Jump to content

Per Capita Team Attendance


AZRon

Recommended Posts

The number of posts relating to MLB team attendance on my ODP Payroll post See opening ODP post caused me to cogitate on perspectives as to relative and relevant attendance numbers. So, I assembled this chart:

Team Metropolitan Area 2018 Estimated Population1 2019 Attendance2 Attendance Per Capita % of Capacity Mileage to Nearest Different MLB Stadium3
New York (NYY) 19.98 M 3.30 M 0.17 75.2% 9
New York (NYM) 19.98 M 2.44 M 0.12 71.9% 9
Los Angeles (LAA) 13.29 M 3.02 M 0.23 82.7% 31
Los Angeles (LAD) 13.29 M 3.97 M 0.30 87.6% 31
Chicago (CWS) 9.50 M 1.65 M 0.17 50.1% 10
Chicago (CHC) 9.50 M 3.09 M 0.33 91.7% 10
Texas (TEX) 7.54 M 2.13 M 0.28 54.7% 257
Houston (HOU) 7.00 M 2.86 M 0.41 86.0% 257
Washington (WSH) 6.25 M 2.26 M 0.36 67.4% 38
Miami (MIA) 6.20 M .81 M 0.13 27.3% 266
Philadelphia (PHI) 6.10 M 2.73 M 0.45 77.1% 100
Toronto (TOR) 6.08 M 1.75 M 0.29 43.8% 230
Atlanta (ATL) 5.95 M 2.66 M 0.45 79.7% 449
Boston (BOS) 4.88 M 2.92 M 0.60 95.1% 204
Arizona (ARI) 4.86 M 2.14 M 0.44 54.2% 356
San Francisco (SF) 4.73 M 2.71 M 0.57 79.8% 17
Oakland (OAK) 4.73 M 1.66 M 0.35 43.5% 17
Detroit (DET) 4.33 M 1.50 M 0.35 44.5% 168
Seattle (SEA) 3.94 M 1.79 M 0.45 46.6% 807
Minnesota (MIN) 3.63 M 2.29 M 0.63 73.3% 334
San Diego (SD) 3.34 M 2.40 M 0.72 69.6% 95
Tampa Bay (TB) 3.14 M 1.18 M 0.38 58.2% 266
Colorado (COL) 2.93 M 2.99 M 1.02 74.7% 609
St. Louis (STL) 2.81 M 3.48 M 1.24 91.7% 242
Baltimore (BAL) 2.80 M 1.31 M 0.47 35.1% 38
Pittsburgh (PIT) 2.32 M 1.49 M 0.64 48.0% 134
Cincinnati (CIN) 2.19 M 1.81 M 0.83 52.8% 250
Kansas City (KC) 2.14 M 1.48 M 0.69 48.2% 242
Cleveland (CLE) 2.06 M 1.74 M 0.85 61.3% 134
Milwaukee (MIL) 1.58 M 2.92 M 1.85 86.1% 91

1 https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2019/metro-county-pop-estimates.html
https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/20402/toronto/population

2 https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2019-misc.shtml

3 https://bitbucket.org/trhdata/mlb-stadiums/downloads/

Here are some of my takeaways as to the O's attendance in 2019:

Baltimore's Metropolitan area size ranked 25th, just a hair behind St. Louis. The 10 lowest-revenue clubs and the clubs from the 10 smallest markets are eligible to receive a Competitive Balance pick (fewer than 20 clubs are in the mix each year, as some clubs qualify under both criteria).

O's ranked 28th in total attendance, ahead of Tampa Bay and Miami.

O's ranked 12th in per capita attendance, a bit ahead of the Mariners, the Phillies and the Braves.

P.S.
3 teams' season attendance exceeded their metropolitan area population - Brewers, Cardinals, and Rockies.

In per capita attendance, Yankees ranked 28th and Mets ranked last.

Edited by AZRon
Added a column displaying season's attendance as a % of stadium capacity for the 2019 season
  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

When you are talking about metropolitan areas with two teams might it not be fair to account for the presence of another team?....

