Jump to content

Roster move: Akin optioned


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Yeah, I don't think you understand the meaning of organizational filler.  Organization fillers are guys who are used to fill out minor league rosters and will be lucky to get a cup of coffee in the majors. 

Akin is a real prospect.  Not one of our better ones, but has a solid shot at being some type of contributor.  Whether that is as a starter or multi-inning reliever out of the pen remains to be seen. 

We'll see how he ends up.  I'm betting on slightly better than filler.  You?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I believe you're partially correct. 

The thing is, I'm not sure what separates Akin from being a AAAA type.  I'm too lazy to look up his stats and peripherals, but from what I've seen and the scouting reports I've read, he doesn't seem to be too far removed from that profile.  If someone can explain to me what significantly separates Akin from an Eshelman/Wojo type, I'd love to hear it.

An above average fastball from the left side and two solid average secondary pitches.  He led the international league in strike outs last year as a 24 year old.  That's not nothing. 

Maybe if you are too lazy to look up stats and scouting reports on minor league players you shouldn't provide such definitive commentary on them.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

We'll see how he ends up.  I'm betting on slightly better than filler.  You?

Not an organizational filler.  He's always had trouble going deep into games.  It's unlikely he can put it together as  a starter.  But I think he's got a good chance to be a 2-3 inning bullpen guy throwing 95 from the left side (rare) and can get both lefties and righties out.  Those guys are valuable in today's game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChuckS said:

An above average fastball from the left side and two solid average secondary pitches.  He led the international league in strike outs last year as a 24 year old.  That's not nothing. 

Maybe if you are too lazy to look up stats and scouting reports on minor league players you shouldn't provide such definitive commentary on them.  

Ooooookay.  Well, before going to bed,  I just looked up his scouting report on 2080baseball.com and saw that his future offerings profile to a 50 on the 20 to 80 scale.  So, average.  The fastball that you claim to be average sits at 91-92, can hit 94.  So, average.  

Everything else, delivery, athleticism, pitchability is average to below average.  Mound presence is a plus, that's great.

OH's own @Luke-OH back in November was slightly more generous and his fastball/change 55s.  With the ceiling as a #4 starter.

That's his CEILING.  That's if everything goes RIGHT for him.  It's rare that everything goes right for a player.  The baseball landscape is littered with many players that things did not go right for.  

I wouldn't bet that everything goes right for someone with average stuff.  But if you're excited about average pitchers, I don't know what to tell you.  

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ooooookay.  Well, before going to bed,  I just looked up his scouting report on 2080baseball.com and saw that his future offerings profile to a 50 on the 20 to 80 scale.  So, average.  The fastball that you claim to be average sits at 91-92, can hit 94.  So, average.  

Everything else, delivery, athleticism, pitchability is average to below average.  Mound presence is a plus, that's great.

OH's own @Luke-OH back in November was slightly more generous and his fastball/change 55s.  With the ceiling as a #4 starter.

That's his CEILING.  That's if everything goes RIGHT for him.  It's rare that everything goes right for a player.  The baseball landscape is littered with many players that things did not go right for.  

I wouldn't bet that everything goes right for someone with average stuff.  But if you're excited about average pitchers, I don't know what to tell you.  

 

 

There is more to having a good fastball than velocity, his of which is above average for a lefty.  Generates a lot of swings and misses up in the zone.  Has already shown to play up (95-96) in shorter outings in the Arizona Fall League.  So it's above average by most accounts.  

I never claimed he would reach his ceiling or that everything would go right for him.  In fact, I said I expected him to end up in the pen.  So I'm not sure where you are going. 

Also, if you haven't been paying attention we could use some pitchers with average big league stuff. Am I excited about him?  Not really.  I was just trying to point out the absurdity of you calling him organizational filler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

There is more to having a good fastball than velocity, his of which is above average for a lefty.  Generates a lot of swings and misses up in the zone.  Has already shown to play up (95-96) in shorter outings in the Arizona Fall League.  So it's above average by most accounts.  

I never claimed he would reach his ceiling or that everything would go right for him.  In fact, I said I expected him to end up in the pen.  So I'm not sure where you are going. 

