Jump to content

The O's could theoretically start the fastest lineup in all of baseball


interloper

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Camden_yardbird said:

One of the most exciting teams I ever saw was the Marlins 2003 WS team with Juan Pierre and Luis Castillo at the top of the lineup.

With 68/21 SB and .361/.381 OBPs respectively it seemed like in those playoffs that the Marlins always had one of their top 2 players on and in scoring position for Derek Lee or Mike Lowell to drive in.

The 2014 Royals were pretty nuts. Almost three players with 30 steals (Cain 28, Escobar 31, and Dyon 36 off the bench) plus two more starters with double digits (Gordon and Aoki). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

The 2014 Royals were pretty nuts. Almost three players with 30 steals (Cain 28, Escobar 31, and Dyon 36 off the bench) plus two more starters with double digits (Gordon and Aoki). 

We don't speak of such team on this site.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is about the time Drungo would chime in that the 1887 St. Louis Browns stole 581 bases in one season.   But I’ll do it for him.  

More recently, the 1976 Oakland A’s stole 341 bases.  When I read that, my mind went immediately to Rickey Henderson, but he hadn’t started playing yet.   That team had three players who stole 50+ bases: Bill North (75), Bert Campaneris (54) and Don Baylor (52), acquired from the Orioles that year.  They also had three other players who stole 30+ and another two who stole 20.    Several of those guys weren’t burners, either.   

The 1985 Cardinals were the team that came immediately to mind for me, but they “only” stole 314 bases, 110 by Vince Coleman.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be sound strategy to move the fences out at Camden Yards to take full advantage of this speed and exploit the devaluation of speed in the market with everyone looking for power. Zigging while everyone else is zagging. It would really come in handy too if they ever bring in the rule that would allow you to take off for first on any wild pitch/passed ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

This is about the time Drungo would chime in that the 1887 St. Louis Browns stole 581 bases in one season.   But I’ll do it for him.  

More recently, the 1976 Oakland A’s stole 341 bases.  When I read that, my mind went immediately to Rickey Henderson, but he hadn’t started playing yet.   That team had three players who stole 50+ bases: Bill North (75), Bert Campaneris (54) and Don Baylor (52), acquired from the Orioles that year.  They also had three other players who stole 30+ and another two who stole 20.    Several of those guys weren’t burners, either.   

The 1985 Cardinals were the team that came immediately to mind for me, but they “only” stole 314 bases, 110 by Vince Coleman.   
 

Speaking of Baylor, he was an absolute freak of an athlete.  He and Bobby Grich came up together in the O's organization and put up absurd numbers before getting the call to Baltimore in 1970.  Too bad both put up their biggest power number with the Angels in the steroid era.  I think Baylor's power was already established before then, and he finished his career is 338 homers, 285 steals, and an amazing 267 HBP's.  Check out the 1979 stats for Baylor and Grich - amazing numbers.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, vab said:

It would be sound strategy to move the fences out at Camden Yards to take full advantage of this speed and exploit the devaluation of speed in the market with everyone looking for power. Zigging while everyone else is zagging. It would really come in handy too if they ever bring in the rule that would allow you to take off for first on any wild pitch/passed ball. 



Move the fences back 20 feet in the off season and have a fast lineup, plus the pitching would vastly improve and the outfielders have blazing speed.  That would be fun to watch.  It’s not like they would miss the lost seats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

High contact, low power guys and speed are currently undervalued assets in the game. It would be interesting to see those pursued and see what happens though as others have pointed out, the Orioles park isn't the best for that strategy. 

Still, I'd love to see a speedy lineup every day with some steals and excitement on the base paths. It would at least provide some excitement in the inevitable losses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sevastras said:



Move the fences back 20 feet in the off season and have a fast lineup, plus the pitching would vastly improve and the outfielders have blazing speed.  That would be fun to watch.  It’s not like they would miss the lost seats. 

Interesting.  We need creative thinking to compete with bigger markets, and that's a good one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

This is about the time Drungo would chime in that the 1887 St. Louis Browns stole 581 bases in one season.   But I’ll do it for him.  

More recently, the 1976 Oakland A’s stole 341 bases.  When I read that, my mind went immediately to Rickey Henderson, but he hadn’t started playing yet.   That team had three players who stole 50+ bases: Bill North (75), Bert Campaneris (54) and Don Baylor (52), acquired from the Orioles that year.  They also had three other players who stole 30+ and another two who stole 20.    Several of those guys weren’t burners, either.   

The 1985 Cardinals were the team that came immediately to mind for me, but they “only” stole 314 bases, 110 by Vince Coleman.   
 

The '85 Cardinals stole 314 bases as a team.  They had a quick lineup.  Vince Coleman stole 110. Willie McGee 56, Andy Van Slyke 34, Tommy Herr and Ozzie Smith each had 31.  I remember that team being a bunch of rabbits and Jack Clark.  But when I look at the stats, Clark only had 22 home runs that year - which was the team lead.  They still managed to win 101 games that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
    • I feel like I asked once years ago, but can someone please explain the acronym “MFY?”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...