Jump to content

Saturday, August 28: John Means faces the Rays, O's on brink of mathematical elimination from playoffs


SteveA

Recommended Posts

Gametime:  7:05 pm

Forecast:  Around 80, pleasant

Promotion:  Orioles Naval Academy Themed Ballcap

Matchup Michael Wacha (R) vs John Means (L)

Lineups

1. Randy Arozarena (R) LF
2. Nelson Cruz (R) DH
3. Wander Franco (S) SS
4. Yandy Diaz (R) 3B
5. Brandon Lowe (L) 2B
6. Manuel Margot (R) RF
7. Jordan Luplow (R) 1B
8. Francisco Mejia (S) C
9. Kevin Kiermaier (L) CF
 
1. Cedric Mullins (L) CF
2. Ryan Mountcastle (R) 1B
3. Anthony Santander (S) RF
4. Trey Mancini (R) DH
5. DJ Stewart (L) LF
6. Ramon Urias (R) SS
7. Pedro Severino (R) C
8. Jorge Mateo (R) 2B
9. Kelvin Gutierrez (R) 3B

Orioles Bench
Austin Hays (R)
Jahmai Jones (R)
Austin Wynns (R)


Bullpen Availability

Available
    Fernando Abad* 3.1 IP, 42p Tuesday

    Paul Fry* 1.0 IP, 19p Tuesday
    Conner Greene 2.0 IP, 19p Wednesday

    Cole Sulser 1.0 IP, 18p Wednesday
    Dillon Tate 1.1 IP, 19p Wednesday

    Tyler Wells 1.0 IP, 10p Wednesday

Maybe Available

    Chris Ellis 3.0 IP, 38p Wednesday
    Jorge Lopez 2.0 IP, 28p Thursday

Not Available
    Marcos Diplan 2.0 IP, 23p last night;  0.0 IP, 14p Wednesday; 1.1 IP, 22p Tuesday

    Tanner Scott* 1.0 IP, 2tp last night;  0.1 IP, 13p Wednesday 

*denotes lefthanded pitcher

NOTE:  One of these guys could be held out in expectation of starting Tuesday in Toronto, perhaps Ellis

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SteveA changed the title to Saturday, August 28: John Means faces the Rays, O's on brink of mathematical elimination from playoffs
9 minutes ago, scOtt said:

Is it game on tonight? 70 miles out, it's raining here and I just saw lightning out the corner of my eye.

 

Assuming... it'll just be a summer storm (front) that is passed thru by gametime...

I'm about 8 miles from OPACY and it's bright and sunny out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re the thread title, I think we probably already are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs.   While it’s possible for any of 12 teams to fail to reach 76 wins, it’s not possible for all 12 teams to lose all their games, because they play each other and somebody has to win.  I’d have to do a bit of heavy lifting, but I’d say it’s 100% mathematically certain at this point that at least 5 teams will win 76+ games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Re the thread title, I think we probably already are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs.   While it’s possible for any of 12 teams to fail to reach 76 wins, it’s not possible for all 12 teams to lose all their games, because they play each other and somebody has to win.  I’d have to do a bit of heavy lifting, but I’d say it’s 100% mathematically certain at this point that at least 5 teams will win 76+ games.   

Give me more credit.  I did the heavy lifting.  Boston and Toronto only have 3 more.  Oakland and Seattle have 7 more, and Oakland has 3 with Boston   It barely works out, but you can still keep everyone to 75 or less.  Although I think one or maybe two wins by Boston, Oakland, or Seattle would eliminate us even if we win.  They are all playing now and right now none of them is winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Of course I’ll be watching. Filled with dread in all likelihood. As will most of us.  LOL. 
    • Very interesting to read through this. Full of optimism…those were good times. Turns out I voted 91-94. Such pessimism…grrr…and even that was too little. Several of the posters should run out and buy lottery tickets because they are definitely prescient.
    • During all the hullabaloo about the team floundering, way too little was said about fundamental baseball judgement and defense. In a game a couple days ago, a guy came up to bat with runners on. This guy is all speed and defense, with no power, and bunted for a single. The radio guys pointed out that with a bunt threat at the plate, the defense moves in to anticipate the bunt, but this wasn’t done. He barely beat out the throw. Even two steps in from the defense would have been the difference. Little flubs like that happen CONSTANTLY, and don’t count as errors, but good teams avoid them without even thinking. The OF collision two days ago. Why did that happen? It shouldn’t have, and wouldn’t have with a good team, yet we’ve had at least three, two of which resulted in serious injury. Westburg and Urias are both solid players with solid fundamentals. Even if they don’t blaze away at the plate, they haven’t forgotten their defense, and we can hope that will be enough to get us to 90 wins.
    • The Boys are back and you're going to be in trouble.  Hey-la Hey-la. The Boys are back.
    • I was just reading my unread posts in the thread, and didn’t notice that your post was a week old.   And I don’t consider that I called you out.  The post sort of read like the outcome of the playoffs was so certain that there was no point in watching, so I was ribbing you about it.  Nothing personal intended. I have a feeling you’ll be watching!   
    • I was expecting Boston to be last and NY to be fourth…I never expected the Jays to be as bad as they’ve been, and the Rays are always good.
    • Fewer than 3% of our posters thought the O’s would win under 90 games this year.  They can still win 90, but it will take a 4-3 finish or better to do it.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...