Jump to content

Is the pitching good?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

A look at some of the current MLB rankings for the Os:

  • K rate: 25th
  • BB rate: 14th
  • ERA: 17th
  • FIP: 21st
  • xFIP: 22nd
  • WAR: 8th
  • WPA: 12th
  • HR rate: 11th
  • Hard hit%: 13th
  • Barrel%: 16th
  • Exit velocity: 22nd
  • xwOBA: 29th
  • whiff%: 7th
  • weak contact%: 12th

Definitely a mixed bag here.  On one hand, the K rate sucks.  OTOH, the whiff% would indicate that the K rate should get better.  The BB rate has been very good and what we are getting from Tyler Wells is a big help there.  The HR rate will go up but can they keep other stats the same or get better?

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the lower K-rate is just a product of them throwing more strikes early in the count and/or the catchers setting up in the middle of the plate. I don't have a problem with inducing contact, and that checks out with the amount of double plays we're turning. Allowing more hits here and there, but inducing more contact for outs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

I wonder if the lower K-rate is just a product of them throwing more strikes early in the count and/or the catchers setting up in the middle of the plate. I don't have a problem with inducing contact, and that checks out with the amount of double plays we're turning. Allowing more hits here and there, but inducing more contact for outs. 

I like it more when they induce swings and misses.  A lot more risk in inducing contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d say the pitching hasn’t been awful.  That’s a big step up.  There are a few signs in your numbers that there could be tougher times ahead.  I pretty much expect that.  But when you look at how putrid our pitching has been the last several years, just being somewhat below average would be a huge improvement.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s impossible to measure the mental aspect from the ballpark fences being moved back. Are the pitchers more aggressive this year? 
 

I think they are overachieving but that said clearly better than last year. Grayson will at some point take over in the Watkins spot of the rotation. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I’d say the pitching hasn’t been awful.  That’s a big step up.  There are a few signs in your numbers that there could be tougher times ahead.  I pretty much expect that.  But when you look at how putrid our pitching has been the last several years, just being somewhat below average would be a huge improvement.   

Agreed.  I think many on the site are overrating the pitching.  Its funny, when you look at the Mateo thread, people are pointing that his offense is almost average because offense is down yet when they talk about pitching, all they talk about is how great they have been.  The consistency, or lack there of, is amusing.

That said, there are positive signs and while I don't think it will keep up, they should be improved and that doesn't take into account what is coming up..at least hopefully coming up, from the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I like it more when they induce swings and misses.  A lot more risk in inducing contact.

Sure. But you have to like the improvement from guys like Akin with this new approach. The lack of walk-related implosions has been nice. 

And I think the Ks are still there enough so that it isn't too imbalanced. Take Akin last night: 2.2 IP, 2 BB, 4 Ks. 9 Ks for the evening against a team that doesn't strikeout too much. 

I'd be more concerned if our pitchers were known as a bunch of iffy stuff guys. But we have strikeout-capable pitchers and guys with great stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year we were 2nd to last in K's but 8th in BB. I wonder if Elias has looked at our organization and decided we're just never going to be a big K/9 team and that is part of moving the wall out. Either way, I love, love, love the improvement in throwing strikes. I know it is more complicated but if teams value OBP with hitters they should value pitchers who throw strikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Last year we were 2nd to last in K's but 8th in BB. I wonder if Elias has looked at our organization and decided we're just never going to be a big K/9 team and that is part of moving the wall out. Either way, I love, love, love the improvement in throwing strikes. I know it is more complicated but if teams value OBP with hitters they should value pitchers who throw strikes. 

I truly hope he's not that stupid.  (and I don't think he is...getting Ks and missing bats is extremely important)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I truly hope he's not that stupid.

I think it's more likely he thought, "hopefully we develop/acquire strikeout pitchers, and also, let's move the wall back because that can't hurt". Obviously, he would like to have both things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the pitching good? No. Is it bad? Also no. Is that a huge step in the right direction? Yes.

I mostly like the bullpen (though the key is to avoid overworking them so they fall apart in the second half). Zimmermann and Bradish give me hope for future starters. Lyles will regress a bit as will Watkins (he's already up to a 5.19 ERA) and I still don't know what to think of Wells as a starter, but he's certainly a Major League pitcher in some regard. 

The pitching has been okay. It will regress without supplementing it. Thankfully we have Rodriguez and Hall on the way along with Vespi. Is that enough to stop a regression? Probably not, but at least the pitching is (and should remain) a significant step up from the disastrous pitching of last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I truly hope he's not that stupid.  (and I don't think he is...getting Ks and missing bats is extremely important)

Lol, I wasn't suggesting we never develop strikeout pitchers, just looking at the current level of pitching talent in the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Lol, I wasn't suggesting we never develop strikeout pitchers, just looking at the current level of pitching talent in the system.

You mean the level that says we have lots of high strike out guys headlined by Hall and GRod?

 You think he will make, literally, a ballpark altering decision because of a few MiL/ML pitchers we currently have, many of which will not be contributors when this team is a contender?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t feel picked on — I didn’t offer much detail regarding the changes I am hoping for. If my initial post didn’t sound like it, I do have more patience (at least a little more) than most. It may take more than a minute to get depth in the bullpen or an offense that can adjust in crunch time. I get that. I’m not in the torches and pitchforks crowd, but the O’s can’t sit on their hands either. That’s closer to where I’m at.  
    • I kept hoping, for the sake of my own enjoyment, that I'd eventually come around after having to look at it often enough, but, no, I still think it's ugly as sin. And I hate how it plays. 
    • Yeah, but after he was called back up and changed his pitch mix, in his last 8 starts he had a 9.4 SO/9. 
    • I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if he changed nothing in terms of strategy.  Look at what he traded recently right handed batters. I feel like it is more important to him to be innovative, and develop players that have been forgotten or have failed in the major leagues than it is to actually win a World Series. Obviously, that’s the end goal of all the things he’s doing, but he wants to do it in a way that looks innovative, and it looks like he knows more about the players that failed and how to fix them than any other person. I honestly believe that is why Hyde has been here so long. He does everything that he’s told and they don’t want to bring in a manager that won’t do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a lineup made up for him every day and I also wouldn’t be surprised if the whole game plan was planned out for him. What do you do when and where.. Obviously the numbers mean a lot in baseball and are extremely  helpful but they’re not everything. 
    • I'll celebrate whoever we get in a high echelon of MLB talent, but unfortunately unpacking this season too soon I think I don't even really want to win the Burnes bidding. Elias will value the next half season of information on Felix, Grayson and Bradish to figure out who goes with Eflin.     The growth he showed this year winning the Burnes and Eflin trade markets adds confidence he'll staff the top of the pitching roster appropriately in July 2025. If he is very risk averse with Kremer, Povich and Suarez, people would flip out but people like Kyle Gibson, Patrick Corbin and Jose Quintana hit me as safe innings he might actually pursue.
    • The team's valuation only matters at time of sale. The owner's wealth in an uncapped sport like MLB determines how much the team can spend. Steve Cohen by any metric available has tons more millions to SPEND than Hal Steinbrenner. Steve Cohen has even operated at a deficit over 100 million before which I believe was in 2023. And most importantly he has the WILL to get into the deepest of pools when it comes to FA as he has already shown in his short time owning the Mets.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...