Jump to content

Expansion Team in Nashville?


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

the youngsters, seam to have no interest in professional baseball, nor do they play in rec sports like they used to.

 

Obviously one can find dozens of stories about how the sky is falling.

Some of them are over a hundred years old.

You also have this.

Quote

When it comes to baseball’s popularity with younger fans, one can’t simply look at their TV viewing habits to determine if they like baseball or not. Younger fans follow sports, especially baseball, via the Internet, e.g., watching highlights on social media and various websites. Gen Z fans (those born in 1997 or later) follow their favorite sport over the Internet twice as often as Baby Boomers. They’re also three times more likely to listen to podcasts and play fantasy sports than Boomers. When it comes to Gen Z’s favorite sport, MLB is even with the NFL. That’s shocking I’m sure to baseball’s doomsayers.

It’s important to remember that Gen Z is the first generation of digital natives. These young fans thrive on digital media options when it comes to following their sports teams. For example, MLB’s At Bat mobile app is very popular with young fans. It puts baseball online, where young fans spend a lot of their time. Moreover, baseball is the sport most into data analytics, which appeals to a lot of young fans. And there are a ton of websites devoted to baseball analytics.

https://www.leagueoffans.org/2019/10/29/gen-z-is-killing-the-myth-that-young-people-dont-like-baseball/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Revenue is up, franchise values are up.  They just signed a new deal with Apple.

I wonder if/how the Apple deal cannibalizes other revenue streams (MLB Network, cable...).  It'll also be interesting from an Apple perspective due to the tracking limitations and lower ad revenues for Apple.  MLB still has pricing power (monopoly for baseball talent), so the margins for the various revenue outlets will tighten.  Today's economy is weird in general anyway, and more so for entertainment.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

Las Vegas attracts over 40 million tourists a year (pre-pandemic).   Not all of them want to gamble 24 hours a day.  I’d bet their attendance would be very good.  Their hockey games sell out every night.   

I'm not an expert and I actively dislike the entire concept of Las Vegas existing, but how many people go all the way there to watch a baseball game that's probably between two teams they don't particularly care about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

as MLB is struggling to maintain what they currently have, expansion seams the worst route to take.

It wasnt that long ago, there was a contraction discussions and remove a team or two for the "good of the game'.

 

Contraction was just an owner's bargaining chip.  The economics or team performance had nothing to do with it. It was never serious. 

And as Corn says, somewhat lower attendance isn't that concerning to owners when they have more money flowing in from streaming and gambling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm not an expert and I actively dislike the entire concept of Las Vegas existing, but how many people go all the way there to watch a baseball game that's probably between two teams they don't particularly care about?

Clearly nobody goes there for the sole purpose of watching baseball.   Well, maybe one of those people who wants to visit every major league park would do that.  

But, let’s say you’re there for 4-7 days.   In that case it’s pretty easy to imagine you might take in a game, especially if you don’t live close to a city that has Major League Baseball.  
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Contraction was just an owner's bargaining chip.  The economics or team performance had nothing to do with it. It was never serious. 

And as Corn says, somewhat lower attendance isn't that concerning to owners when they have more money flowing in from streaming and gambling.

Im more concerned with the fan base growing old and not being replaced by the younger generation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

Clearly nobody goes there for the sole purpose of watching baseball.   Well, maybe one of those people who wants to visit every major league park would do that.  

But, let’s say you’re there for 4-7 days.   In that case it’s pretty easy to imagine you might take in a game, especially if you don’t live close to a city that has Major League Baseball.  
 

 

I agree with you, my fiancee had a convention/conference in Vegas and I had never been (never had a real desire) but I had some vacation to burn and went out and joined her for a couple of days. Ended up doing a bunch of stuff I wouldn't regularly do elsewhere (PBR Rodeo Finals, Cirque de Soleil, etc.), though that was also because the hotel comped tickets due to her job. And everything we went to was at full capacity. There are so many conventions and conferences and events in Vegas due to the hotels, and if you don't gamble/do the casino thing (like me), Vegas gets real boring real fast so I could certainly see a team there drawing a bunch of people who aren't hometown fans (or potentially even baseball fans).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

Clearly nobody goes there for the sole purpose of watching baseball.   Well, maybe one of those people who wants to visit every major league park would do that.  

But, let’s say you’re there for 4-7 days.   In that case it’s pretty easy to imagine you might take in a game, especially if you don’t live close to a city that has Major League Baseball.  
 

 

I mean, I guess.  But using that as a basis for turning Harrisburg into a thriving MLB franchise?  

The hockey team draws well, but this is the first year they didn't make the playoffs.  Lets see what support is like when they have five losing seasons in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Im more concerned with the fan base growing old and not being replaced by the younger generation.

