Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Hader is incredible.  I watched him the other day get six outs to seal a win for them.  

I think that every teams fans sit around and think that ONLY their team is the ONLY TEAM EVER to give up on players to have them go on to find greatness somewhere else.  I'm sure if you talked to a fan of the San Francisco Giants he'd tell you all about the litany of players that have been let go/traded from there to find success elsewhere.  

But man, the Orioles have certainly had their share of doozies over the past few years.  Off the top of my head I can think of:

A 50 homer guy

A Cy Young award winner

Best reliever in the game

A 17 game winner

A consistent .850+ OPS 3rd baseman cornerstone of a consistent World Series contender

I know I'm forgetting others but...man, the Orioles have let go of some good ones.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LA2 said:

Hader down to 1.82 ERA. Strop has bulked up and repeatedly called Puig "stupid" after plunking him with a clearly aimed fastball.

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

It was obvious to me at the time, the dude was tired.  We rode him pretty hard and he threw more innings that year than he'd ever had before.  I was pissed that they gave up on him that quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Remember when Pedro Strop was last seen in these parts?  22 innings, 15 walks, 2 HBP, a balk and 5 wild pitches.  He couldn't have hit Puig if he tried.  That was a long time ago.  He's had a pretty good career except the three months he totally lost it and forced the O's to dump him.

I remember and yet, one can still seriously question whether those 22 innings were enough to erase the memory and hope of returning to the level of the 78.67 extraordinary innings Strop had thrown for the O's the previous two seasons. And it's not like he had to go through a 3-5 season odyssey with several teams to find himself again, unlike some of the other Oriole castoffs. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that the O's--not uniquely, of course--just plain stunk at perceiving and fixing the problems of very talented pitchers, whether that was Buck's, his coaches' or Duquette's fault.

The Cubs obviously knew what to do: Strop, without an intervening period of ineptitude, has gone on to rack up SIX straight sub-3.00 ERA seasons in a row as a high-leverage reliever. And we acted as if he was a mere throw-in with Arrieta, based on those 22 innings. (As opposed to how many innings given to Wright, Ubaldo, Gallardo, end-of-the-road Tillman, etc.?)

The Orioles absolutely sucked at judging pitching, it's had very deep and pervasive long-term consequences, and it's going to take a lot to convince me that they've solved the problem, especially since the returns on the late-season dump of 2018 don't seem promising.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It was obvious to me at the time, the dude was tired.  We rode him pretty hard and he threw more innings that year than he'd ever had before.  I was pissed that they gave up on him that quickly.

I guess that could be it.  But in '07 he threw 54.2 innings.  In '09 71.  In '10 he threw 53 innings.  In '11 69.2.  Then in '12 he had a 1.20 ERA in 52 innings on August 15th, then allowed 11 runs in 13 innings (32 baserunners) the rest of the year.  Had the winter off, came back, and pitching low-leverage mopup he gave up 40 baserunners and 19 runs in 22 innings through mid-June. 

I don't know what else you do with a guy who is unpitchable for three-and-a-half months when you're trying to contend.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LA2 said:

I remember and yet, one can still seriously question whether those 22 innings were enough to erase the memory and hope of returning to the level of the 78.67 extraordinary innings Strop had thrown for the O's the previous two seasons. And it's not like he had to go through a 3-5 season odyssey with several teams to find himself again, unlike some of the other Oriole castoffs. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that the O's--not uniquely, of course--just plain stunk at perceiving and fixing the problems of very talented pitchers, whether that was Buck's, his coaches' or Duquette's fault.

The Cubs obviously knew what to do: Strop, without an intervening period of ineptitude, has gone to rack up SIX straight sub-3.00 ERA seasons in a row as a high-leverage reliever. And we acted as if he was a mere throw-in with Arrieta, based on those 22 innings. (As opposed to how many innings given to Wright, Ubaldo, Gallardo, etc.?)

The Orioles absolutely sucked at judging pitching, it's had very deep and pervasive long-term consequences, and it's going to take a lot to convince me that they've solved the problem, especially since the returns on the late-season dump of 2018 don't seem promising.

