Jump to content

Orioles Lose Zach Pop and Grey Fenter in Rule Five


weams

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He was just off out list though we like the upside of him a bit as a reliever. The question was command of his fastball, curveball combo against upper level hitters and his age was becoming a factor. I could see the Orioles being a little aggressive with him and maybe even see how he does against AA hitters this year in a relief role.

I feel like he was in Low A forever. Was it due to stuff or mainly injuries? I can’t remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He was just off out list though we like the upside of him a bit as a reliever. The question was command of his fastball, curveball combo against upper level hitters and his age was becoming a factor. I could see the Orioles being a little aggressive with him and maybe even see how he does against AA hitters this year in a relief role.

They have to be aggressive with him.  Why else would you take him back if you aren’t going to start to put him in a position to help you?  Not like he is some really young guy at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see Pop back on the mound.

In his first outing he was 94-97 with 95 MPH avg with his sinker and 84-85 with his sinker. It took him 21 pitches to get through that first inning.

No data on his outing on the 15th, but I'd say with the way he's throwing, he could very well stick with Florida.

Now, I don't know why Pop was not protected and perhaps it was a gamble by Elias that no teams would take a chance on him because of the lack of anyone seeing him since early 2019. Personally I would have protected Pop over Sulser or Lakins in a heart beat, but again, I don't know all the reasoning. 

If Pop's stays healthy, and his velocity numbers would indicate he is now, he has a much better chance of being a cheap good relief piece who can get groundballs and miss occasional bats in the future than multiple players who were protected by Elias.

If so, then yes, I would agree, this is one of Elias's first roster mistakes when looking at the future.

The only good news in this is that Fangraph's roster resource doesn't have him on their depth chart in the bullpen yet and they're pretty good overall about guessing the depth charts. Saying that, roster resource has Sceroler in the Orioles pen and I'm not buying that.

I hope he finds his way back into the organization, but this does look like an unnecessary risk taken by Elias.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Nice to see Pop back on the mound.

In his first outing he was 94-97 with 95 MPH avg with his sinker and 84-85 with his sinker. It took him 21 pitches to get through that first inning.

No data on his outing on the 15th outing, but I'd say with the way he's throwing, it could very well stick with Florida.

Now, I don't know why Pop was not protected and perhaps it was a gamble by Elias that no teams would take a chance on him because of the lack of anyone seeing him since early 2019. Personally I would have protected Pop over Sulser or Lakins in a heart beat, but again, I don't know all the reasoning. 

If Pop's stays healthy, and his velocity numbers would indicate he is now, he has a much better chance of being a cheap good relief piece who can get groundballs and miss occasional bats in the future than multiple players who were protected by Elias.

If so, then yes, I would agree, this is one of Elias's first roster mistakes when looking at the future.

The only good news in this is that Fangraph's roster resource doesn't have him on their depth chart in the bullpen yet and they're pretty good overall about guessing the depth charts. Saying that, roster resource has Sceroler in the Orioles pen and I'm not buying that.

I hope he finds his way back into the organization, but this does look like an unnecessary risk taken by Elias.

I would have protected him over taking a pair of rule V guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I feel like he was in Low A forever. Was it due to stuff or mainly injuries? I can’t remember.

I was surprised he spent the whole season in Low-A ball in 2019. He was healthy and pitching well and was already long in the tooth for that level and probably could have been pushed to Frederick halfway through the season. One thought was the Orioles were trying to keep him out of the eyes of teams for the Rule pick and then they could be more aggressive with him in 2020. The fact that he was taken (and returned) this year showed that may not have been the best idea but nobody knew the season would be wiped out in 2020. 

As smart as Elias is, I'm sure he's learning about this 40-man roster and rule 5 protection processes as he moves along. This was a weird year because no one saw much of anyone in 2020, so I think that's why you saw so many Rule 5 draft picks this year and why more than usual number amounts may stick. 

Either way, I'm not sure I would have traded Pop for Sceroler or Wells, even though I like Wells a bit and basically that's what he's done if he loses Pop.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They have to be aggressive with him.  Why else would you take him back if you aren’t going to start to put him in a position to help you?  Not like he is some really young guy at this point.

Well obviously skipping a level can be tough since there's a reason you typically move a guy a level at a time because there are lessons to be learned by each level of talent. Age vs level is going to be weird this year because of the missed 2020. It will be interesting to see how Elias ends up placing his players this year after the missed 2020 campaign. Does Henderson get pushed aggressively to Frederick after his good showing in the alternate camp last year or does he go to his natural next level in Bowie? The Orioles have a lot of shortstops that will need playing time between Delmarva and Frederick. Henderson, Westburg, Hernaiz, Servideo, and Ortiz all are current shortstops that need playing time there to decide where their future will be.