Why not?  MLB uses the size of metropolitan area (regardless of the number of teams in that area) as one of the criteria for eligibility for a competitive balance draft pick.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AZRon said:

Why not?  MLB uses the size of metropolitan area (regardless of the number of teams in that area) as one of the criteria for eligibility for a competitive balance draft pick.

I think it would be interesting to add a column showing the distance to the closest other team.     Even that wouldn’t really capture the geographic effect though.   Baltimore is really hemmed in between DC and Philly.    St. Louis is at least 300 miles from any other team in all directions.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think it would be interesting to add a column showing the distance to the closest other team.     Even that wouldn’t really capture the geographic effect though.   Baltimore is really hemmed in between DC and Philly.    St. Louis is at least 300 miles from any other team in all directions.   

I thought about that (but the compensation for my efforts is so "spare"?).

OK -- I'll do it later.

Later has arrived -- See opening post

Edited by AZRon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, AZRon said:

I thought about that (but the compensation for my efforts is so "spare"?).

OK -- I'll do it later

By the way, this map from Seat Geek is interesting.    It breaks the US into counties and then shows which team “owns” the majority of online ticket sales in that county.    https://www.google.com/amp/s/seatgeek.com/tba/articles/where-do-mlb-fans-live-mapping-baseball-fandom-across-the-u-s/amp/

I think Milwaukee’s per capita performance is really impressive when you consider this map.   Basically, only people from Wisconsin go to Brewers games, and the fans in the northwest part of the state are more likely to go to a Twins game.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a large city the attendance per capita data has a low limit...If the Yankees sold out every game, their attendance would max out at 4.3 million and their max attendance per capita would be a little over .2. So, does that say NY is a bad baseball city? Likewise, a small metro area with just "average" MLB attendance can result In an inflated numbers.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think it would be interesting to add a column showing the distance to the closest other team.     Even that wouldn’t really capture the geographic effect though.   Baltimore is really hemmed in between DC and Philly.    St. Louis is at least 300 miles from any other team in all directions.   

About 250 miles to Kansas City and 300 to Chicago.

 

BIeKWPbMg-TRMzsewXB3zcqlTD57FNBLThTmjgWR

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UpstateNYfan said:

For a large city the attendance per capita data has a low limit...If the Yankees sold out every game, their attendance would max out at 4.3 million and their max attendance per capita would be a little over .2. So, does that say NY is a bad baseball city? Likewise, a small metro area with just "average" MLB attendance can result In an inflated numbers.

Well, that's true, I'll add a column for % of capacity later.

Maybe, that will further enlighten us as to a team's relative:
fervency of fandom
marketing effectiveness
availability of alternative entertainment venues
competitiveness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 
    • I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats.  In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 
    • I don’t think it will meaningfully affect who they are looking to deal at the trade deadline. The Orioles will be more inclined to include guys who they aren’t planning to add to the 40 as the last pieces in a deal, but there isn’t a huge crunch that means they NEED to clear 40 man roster space. Of all the guys after Hays on that list, I think Strowd and Young are the only ones who are high probability of being added right now. None of the other borderline guys have much trade value at all. Note Baker is out of options next year, he’s going to have to pitch well the rest of the year to warrant his spot.  I also think Luis González is going to get a look at some point and will ultimately become the new Vespi for 2025, optionable lefty riding the Norfolk shuttle. 
    • Yea, for this season. As I said, any of those guys are capable for a season or 2 but the odds are that they won’t live up to larger contracts and that you don’t want to get into expensive deals with guys like that.
    • Good question. I have been so focused on this season I have given zero thought to the 40 Man and Rule 5. I think Santander gets QO and O'Hearn goes FA. We could lose both. I don't really see any young guys that "must" be protected other than Mayo, McDermott, and S. Johnson. D. Johnson is having a nice season as CF is a need but not sure he belongs on the 40 man. Davidson is having a nice season. I could see him taking a deep depth spot to replace Zimmermann.     
    • I wonder if he could comp with the glove to a guy like Alec Bohm? Big dude, not a great defender, but doesn't kill his team and makes some great plays along the way with the glove while mashing with the bat.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...