Yes, it appears he had some kind of an obvious problem the O's couldn't fix (internet go-to: he was tipping his pitches!).  But the Cubs did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I guess that could be it.  But in '07 he threw 54.2 innings.  In '09 71.  In '10 he threw 53 innings.  In '11 69.2.  Then in '12 he had a 1.20 ERA in 52 innings on August 15th, then allowed 11 runs in 13 innings (32 baserunners) the rest of the year.  Had the winter off, came back, and pitching low-leverage mopup he gave up 40 baserunners and 19 runs in 22 innings through mid-June. 

I don't know what else you do with a guy who is unpitchable for three-and-a-half months when you're trying to contend.

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

I think he could have been fatigued.  Most of those prior years were in the minors, or split minors/majors.  If the usage patters and warmups aren't right 52 MLB innings in high-leverage situations on a contender in 4+ months could wear you out.

Although that doesn't explain '13.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I guess I remembered it wrong.  For some reason I thought he'd thrown more innings that year and looked fatigued.  

That trade worked out pretty damn well for the Cubs, I'd say.

Fatigue was mentioned at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yes, it appears he had some kind of an obvious problem the O's couldn't fix (internet go-to: he was tipping his pitches!).  But the Cubs did.

So the O's cdn't pick up on a flaw that several teams' batters did...jeesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I get that McCann’s bat is not ideal in the lineup (on the days that he plays). And Mullins struggled really bad for about 6-7 weeks. And Mateo/Urias are no great shakes themselves. But even with all/each of them getting regular to semi-regular ABs, we have the #1 offense in the sport. Like it literally doesn’t get any better. So how do we “need” another bat. Maybe if Mayo is still here, he comes up at some point and strengthens us even more? But I struggle to understand the idea of us needing more offense, especially when the pitching is this shaky. Do you want Cano (who know looks like he’s lost it) and Perez coming in to try to hold games in the 7th/8th inning only to turn it over to Kimbrel in the 9th in October?  Maybe we defeat SEA/NY and reach a World Series for the first time in over 40 years. How would you like our chances of potentially Ranger Suarez vs Irvin/Kremer/Suarez/Povich for 2 times in a potential 7 game series? Seems like the Phills would have a strong advantage there, no?
    • I'm guessing that without a major technological breakthrough we're getting the 2024 version. Which, in the absence of other information, is his career averages with a bit of age-related decline thrown in. I'm assuming the year-to-year variation we see in his record is mostly random noise overlaid on his basic talent level.
    • I'd argue that they became the evil empire circa 1920, when they were drawing 40% more attendance than anyone else in the league, game-day related revenues were almost all revenues at the time, and so they started to have resources and payroll substantially higher than any other team. In 1920 the Yanks drew 1.3M fans, the A's 0.3M. The A's didn't have a chance until Connie Mack pulled a Mike Elias and assembled arguably the greatest collection of relatively cheap, young talent the game had ever seen.
    • Also, check out Fangraph's Top 45 O's Prospects review of Mayo:  
    • https://www.mlb.com/news/max-scherzer-rangers-mets-trade   The Rangers on the hook for 22.5M total. According to Cots, NY is paying 30M this year, which means the Rangers had to pay 13M this year.  So, the Os or anyone else will probably only have to pay 5ishM by the time they would deal for him. https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-west/texas-rangers/
    • Why not change the bat? The idea that wood bats make sense in the modern era is rather suspect. Give hitters a better weapon and offense will improve. Make the barrel bigger and the bat lighter. Equipment guys could "fit" each hitter like the guys in the Tour equipment trucks do now on the PGA tour. Leave the ball the same. 
    • If you wanted to you could probably write us a white paper on how any number of borderline HOF candidates have not been inducted because the writers are sick of all the Yankees. Like Munson, Nettles, Randolph, Guidry, Bernie Williams, Posada, Mattingly, Pettitte, Schang. Every few years a Baines, Oliva, Hodges, Rice, Cepeda gets in, but not those guys. I'm not going to do that, but feel free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...