Also, if you haven't been paying attention we could use some pitchers with average big league stuff. Am I excited about him?  Not really.  I was just trying to point out the absurdity of you calling him organizational filler. 

Semantics.  IMO, filler is a quad A guy that gets shuttled back and forth.  And when you have a team as crappy as ours, they might stick around for a season or two in the bigs for lack of a better option.

Glad you're not really excited about Akin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Semantics.  IMO, filler is a quad A guy that gets shuttled back and forth.  And when you have a team as crappy as ours, they might stick around for a season or two in the bigs for lack of a better option.

Glad you're not really excited about Akin.

I think it’s best to adopt an approach of humility when assessing how a prospect might fare in the long run.    We’ve seen highly touted guys fail miserably and unheralded guys carve out good careers at times.    We have a lot of decent pitching prospects at the upper levels of the minors right now and it’s anybody’s guess which ones will become decent or better major league pitchers.   But I do have hopes that the group of Akin, Zimmermann, Kremer, Lowther, Wells and Baumann will yield some successful pitchers.    It’s the best group we’ve had in a decade or so even if no one guy stands out.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s best to adopt an approach of humility when assessing how a prospect might fare in the long run.    We’ve seen highly touted guys fail miserably and unheralded guys carve out good careers at times.    We have a lot of decent pitching prospects at the upper levels of the minors right now and it’s anybody’s guess which ones will become decent or better major league pitchers.   But I do have hopes that the group of Akin, Zimmermann, Kremer, Lowther, Wells and Baumann will yield some successful pitchers.    It’s the best group we’ve had in a decade or so even if no one guy stands out.    

Frobby, my approach of assessing prospects, especially Orioles prospects, is that they're all going to fail, and fail miserably. 

Until they don't. 

That's not humility, that's treating everyone equally.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Frobby, my approach of assessing prospects, especially Orioles prospects, is that they're all going to fail, and fail miserably. 

Until they don't. 

That's not humility, that's treating everyone equally.

I can’t blame you for taking that approach. Back in the day, one of my nicknames for Nick Markakis was The Boy Who Lived, because he was the one success in a sea of developmental failures in his era.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I can’t blame you for taking that approach. Back in the day, one of my nicknames for Nick Markakis was The Boy Who Lived, because he was the one success in a sea of developmental failures in his era.   

With exceedingly low expectations, any measure of success is a pleasant surprise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s best to adopt an approach of humility when assessing how a prospect might fare in the long run.    We’ve seen highly touted guys fail miserably and unheralded guys carve out good careers at times.    We have a lot of decent pitching prospects at the upper levels of the minors right now and it’s anybody’s guess which ones will become decent or better major league pitchers.   But I do have hopes that the group of Akin, Zimmermann, Kremer, Lowther, Wells and Baumann will yield some successful pitchers.    It’s the best group we’ve had in a decade or so even if no one guy stands out.    

This is where I stand.  Akin has a chance to be as high as a #4 starter which is nothing to sneeze at.  The O's have been a team of #5's for too long.  So yeah I am mostly an optimist.  If this was the DD era (which I know Akin came from), he would've been rushed to the big leagues last year to fail.  Spring brings hope eternal.  Robert Frost type crap.  I subscribe to this.  Akin has decent stuff he just needs to find some consistency and probably confidence in his off speed pitches.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view of Akin has actually improved somewhat during this ST. I know he didn't pitch well, but he appeared to carry better stuff than I realized. I love that he was throwing 95, and he did get a bunch of Ks. He just needs to locate better. 

A #4 is probably right, but I'm not sure why he couldn't do better than that if a couple things click. Especially as a lefty. 

I do think Zimmermann has passed him though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ChuckS said:

An above average fastball from the left side and two solid average secondary pitches.  He led the international league in strike outs last year as a 24 year old.  That's not nothing. 

Maybe if you are too lazy to look up stats and scouting reports on minor league players you shouldn't provide such definitive commentary on them.  

He led the international league in walks, too.  In just 112 innings.  He was 6th in the IL in K/9 among pitchers with 10+ starts.  In the 10+ start group he was 27th in the league in ERA.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...