez doesn't play defense, and his offense has been worth 3.9 WAR.  John Means has been (far and away) the O's best starter as a rookie, and has earned a higher WAR (4.6, 9th in the AL for pitchers).

On the other hand, Alvarez can contribute almost every day, Means only every 5th day.

It's closer than I thought.  I can see a case for either of them. But I think it goes to Alvarez based on the fact that Houston is a much better team with much better exposure.

That’s exactly my conclusion as well, but I would really like someone to make a solid argument otherwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alvarez has been consistently productive for a good team. If he wasn’t they’d likely have other options. 

Means had a stretch of forgettable games after the break and the defense or the bullpen had little to do with it. 

But, I’m I believer in WAR. Oh, btw Fangraphs has it 4 to 3.1 for Alvarez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Slappy said:

Initially I thought this was a no-brainer for Alvarez. His OPS of over 1.100 is better than Mike Trout's, and Trout is having one of the best offensive seasons of his career. If he had enough at bats, Alvarez would be leading the AL in OPS as a rookie.  Almost unheard of.

On the other hand, Alvarez doesn't play defense, and his offense has been worth 3.9 WAR.  John Means has been (far and away) the O's best starter as a rookie, and has earned a higher WAR (4.6, 9th in the AL for pitchers).

On the other hand, Alvarez can contribute almost every day, Means only every 5th day.

It's closer than I thought.  I can see a case for either of them. But I think it goes to Alvarez based on the fact that Houston is a much better team with much better exposure.

Alvarez only has 351 at bats.  I think Alvarez wins going away. It is just like on here.  Almost Everythong threw out defense and put down Mancini as the most valuable Oriole.   And he is only 4th on the team in WAR.  People talk analytics a lot but at the end of the day they don't use it for things like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Alvarez has been consistently productive for a good team. If he wasn’t they’d likely have other options. 

Means had a stretch of forgettable games after the break and the defense or the bullpen had little to do with it. 

But, I’m I believer in WAR. Oh, btw Fangraphs has it 4 to 3.1 for Alvarez.

That is because Fangraphs uses bogus WAR to rate pitchers.  Since he only strikes out 7 batters per 9 innings Means loses WAR from fanagraphs.  As WAR is supposed to be used to tell how well you did and  isn't a predictive tool for future seasons it is a really awful way to judge Wins Above Replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, atomic said:

That is because Fangraphs uses bogus WAR to rate pitchers.  Since he only strikes out 7 batters per 9 innings Means loses WAR from fanagraphs.  As WAR is supposed to be used to tell how well you did and  isn't a predictive tool for future seasons it is a really awful way to judge Wins Above Replacement. 

Lol, ok. Well, I’m so relieved I have your expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, atomic said:

Alvarez only has 351 at bats.  I think Alvarez wins going away. It is just like on here.  Almost Everythong threw out defense and put down Mancini as the most valuable Oriole.   And he is only 4th on the team in WAR.  People talk analytics a lot but at the end of the day they don't use it for things like this. 

Analytics tells you that per team game or per plate appearance Alvarez is almost twice as valuable as John Means.  Alvarez has been arguably the best player in the AL since he was called up.  Means is a pretty good pitcher.  The only way Means wins is if you put 100% weight on counting stats and almost nothing on peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Kopech is interesting. As for Fedde? The days of 4.50 ERA and up should be over for the O's. Being this is out of the norm, and not the AL East.. Fedde is not worth it to me. I'd rather bring up a young guy and work with him than wait for the sky to fall. Maybe Dan D can find a spot for him somewhere.
    • Why not? Not like it’s a day after a night game and they are off tomorrow. Exactly what it should be.
    • Never asked for everyday..but real opportunity should be there and hiding behind some stupid archaic rule when the info you actually have suggests otherwise is dumb.  
    • Fedde is a hard guy to peg.    Kudos to him for making what looks like a great choice for his Age 30 year. It feels a little dicey to me if the first half success (never mind Year 2) can stick as the league digests the changes in his game. Elias will get to see a couple more starts of his back rotation guys figuring how the Floor v. Upside balance he buys. I think of Chris Flexen some when I think of him as an Asia guy who had time constrained success coming back to the USA with a new set of skills.
    • 1: Jones only had some in-season swings that made us think but his o-swing rate was quite a bit worse.  Mountcastle's chase rate is the lowest of his career this season. 2: I think we were more willing to forgive Jones for swinging at low/away sliders because he played a premium defensive position.
    • I think you have the BABIP point backwards.  League average BABIP is .288, so Fedde’s .269 suggests he’s had some combination of good defense or good luck.  Also, per Statcast his 3.13 ERA is better than his xERA of 3.57.   
    • The fit here seems almost too obvious. Veteran rentals where we’ll only have to take on a relatively small amount of money and probably won’t cost us anything particularly high-end.  Given my choice, I’d probably lean toward Heaney and Robertson. I like the idea of adding a lefty to what it appears at the moment will be a pretty righty heavy SP group, and Heaney is in great form at the moment. And I think Robertson’s performance seems a little more sustainable than Yates’s, given their more recent track records. He’s also got a ton of playoff pitching history, so I’d have a little more trust in his ability to manage the moment. I think the biggest mystery for me is what would Texas be seeking. The ML lineup seems pretty set, so it’s hard to envision a Norby or Stowers having value there. Maybe a “now” pitcher like Povich/McDermott plus a couple lower level/higher ceiling guys?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...