But, back to Fenter. I think they should move him to the pen and put him at Bowie and see how he looks. Of course I'm saying this based off my looks at him from 2019 and not what he could look like now. For all I know he picked up a pitch. Where players start 2021 in the minors is going to be fascinating.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Well obviously skipping a level can be tough since there's a reason you typically move a guy a level at a time because there are lessons to be learned by each level of talent. Age vs level is going to be weird this year because of the missed 2020. It will be interesting to see how Elias ends up placing his players this year after the missed 2020 campaign. Does Henderson get pushed aggressively to Frederick after his good showing in the alternate camp last year or does he go to his natural next level in Bowie? The Orioles have a lot of shortstops that will need playing time between Delmarva and Frederick. Henderson, Westburg, Hernaiz, Servideo, and Ortiz all are current shortstops that need playing time there to decide where their future will be.

But, back to Fenter. I think they should move him to the pen and put him at Bowie and see how he looks. Of course I'm saying this based off my looks at him from 2019 and not what he could look like now. For all I know he picked up a pitch. Where players start 2021 in the minors is going to be fascinating.

Do you think that applies so much to guys out of the bullpen?  They go an inning or two at a time and generally only throw two pitches. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Well obviously skipping a level can be tough since there's a reason you typically move a guy a level at a time because there are lessons to be learned by each level of talent. Age vs level is going to be weird this year because of the missed 2020. It will be interesting to see how Elias ends up placing his players this year after the missed 2020 campaign. Does Henderson get pushed aggressively to Frederick after his good showing in the alternate camp last year or does he go to his natural next level in Bowie? The Orioles have a lot of shortstops that will need playing time between Delmarva and Frederick. Henderson, Westburg, Hernaiz, Servideo, and Ortiz all are current shortstops that need playing time there to decide where their future will be.

But, back to Fenter. I think they should move him to the pen and put him at Bowie and see how he looks. Of course I'm saying this based off my looks at him from 2019 and not what he could look like now. For all I know he picked up a pitch. Where players start 2021 in the minors is going to be fascinating.

I’d have some questions if Henderson ends up in Frederick this season. ?

I’m curious too how the rosters are set after the missed season. Part of me feels like they might go “conservative” with stuff at first and bump players up semi early (after first month), since conservative seems to be an Elias standard. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I’d have some questions if Henderson ends up in Frederick this season. ?

I’m curious too how the rosters are set after the missed season. Part of me feels like they might go “conservative” with stuff at first and bump players up semi early (after first month), since conservative seems to be an Elias standard. 

Generally, I think he will be conservative with the higher end high school guys like Henderson, Grayson Rodriguez, DL Hall, Adam Hall or guys with higher ceilings. I think he’ll be apt to move up college guys like Cadyn Grenier, AJ Graffanino, Terrin Vavra, and some of the college arms from the 2019 draft. Take a little more time for the higher ceiling guys that could really benefit from the more gradual initial progression. Some of the moderate ceiling/moderate floor guys will be pushed up some. 
 

I like the idea of Fenter in the Bowie pen. It should be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Generally, I think he will be conservative with the higher end high school guys like Henderson, Grayson Rodriguez, DL Hall, Adam Hall or guys with higher ceilings. I think he’ll be apt to move up college guys like Cadyn Grenier, AJ Graffanino, Terrin Vavra, and some of the college arms from the 2019 draft. Take a little more time for the higher ceiling guys that could really benefit from the more gradual initial progression. Some of the moderate ceiling/moderate floor guys will be pushed up some. 
 

I like the idea of Fenter in the Bowie pen. It should be interesting. 

Here’s hoping you are wrong about those guys, especially DL Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Here’s hoping you are wrong about those guys, especially DL Hall.

Not knowing how they valued his work in Bowie last year, just my guess. Elias has shown to be conservative with his talent. If DL starts in AA, would that be too conservative though? I mean he has no time there yet. I will be disappointed if DL is not in Norfolk by mid July or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
    • McDermott has a WHIP of almost 1.5 and has walked 41 batters in 64 and 2/3 innings. I'm not sure how that plays at the Big League level or how anyone could have a lot of confidence that those numbers translate into the kind of shut down backend reliever that we need.
    • I would be not surprised at all if McDermott deloads after the all star break and comes up to use as a reliever a la do hall the last few years. He’s basically tanner Scott without having to give up prospects to get. 
    • I don't want anything for Grayson. We are trying to win and add, not subtract from areas of strength. We can add a a 2/3ish starter for less than Holliday and Kjerstad. We have plenty of players/prospects that we can trade that other teams want. After all, we have the best farm system in the game. Just because the player(s) is/are not the #1 prospect in the sport, it doesn't make him/them spare parts.
    • I'm surprised the O's haven't tried McDermott as a reliever yet.  Some posters have said the O's need 3 relievers.  There is no way the O's are trading for 3 relievers.  They might trade for 1, find one in the minors and claim one off the waiver wire. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...