Jump to content

The second guessing Hyde thread.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

If I were to have a complaint about how Hyde (and basically every manager does this) is a slave to matchups. He sees lefty vs lefty and often goes with a pinch hitter or something like that even if the numbers say not to do that. 
 

I would like for him to pay more attention to the idea that someone like say, Kjerstad, tore up lefties in the minors and not be such a slave to the lefty/lefty issue.

But again, every manager does stuff like that, which is annoying and why there is such little difference between in game managerial decision making.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

If I were to have a complaint about how Hyde (and basically every manager does this) is a slave to matchups. He sees lefty vs lefty and often goes with a pinch hitter or something like that even if the numbers say not to do that. 
 

I would like for him to pay more attention to the idea that someone like say, Kjerstad, tore up lefties in the minors and not be such a slave to the lefty/lefty issue.

But again, every manager does stuff like that, which is annoying and why there is such little difference between in game managerial decision making.

I do think Hyde can be a little rigid that way.  On the other hand, there’s a big difference between hitting AA/AAA lefties and hitting major league lefties, especially the ones who basically make their livings getting left handed hitters out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I do think Hyde can be a little rigid that way.  On the other hand, there’s a big difference between hitting AA/AAA lefties and hitting major league lefties, especially the ones who basically make their livings getting left handed hitters out.  

Sure but success is success and approach is approach and if you don’t give them a chance, they can’t show what they can do.

He kept giving Henderson a chance and said, he just hasn’t seen many lefties, so he will get better. He gave him the benefit of the doubt despite the numbers saying otherwise. He should be doing the same with others until proven differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure but success is success and approach is approach and if you don’t give them a chance, they can’t show what they can do.

He kept giving Henderson a chance and said, he just hasn’t seen many lefties, so he will get better. He gave him the benefit of the doubt despite the numbers saying otherwise. He should be doing the same with others until proven differently.

Even with Henderson, he’s sat 25% of the time vs. LH starters and only 3% of the time vs. RH starters.   Granted, if I looked at July - Sept., I doubt Gunnar has sat sat against many lefties.   

Anyway, like I said, I agree Hyde has been a little inflexible.   On the other hand, he has a roster that is well designed to allow him to take advantage of platooning.  Sometimes it’s not about the limitations of the guy who’s sitting, but the strengths of the guy who’s playing.  FWIW, the O’s have a 103 sOPS+ (split relative to the league average) vs. RHP, and 107 OPS+ vs. LHP.   So I may not agree with every decision Hyde makes on this front, but it generally has worked.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Infield in with a 2 run lead in the 6th?

I did not like that call either. It was also quite early in the game where the last thing you want to do is give them a big inning, which is what happened. I get it if you are down 1 or 2 and you really don't want to let in an additional run but the risk/reward doesn't seem worth it when you have the lead, much less up two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Yep, I don't think the stats would support this, especially considering the present state of the O's bullpen

And didn't they initially play the infield back and then moved it up when the count got to two strikes in the sixth? That was a weird decision and I think the damage would have been more limited without making that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general Hyde has clearly done well. Managers make many decisions that look good when they pan out and of course look poor when they don’t. 
 

He has really done a nice job keeping these guys on an even keel. Of course most managers look good when their teams plate on a 100 win pace. 
 

I always thought he would be here until they were competitive and then someone else would be brought in. But I am happy with him and the job he has done. No manager is right all the time. 
 

There are many things we have questioned from Frazier to Ohearn to Mateo. All in all, his way has been the right way. The new Oriole Way. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

Yep, I don't think the stats would support this, especially considering the present state of the O's bullpen

I think the current state of the bullpen is exactly why he would do it.   He didn’t want to concede a run which would have cut the lead to one.  Convention says you concede the run to try and avoid the big inning.  He went against convention because he wanted as big a lead as possible for his bullpen.  He gambled and lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think the current state of the bullpen is exactly why he would do it.   He didn’t want to concede a run which would have cut the lead to one.  Convention says you concede the run to try and avoid the big inning.  He went against convention because he wanted as big a lead as possible for his bullpen.  He gambled and lost.

I'm hoping there is budget to add a bullpen arm or two via free agency or trade for next season. No one wants Bautista to miss next season, but odd are he's missing significant time at a minimum.

This will be a good test for JA's willingness to add payroll, but we'll end up hearing him whine about revenue streams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If I was a team owner, and my GM radically altered his plan in response to a four-game losing streak that didn't take us out of contention, I'd fire him on the spot. Four games in June tells us nothing other than the team is going through a rough patch.
    • Looking at some of the Marlins starters statcast data, it’s funny how all of them seem to have a lot of subpar data. I wonder if there is something in how the Marlins are teaching them?
    • I doubt that will be the rotation. 
    • Grayson, Kremer, Irvin, Povich, McDermott.   YES!!!
    • The title of this thread is pretty ridiculous. We have no idea how people rate the rest of the system.  There was a prospect guy (not sure who it was) on MLb Network a few weeks ago that was saying the Os 15th prospect is a top 5 guy in several organizations. What I would say is if the Os aren’t willing to deal any of their top 3 (hope so) and don’t want to trade Kjerstad, they will struggle to put together an offer to get a TOR guy, if one is even available. I think that’s fair to say.
    • Cleveland arrives off a hot week where they gained AL1 position over the Eastern leaders. Team Stats - their RP are 1st of 30 by fWAR, and their SP are 30th of 30 by fWAR, so pitching that is as 2014 Royals vibe as it gets.     Tanner Bibee is the only one out of the Bieber-Bibee-Gavin Williams top of rotation plan to be present in midseason, and he leads off the series. Steven Kwan has taken the baton from Luis Arraez.    Adley's college teammate's .400 quest will snowball as a story if he stays in range after the All-Star break. David Fry is maybe the league's most random fantastic year out of nowhere, but he made a midgame exit yesterday. For a change they are not leading the league in lowest K%, but they are still Top 5.     Their offensive style has for a lot of years anchored on contact skill, but they don't hit for much power. Jose Ramirez is doing that Marcus Semien thing just stacking those big seasons into the early 30's racing up the Hall of Fame credentials ladder. I don't believe CLE overall is near as strong as BAL-NYY but they have banked a lot of wins.    Their 75 team games YTD is the MLB low, so a lot of offdays and/or rainouts, but a lot of grind ahead for those top relievers who have already been taxed a lot this season.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...