Jump to content

MLBTR: Players Make Counter-Proposal


weams

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Baseball is highly localized, football isn't, at least in part because of gambling (and its cousin, fantasy football).  Except the Yanks/Sox/Dodgers, almost all baseball games draw fewer eyeballs out-of-home-market than MTV's latest series about illiterate homeless 14-year-olds impregnated by Sasquatch.

His name is Daryl!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t think as many people will have baseball on their minds when it is 30 degrees outside. Many big college games are in November as well. LSU-Alabama etc. 

I don’t know what is going to happen with scripted TV either. 

College football (big games) are pretty much limited to one day of the week and MLB goes up against them with its postseason no matter when the postseason is played.   So I don't think college football is really particularly relevant here.   October has almost as many big CFB games as November, the only real difference is the big rivalry games played on the Saturday before Thanksgiving and the Friday and Saturday after Thanksgiving.   But there are plenty of huge games in October every year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the sports stations can show MLB playoff games in the afternoon and evening?   Have start times at 1 and 4.  Ya know...actually let kids watch the  games for a change.  Its not all about prime time, especially for the early early extra special series with the new 6 and 7 seeds?  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

College football (big games) are pretty much limited to one day of the week and MLB goes up against them with its postseason no matter when the postseason is played.   So I don't think college football is really particularly relevant here.   October has almost as many big CFB games as November, the only real difference is the big rivalry games played on the Saturday before Thanksgiving and the Friday and Saturday after Thanksgiving.   But there are plenty of huge games in October every year as well.

True. I still think a lot of this goes back to TV deals. FOX is now a major player in college football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

True. I still think a lot of this goes back to TV deals. FOX is now a major player in college football. 

Maybe have to stagger the postseason schedule so that the World Series has off days on Saturdays then.   In the grand scheme of things I don't think this is a major factor.   We don't even know if all the college football games are going to be played anyway.

Whatever happens -- games in front of no fans or at neutral sites -- it is going to be very different and not what we are used to or what we would want in a perfect world.   

I think if the union and owners can bridge the enormous financial gap between their proposals, the rest of the details won't be that big a deal.   I have my doubts that they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Maybe have to stagger the postseason schedule so that the World Series has off days on Saturdays then.   In the grand scheme of things I don't think this is a major factor.   We don't even know if all the college football games are going to be played anyway.

Whatever happens -- games in front of no fans or at neutral sites -- it is going to be very different and not what we are used to or what we would want in a perfect world.   

I think if the union and owners can bridge the enormous financial gap between their proposals, the rest of the details won't be that big a deal.   I have my doubts that they can.

I will be shocked if we don’t have a season. Would really hurt the sport. 

I figured all along that deferred money would come up. I wasn’t surprised there was a big gap at first. I knew MLB’s first offer the union would spit at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

Maybe the sports stations can show MLB playoff games in the afternoon and evening?   Have start times at 1 and 4.  Ya know...actually let kids watch the  games for a change.  Its not all about prime time, especially for the early early extra special series with the new 6 and 7 seeds?  

Less chance of sub-zero temperature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

I will be shocked if we don’t have a season. Would really hurt the sport. 

I figured all along that deferred money would come up. I wasn’t surprised there was a big gap at first. I knew MLB’s first offer the union would spit at. 

I think both sides low balled their position on things, to give them wiggle room.

But both sides are so far apart, need more than wiggle to compromise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Barret Jackson Autos and droll. :) :)

That's way too depressing.  First, it's almost all 1960s and 1970s muscle cars.  I know, I own a '63 Vette, but I'm not a muscle car guy.  Plus, about once every episode of Barrett Jackson they have a numbers-matching '63 split window that goes for $150k or more, and it just reminds me that I can't sell mine and I don't have the time or money to restore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's way too depressing.  First, it's almost all 1960s and 1970s muscle cars.  I know, I own a '63 Vette, but I'm not a muscle car guy.  Plus, about once every episode of Barrett Jackson they have a numbers-matching '63 split window that goes for $150k or more, and it just reminds me that I can't sell mine and I don't have the time or money to restore it.

Im older than you, so 60 and 70s is right in my wheelhouse (no pun intended).

Every time, my financial situation improves, and I think about buying me something. Dang prices go up again, and I end up sticking the money into home remodeling.

I was laughing with the wife the other day, brought my house in 92, and spent more money remodeling it and adding on to it, then the purchase price. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn’t a real proposal. If the owners wanted more games they would have put it in there proposal. And deferring salary with interest if there are no World Series  is comical.  That does nothing for the owners.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Im older than you, so 60 and 70s is right in my wheelhouse (no pun intended).

Every time, my financial situation improves, and I think about buying me something. Dang prices go up again, and I end up sticking the money into home remodeling.

I was laughing with the wife the other day, brought my house in 92, and spent more money remodeling it and adding on to it, then the purchase price. :)

If I had to do everything over I'd have bought an old Mini or a Citroen 2CV or something more reasonable, that you can fully restore for $20k or $30k, or sometimes even less.  You can buy a nice condition 2CV for $15k.  The split-window looks awesome and about once every three months a delivery guy or plumber or something comes by and says "hey, you have the holy grail!!"  But it doesn't do much good when it doesn't run and will take many tens of thousands of dollars and/or thousands of man hours to fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...