Eventually we'll all be dead and the youngins will like what they like.  Maybe we think it's sad that it might not be baseball (not sure either way), but my great-great-great grandfather probably never saw an organized baseball game in his life and neither did most anyone before him.  It was fine. Life will go on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Eventually we'll all be dead and the youngins will like what they like.  Maybe we think it's sad that it might not be baseball (not sure either way), but my great-great-great grandfather probably never saw an organized baseball game in his life and neither did most anyone before him.  It was fine. Life will go on.

thats for putting the right perspective on it.

I guess I am sad, having lost my dad two months ago.

I remember him taking the time to let me play baseball rec sports, and we went to baseball games.

I did the same with my own girls and son.

Now, my grandkids have NO interest in baseball. Not something that I can push or change.

But, I will enjoy spending time with them, regardless of what we are doing.

Life is short.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

thats for putting the right perspective on it.

I guess I am sad, having lost my dad two months ago.

I remember him taking the time to let me play baseball rec sports, and we went to baseball games.

I did the same with my own girls and son.

Now, my grandkids have NO interest in baseball. Not something that I can push or change.

But, I will enjoy spending time with them, regardless of what we are doing.

Life is short.

 

Sorry to hear that.  Hopefully you can find some other common interests to share with the grandkids.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Sorry to hear that.  Hopefully you can find some other common interests to share with the grandkids.  

thanks. Yeah, we do, and they all have their phones and like to text and call, so that is way better, than waiting for the monthly phone call, as long distance costs wasnt something one was able to do ofton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2022 at 9:39 AM, btdart20 said:

I wonder if/how the Apple deal cannibalizes other revenue streams (MLB Network, cable...).  It'll also be interesting from an Apple perspective due to the tracking limitations and lower ad revenues for Apple.  MLB still has pricing power (monopoly for baseball talent), so the margins for the various revenue outlets will tighten.  Today's economy is weird in general anyway, and more so for entertainment.

The Apple deal also takes a bit of a bite out of the RSNs whose prime selling point is that they telecast nearly all their teams games.  Last night's Nats game was in Apple, not MASN.  The O's have a Friday night game in Boston in 4 weeks that will be on Apple, not MASN.

And Apple isn't the only streaming deal.  Peacock has one starting a week from tomorrow to air a game each Sunday in a semi-exclusive time slot.  The game will air at 11:30 or noon every Sunday through Labor Day weekend, and no other teams will be allowed to start games until 1:35 so at least the first 5 or 6 innings it will be the only game being played.  The O's are on the Peacock game on July 10 so if you're going to that game prepare for an early morning (it's at noon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • If I'm reading this correctly, the Orioles are 6th in defensive value this year and the White Sox are dead last by a lot: to date, they're at -54 runs; the worst team in baseball for all of '23 was -72 (https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/team_compare.cgi?request=1&year=2024&lg=MLB&stat=runs_fielding). So the difference between Burnes and Fedde must be the defensive adjustment. FWIW, fWAR using FIP has them even at 2.0 WAR apiece; using RA9 Burnes is ahead 2.9 to 2.4.
    • One game at a time. Let’s go O’s 👍🏻
    • You do realize our pen has given up fewer runs, fewer hits, fewer BBs, has a lower WHIP, and has more Ks?  I get that they don’t pass your eye test, but the numbers don’t back that up.  With all that said, I think they need to reinforce the pen but let’s stop with the dramatics.  
    • The OP is too pessimistic. NYY is 5-5 in their last 10, Orioles are 8-2. NYY have cooled down, as predicted. The O's are getting them at the right time. With that said, it's baseball. Anything can happen. I would be surprised if the Orioles don't take at least 2 out of 3, though.
    • Objectively speaking I would have WAY MORE confidence in Rodon than Irvin/Kremer/Suarez. And I LOVE what both Irvin and Suarez have done for us this season and couldn’t have dreamed of either giving us any more than they have.
    • Holliday is not getting traded IMO, so there’s really no point in discussing that. But there is a case to be made that the other two are a bit redundant and if we plan on doing some extensions, they could be expendable (at least one of them). Off the top of my head. I would strongly consider Miller or Crochet for one of them. I guess I look at it like this, I can see a realistic plausible scenario of us winning a championship or more without the services of Basallo or Mayo. However, I cannot see ya winning this season as is without a meaningful upgrade to the current pitching. Many said all last season, the pitching was good as is, until it (predictably) wasn’t.
    • Well for starters, there closer and set up man are both better than ours. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that the Yanks pen is better than the Phills by any stretch. But it is better than ours.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...