Jump to content

2021 2nd round pick (41): Connor Norby - 2B - (Junior) East Carolina University


Recommended Posts

Just now, waynebug said:

mlb.com has Norby as the # 58 prospect.  We used the 41st pick on the 58th prospect.

We're about to pick again 65 or 66.

If you read the thread, Fangraphs and Keith Law had him at #25. None of those rankings are gospel and the Orioles obviously have their own list.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waynebug said:

mlb.com has Norby as the # 58 prospect.  We used the 41st pick on the 58th prospect.

We're about to pick again 65 or 66.

And Keith Law and Fangraphs both had him a 25. CBS has him a 32. MLB.com seems to be the lowest on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Norby seems like a solid although uninspiring pick.  There is a lot of high upside HS talent sitting there and the O's passed on it.  I am sure we will be told that the HS kid we take in R4 is every bit as good though.

I like that he is a college bat though.  Maybe Elias will promote him to AA by 2024!

O's are going to need to start trading some of these MIers they are accumulating.

We have to get pitchers somewhere, if we aren't going to draft them I guess we have to trade for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Pirates went underslot with the 1st pick and have now taken 2 high upside HS players.  This is what you do when you go underslot.

They've taken a quarterback and a wide receiver.   They still need some help on the offensive line.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cowser and Norby both go to Tier 1 with Rutschman as candidate Orioles batters to control the strike zone as the team improves.

Be interesting to see if Norby can play at a Henderson/Westburg level and threaten to make Vavra, Jones and all other comers utility types.   I still don't know if there's a SS there, but another pillar underneath the floor of the rest of the infield on an Adley-friendly timeline.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OrioleDog said:

I think Cowser and Norby both go to Tier 1 with Rutschman as candidate Orioles batters to control the strike zone as the team improves.

Be interesting to see if Norby can play at a Henderson/Westburg level and threaten to make Vavra, Jones and all other comers utility types.   I still don't know if there's a SS there, but another pillar underneath the floor of the rest of the infield on an Adley-friendly timeline.

I'm no expert, but I really like this pick too. Seems almost like a plug and play guy. Good approach. Second baseman of the future type of fella. I also love his quote guaranteeing he'll be in the pros. Not sure what Sig's data does to account for character, but that's a positive in my world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

They are almost certainly going to spend pretty much all of the draft slot value, so getting worked up over where they go overslot seems silly.

We'll see. Will Taylor and Bubba Chandler are still on the board. If one of those is the pick at #65 would you be happy?

Bump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

Hey, Taylor is still available!

I will be right there with you storming the warehouse if they don't spend the draft pool allotment. 

They'll spend it, but I don't think some massive over slot is coming. I think they think more highly of the guys we drafted than the rankers do.

Hopefully 1 good over slot guy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...