Jump to content

Oscar Colás - Time to Spend Some of That Int'l Money?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Probably more than any other team. As usual. 

A real statement would be to spend over the allotment and just pay the penalty of sitting out a year, plus the dollar for dollar penalty.  

The real question is, if this dude were in the draft, where would he get drafted?  It could be like adding a top 5-10 pick.  Our franchise desperately needs talent.  

It is a hard cap now. There is not going over and paying a penalty.

The Orioles will not be among the teams with the highest allotment next year. The teams with the highest allotment will be the teams that have competitive balance picks in Round B of the 2020 MLB Draft, namely the Marlins, Tigers, Rays, Brewers Reds and Twins.

The Orioles will be among the teams with the next highest allotment, those with competitive balance picks in Round A of the 2020 MLB draft which includes the Orioles, Pirates, Royals, D'Backs, Padres, Rockies, Indians and Cardinals.

The difference between the first and second group last year was about $550K. 

For the 2019-20 period, those two groups were swapped.

The remainder of the teams all have the same allotment (approximately $550K less than the second group), except the Braves who will have half as much due to their tomfoolery in the International market.

Teams also forfeit part of their allotment if they sign a QO declining free-agent, and slots can also be traded.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

It is a hard cap now. There is not going over and paying a penalty.

The Orioles will not be among the teams with the highest allotment next year. The teams with the highest allotment will be the teams that have competitive balance picks in Round B of the 2020 MLB Draft, namely the Marlins, Tigers, Rays, Brewers Reds and Twins.

The Orioles will be among the teams with the next highest allotment, those with competitive balance picks in Round A of the 2020 MLB draft which includes the Orioles, Pirates, Royals, D'Backs, Padres, Rockies, Indians and Cardinals.

The difference between the first and second group last year was about $550K

The remainder of the teams all have the same allotment (approximately $550K less than the second group), except the Braves who will have half as much due to their tomfoolery in the International market. Teams also forfeit part of their allotment if they sign a QO declining free-agent.

...but they can trade for international money right? Maybe we can actually follow through with the plan that Duquette and Brady botched in 201.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Probably more than any other team. As usual. 

A real statement would be to spend over the allotment and just pay the penalty of sitting out a year, plus the dollar for dollar penalty.  

The real question is, if this dude were in the draft, where would he get drafted?  It could be like adding a top 5-10 pick.  Our franchise desperately needs talent.  

...and more specifically "pitching" talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Colas will tell us a lot about the Orioles plan and Elias' ability to spend money.  He seems to be an absolute no brainer in terms of talent acquisition.

I like how this guy we learned about today is "an absolute no brainer in terms of talent acquisition," just like VV Mesa was right? 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Spl51 said:

I like how this guy we learned about today is "an absolute no brainer in terms of talent acquisition," just like VV Mesa was right? 

My thoughts exactly. Let's hurry up and sign this guy before MLB executives read this post and learn how good he is. 

Edited by Darkhawk
Typo
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Spl51 said:

I like how this guy we learned about today is "an absolute no brainer in terms of talent acquisition," just like VV Mesa was right? 

To be fair all you have to do is read the scouting reports and look at the statistics.  Your characterization that it is impossible to make an informed judgment after doing even a modicum of research is baffling to me.   

Here, I will make it easy for you: 

Colas Statistics

Article 1

Highlight

Article 2 (with scouting takes)

Yes.  This is a no brainer.  The Orioles need talent, and they need to be willing to spend money to get it, evening some of it is a miss.

And adding a hindsight anecdotal observation of a cherry picked other player who almost everyone agreed at the time was a no brainer doesnt really carry much weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

Maybe they could trade the slots to another team that wants to sign  Colas.

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...but they can trade for international money right? Maybe we can actually follow through with the plan that Duquette and Brady botched in 201.

We could likely get this guy if we really want him and he's willing to post this year. If next year, all bets are off.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...