Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I am far more certain about that than you are.  I believe that if the owners ended the lockout now and there was no CBA in place by September, the players would strike then and threaten the playoffs.  The owners figured there would be a work stoppage and decide to control the timing of that stoppage.  I’m not pro owner, but I don’t blame them for taking that step.

I didn’t say I blamed them.   From a fan’s perspective, I’d rather miss games at the beginning of the season than at the end.    And of course, I’d rather miss no games at all.   I do blame the owners for going 43 days before making their initial offer.    But there’s plenty of blame to go around for how these negotiations have been conducted.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question. If this drags out, do you think the union will try to negatively influence/affect minor league play in any way as a pressure tactic? Do they have any way to even do that. I see this getting uglier. I am looking forward to the start of the minor league season - IT"S BASEBALL  -  ORIOLE BASEBALL!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So?

Doesn't mean they would be opposed to playing out the season under the current deal.

Or they could sign the paper in front of them and just play ball.

Now, that's not a fair expectation, but neither is putting all the blame on the owners, regardless of the lockout.

As said above, there's plenty of blame to go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s still the owners who have stopped the season from progressing in the normal way.   I’m not saying that because I side with the players in the negotiation, it’s just the fact.  If the owners hadn’t imposed a lockout, would the players have staged a strike?   Maybe, but we don’t really know.   

I don't think we really disagree about the situation.

Both parties shoulder blame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

So they plan on having a week of daily negotiations to try and get an agreement by the 28th. Not ideal, unless you think a month of spring training is plenty of time. 

For established players?  Sure its enough.

Young guys that are on the 40, like Hall. Those it will hurt a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A plague on both their houses.  Pun (or whatever it is) fully intended.

SEC baseball begins February 18 and I live 20 miles from Vanderbilt.  The sport will be considerably more engaging than watching multi-millionaires argue with billionaires about whose grievance is more worthy of relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized that the union's initial proposal was for all players to hit arbitration after 2 years.  The pre-arbitration money was to split among year 1 and 2 players.  The owner's proposal was no change to super 2's, I believe, and $10 million in pre arbitration money to players in year 1, 2, and 3.  The sides aren't on the same page, they might not even be in the same book.  I can't see this being resolved any time soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jabba72 said:

So they plan on having a week of daily negotiations to try and get an agreement by the 28th. Not ideal, unless you think a month of spring training is plenty of time. 

I've got a contrarian take on all of this...

It's normal. There's a time for business and there's a time for games. This is a time for business. It doesn't mean that they don't love the game. It doesn't mean that either side is greedier than the other. It doesn't mean they don't care about fans. It's just a scheduled time to divvy up billions of dollars.

Why not sooner? Because it's a negotiation, not a playground game. Negotiations are often deadline driven. It's why the trade deadline is often craziest in the hours before it passes. And this isn't a matter of public safety like some master labor negotiations. It's about a game. 

So what's happening isn't indicative of anything in my opinion other than two parties handling their business on a very predictable timeline. It's quite possible that one holds out and is willing to lose some games, but I'd say unlikely this go around. If it does happen, the delay will be short.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

It seems like each side feels they will gain the advantage once regular season games are at risk, so neither side is motivated to push this along.   The pace is really maddening.   

I agree. Right now, they are just thinking, we'll miss some spring training games (which honestly are too many and go on for too long) so they have no interest in moving off their positions. I do however think mediation could help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NCRaven said:

I am far more certain about that than you are.  I believe that if the owners ended the lockout now and there was no CBA in place by September, the players would strike then and threaten the playoffs.  The owners figured there would be a work stoppage and decide to control the timing of that stoppage.  I’m not pro owner, but I don’t blame them for taking that step.

After what the MLBPA pulled in 2004, the owners can never allow a possibility of a mid-season strike again. As far apart as they are in their positions, a lockout made the most sense from their perspective.

While I've been critical of the MLBPA, and rightly so in my opinion, the owners have to realize that they need to get more money into the hands of the producing young players if they want a system that won't force them into signing mediocre middle aged players for insane amounts. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why was only Judge mentioned if it's obvious? Don't make stupid omissions don't get obvious fact checked.
    • Wieters had a career fWAR of 15.5. Adley is at 14.3 in less than 3 seasons. Its Adley…by a mile.
    • Santander is a low OBP, poor BA, mediocre fielder with very little base running value player.   He has great power and can carry a team. He’s a really good dude, solid in the clubhouse and a great representative for your franchise. In many ways, he is exactly like Trumbo even if he is the better player.  And even if he doesn’t fall off as dramatically as Trumbo did, he’s still very likely to fall off.    For what he will cost, you can bring in some solid pitching. Next years offense, barring any trades, should look something like this: 1st-Mayo, 2nd- Holliday, SS- Gunnar, 3rd- Westburg C- Adley OF- Kjerstad and Cowser Basallo potentially ready by midseason or so. That leaves you with decisions on Mountcastle, Mullins and OHearn and I guess Santander. You need to get right handed. Mounty is a righty but unless you are moving Mayo to the OF, you need him to play first. Do you keep Mounty around to be a 1st/DH if Mayo is also going to play the OF?  Maybe. Some RH bats to consider: Tyler O’Neill. Having a really nice year.  Strong arm in the OF but struggles out there otherwise. Not a great fit for OPACY LF. JD Martinez: Still can hit but zero versatility. In a game that values that, do you want to sign someone who doesn’t give you any?  On the Os, it may be ok but I tend to doubt they would. Duvall: Good defensive player. Abysmal with the bat this year but was very good last year. buy low guy who could provide some bench value. Robert: Been awful this year and had injury issues in the past. WS have already said they will trim payroll after this year. There are very few ways for them to do that, especially since Benintendi has no value. Robert will be made available. Great spend, very good in the OF and still a tremendous offensive upside. He will cost a lot less to acquire than last offseason.  The Os reportedly were interested in him before. Teams like the Dodgers and Mariners were linked to him at the deadline. There will be competition for him and maybe the Os don’t have the same depth to trade out of that they did in the past, so it may be tough but they should look into it.
    • Captain obvious enters the room
    • Gunnar got his 20th SB the other day.  I was curious and looked at his sprint speed vs Ohtani.  His is 28.8 vs 28.1 for Ohtani.  It made me appreciate even more Ohtani’s 50SBs. 
    • Please do.   Zero people have said don’t spend money. You are lying. 
    • I see we now have 23 people that have lost their mind. 😂 well, I don’t think they’ll be a 24th.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...