Jump to content

Will Adley Rutschman be on the Opening Day roster?


Frobby

Will Adley Rutschman be on the Opening Day roster?  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Adley Rutschman be on the Opening Day roster


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/06/22 at 02:19

Recommended Posts

Just now, interloper said:

I would settle for one televised spring game featuring Adley before ST wraps. Not even sure that's a possibility, especially with the lack of overall televised games, but all I wanted was to get eyes on him in a few ABs this spring. Sometimes it seems even the most basic things are too much to ask. Ah, the life of an Os fan.

I'm not sure he will even be back before ST ends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, maybenxtyr said:

I'm not sure he will even be back before ST ends. 

This poll was started before he got hurt. Since it’s now pretty obvious that he won’t be on the OD roster due to his injury, I’ve closed the poll now.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Connolly said this morning on the radio that he thinks Rutschman was going to start on day 1 in Baltimore if not for the injury.

Easy to say now that he's injured and that won't be happening, but somewhat interesting nonetheless.

Wouldn't it have been a no brainer?  He'll have a legitimate shot of placing in the RoY top 2 and get a full year of service anyway.  And if he was on the opening day roster you get an extra draft pick and all the extra bonus pool money that comes along with a top 3 RoY finish.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, geschinger said:

Wouldn't it have been a no brainer?  He'll have a legitimate shot of placing in the RoY top 2 and get a full year of service anyway.  And if he was on the opening day roster you get an extra draft pick and all the extra bonus pool money that comes along with a top 3 RoY finish.  

About 40% of the people in this poll didn't think it was a no brainer.

To me it would have made perfect sense to wait 2 weeks in the hopes of getting the extra year. If he was good enough to get all of those ROY votes, you lose the year and you just accept that. If he wasn't for whatever reason, at least you got that extra year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

About 40% of the people in this poll didn't think it was a no brainer.

To me it would have made perfect sense to wait 2 weeks in the hopes of getting the extra year. If he was good enough to get all of those ROY votes, you lose the year and you just accept that. If he wasn't for whatever reason, at least you got that extra year.

That is the stick, what about the carrot?  Surely the number one overall prospect in baseball has decent odds of bringing back the reward of one of the extra draft picks.  My understanding of where those bonus picks end up in the draft that would have been the pick and additional draft pool money to add an additional Gunnar Henderson or Jordan Wesburg caliber pick to the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, geschinger said:

That is the stick, what about the carrot?  Surely the number one overall prospect in baseball has decent odds of bringing back the reward of one of the extra draft picks.  My understanding of where those bonus picks end up in the draft that would have been the pick and additional draft pool money to add an additional Gunnar Henderson or Jordan Wesburg caliber pick to the system.

I have no idea what the odds of him being a top 3 ROY are.

What if he gets injured and misses 6 weeks during the season?

What if other rookies come up in big media markets and get more hype?

What if other rookies play for actual contenders and have more meaningful production?

What if the O's are a laughing stock, the manager gets fired and everyone is brought down by that?

What if Stowers and Rodriguez, on our own team, out perform him?

I'd rather they try to get the year and adjust if it doesn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I have no idea what the odds of him being a top 3 ROY are.

What if he gets injured and misses 6 weeks during the season?

What if other rookies come up in big media markets and get more hype?

What if other rookies play for actual contenders and have more meaningful production?

What if the O's are a laughing stock, the manager gets fired and everyone is brought down by that?

What if Stowers and Rodriguez, on our own team, out perform him?

I'd rather they try to get the year and adjust if it doesn't happen.

There is alway the chance he gets injured which he did which takes the potential carrot away. 

But if not, looking at the top 3 from the last couple of years (3rd place finisher played 70 and 81 games in 21/19)  If he's anywhere near as good as advertised chances are significant that he's getting a full year of service anyway and we would have thrown away a compensatory pick and additional $2m in draft pool money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, geschinger said:

There is alway the chance he gets injured which he did which takes the potential carrot away. 

But if not, looking at the top 3 from the last couple of years (3rd place finisher played 70 and 81 games in 21/19)  If he's anywhere near as good as advertised chances are significant that he's getting a full year of service anyway and we would have thrown away a compensatory pick and additional $2m in draft pool money. 

I don't know the answer, but I'm sure Sig could cook up a formula that incorporates the value of 2+ weeks of Rutschman in his rookie year, the expected value of Rutschman's extra year, the probability of Rutschman being top 3 in ROY voting and the expected value of a compensatory draft pick and make an informed decision about whether to hold him back or not. 

Don't have to worry about that now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rutschman is a complete, franchise-altering prospect, and one of the most exciting young players in the entire sport. He’s a switch-hitter with a hit/power combination that would probably make him an All-Star anywhere on the diamond, while also being a plus defender at the most demanding position in baseball, and an intense, vocal, charismatic leader.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2022-top-100-prospects/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Il BuonO said:

Rutschman is a complete, franchise-altering prospect, and one of the most exciting young players in the entire sport. He’s a switch-hitter with a hit/power combination that would probably make him an All-Star anywhere on the diamond, while also being a plus defender at the most demanding position in baseball, and an intense, vocal, charismatic leader.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2022-top-100-prospects/

Rutschman isn't young, harper guerrero machado soto acuna etc all debuted 5 years younger than he is

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The age is certainly part of it.  But the larger part is he only hits home runs, and don't bring anything else tangible to the team.  Doesn't get on base well, doesn't have speed on the basepaths and plays a below average outfield.  Power wise he's very good and solid, at least this year which is an outlier compared to his others, but there is nothing else he does well.  He does have the advantage of being a switch hitter which is a big bonus, especially with Hyde and his obsession with lefty/righty matchups, but that only goes so far.  If he brought more to the table, then the age wouldn't matter as much, as if the power drops off he could be helpful in other ways.  But he doesn't, and that's the main reason I wouldn't sign him to a deal.  Age is A factor, but for me the type of player he is contributes more.   I agree that the market will give him too many years.  I don't care about the money so much, but I think anything beyond a couple 2-3 years is a bad idea.  I want to see us spend, but I want to see us spend wisely.  No more Davis/Trumbo type deals.  Spend the money on players that deserve it, not one dimensional players who are very likely to age poorly.  Santander was a great success story and it was one of the best rule V picks ever.  But it's time to let some other team pay for his decline, as I really don't see a Cruz type future for him.  
    • Agreed. So to put it very simply, if we win 2/3 and the Twins lose 2/3 this weekend we are IN.
    • There’s going to be a lot of healthy discussion about how to spend our money. MLBTraderumors has already started. Here’s the O’Hearn paragraph from their article about picking up options( on Jimenez’ option, they said”haha no”)
    • The tiebreakers are weird because we could get 2 wins vs Tigers/Twins and clinch the playoff spot but could also get 3 wins and not make the playoffs.  
    • Nope.  Too many years.  I agree with giving him the QO and letting him walk.  I might entertain a 2-3 year deal, but that's the most I'd go.
    • Yes I should have said by inter division we hold tie breaker on both if head to head.  3 way tie we would finish ahead of Tigers but behind Twins but still get in.   So the magic number is really 5 but with asterisk on that because it could be 4 with the right 2 wins vs Tigers or Twins.  
    • Whatever seems to be possibly ailing Adley, IMO looks like it only affects him when hitting.  He sprang up outta his crouch like a Jack-in-the-Box and hustled for that foul pop/bunt yesterday and did not look like he was suffering any ill effects. But what do I know?  🤔🤣  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...