Jump to content

Have We Reached Our High Water Mark?


WarehouseChatter

Recommended Posts

On 8/28/2022 at 11:21 AM, Can_of_corn said:

I would in no way feel let down by this team winning 85 games this season.

Let down by the team?   Of course not.  But at this point I’ll be disappointed if we win only 85 games, for a few days.   Then I’ll step back and be awed by it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

We have a better record than anyone in the AL Central now, which is nice.  It means even if one of Cle/Minn gets hot and passes us, it doesnt matter.  Both would have to pass us to beat us out for the wild card.

And in case you are wondering about our tiebreak vs Cleveland if Minnesota wins the Central and we tie Cleveland for the last wild card spot.   We went 3-3 against them this year.

The next tiebreak is your record in your own division.  Yes, even for wild card ties.  We are 27-29 vs the AL East, with 10 left with Toronto, 3 vs NYY, and 7 vs Boston.   Cleveland is 31-24 with 4 left with Chicago, 9 with KC, and 8 vs Minnesota.   So chances are, Cleveland would have the tiebreak with us.     Because  if we tie them, with our records being so close right now, it would mean we had a very similar record the rest of the way so it's likely we wouldn't make up 4 or 5 games in the 20/21 division games each of us has.

So in terms of tiebreaks, we lose out if tied with Seattle, Minnesota, Tampa, and probably Cleveland.   We probably win if tied with Toronto (because all we need to do is go 4-6 against them the rest of the way to win the season series, and if we fail to do that we probably ain't gonna wind up tied with them anyway).

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SteveA said:

The next tiebreak is your record in your own division.  Yes, even for wild card ties. 

Well that's dumb.  That's like a college football tiebreak where it's an SEC team's record in the SEC vs a Mid-America Conference team's record in the Mid-America Conference. It's a great plan if you're looking to get Akron a bowl...

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Well that's dumb.  That's like a college football tiebreak where it's an SEC team's record in the SEC vs a Mid-America Conference team's record in the Mid-America Conference. It's a great plan if you're looking to get Akron a bowl...

Have to have something and with the expanded playoffs they don’t want a game 163. That said you can’t control what division you play in. Would make more sense to me to use out of division AL games in this scenario. In division is fine if 2 teams from same division are tied, (of course with an odd number of games that’s not possible.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just need to hang around. Playing Captain Obvious here but just don’t get buried. Even if they only split the next two. At some point they will need to get hot and it’s likely at this point they need a team to fall back but I expected that anyway. 
 

You have a 6-2 stretch and a team you are chasing goes 3-5 you pick up 3 games in about a weeks time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Just need to hang around. Playing Captain Obvious here but just don’t get buried. Even if they only split the next two. At some point they will need to get hot and it’s likely at this point they need a team to fall back but I expected that anyway. 
 

You have a 6-2 stretch and a team you are chasing goes 3-5 you pick up 3 games in about a weeks time. 

Agree with this 100%.  The old expression "don't lose the same game twice" applies here, maybe doubly-so since it was a twin bill.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

It feels like we have after yesterday ☹️, at least in regards to our wild card race. Probably overreacted but we didn’t just get beat, we got whooped . Maybe I’m overreacting and hopefully we can get back on track.

We basically had to pitch a minor league starter and then had to rush a spot starter followed by another minor league starter.   The pitching has been good but they still lack depth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...