Jump to content

Banning the shift.........taking back baseball from the stat geeks and having a more entertaining game.


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

As I’ve said elsewhere, my feelings about this are mixed.  In principle, it bugs me that teams can’t strategically place their fielders wherever they want, and that one-dimensional hitters will benefit from this.   In practice, I’ll probably enjoy seeing games with more runners on base.   So, I’m taking a wait and see approach.  Ask me in a year what I think and I may love it or hate it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As I’ve said elsewhere, my feelings about this are mixed.  In principle, it bugs me that teams can’t strategically place their fielders wherever they want, and that one-dimensional hitters will benefit from this.   In practice, I’ll probably enjoy seeing games with more runners on base.   So, I’m taking a wait and see approach.  Ask me in a year what I think and I may love it or hate it.  

I think if we see averages jump a good amount you will love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

I am not so sure.  Next year will be very important to figuring out what is really going on with the tweny point drop in league averages.   

I think they banned sticky tack for pitchers in an attempt to slow spin rates and I guess lessen strikeouts.   How is that working out I dont actually know.   Are strikeout rates down at all this year?

And I dont think the athleticism of the defensive players is a huge part of the equation.  

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/home-runs-strikeouts-and-low-averages-are-trending-throughout-baseball/

That's just in the last 20 years.

I do think that the average fielder is more proficient at creating outs now than they were say back in the '80's.  Dunk on the DJ Stewarts of the world but he's still superior to the Larry Sheets of old.  Teams used to pin a glove onto the hand of a recently deceased hobo and stick them at third.  Not very many guys out there that are flat out liabilities on defense anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gurgi said:

Well at least I expect a league rise in batting averages next year.   At least ten points.....maybe fifteen.....twenty points would shock me but it would be welcomed my me.  

I lived my life expecting league average batting to be around .260-.264.   This year it is .245.  That is just horrible product for the consumer.  

So baseball is a horrible product this year, but if there were 1.5-2% more hits baseball wouldn't be boring?

We're talking about maybe one more hit per game here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

I think if we see averages jump a good amount you will love it.

Do you think the shift is causing a significant drop in batting averages?  Not many pure pull hitters out there.  Teams are still going to use analytics to position guys.

I think having Machado make a great play down the right field line is a lot more entertaining than watching a Chris Davis try and yank every pitch over the first base bag.

How is this not exciting baseball?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you think the shift is causing a significant drop in batting averages?  Not many pure pull hitters out there.  Teams are still going to use analytics to position guys.

I think having Machado make a great play down the right field line is a lot more entertaining than watching a Chris Davis try and yank every pitch over the first base bag.

How is this not exciting baseball?

 

The obvious answer is to tie every player's feet together with exactly 28 inches of rope.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never considered baseball to be boring, particularly if one understands and appreciates the nuances of the game.

Whether MLB changes the baseball year to year, or introduces rule changes (for whatever justification) is ultimately irrelevant to me as a fan.

The big question to me is:  What problem(s) (real or perceived) is MLB trying to solve by all of this tinkering?

Is it to reduce player injuries?

Is it control of player compensation? (IE: Using a live or dead ball for a given season affecting ERA or BA.)

Is it improving in person attendance at games?

Is it increasing TV revenue or advertising revenue?

I'm not clear what problems all of the recent tinkering is trying to fix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lurker said:

I've never considered baseball to be boring, particularly if one understands and appreciates the nuances of the game.

Whether MLB changes the baseball year to year, or introduces rule changes (for whatever justification) is ultimately irrelevant to me as a fan.

The big question to me is:  What problem(s) (real or perceived) is MLB trying to solve by all of this tinkering?

Is it to reduce player injuries?

Is it control of player compensation? (IE: Using a live or dead ball for a given season affecting ERA or BA.)

Is it improving in person attendance at games?

Is it increasing TV revenue or advertising revenue?

I'm not clear what problems all of the recent tinkering is trying to fix?

I am 100% in favor of the pitch clock.

That is dead time getting removed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I am 100% in favor of the pitch clock.

That is dead time getting removed.

 

I've no problem with that.

However, I'm still not certain what problem (potentially) shaving 15 or 20 minutes off a game is going to solve? More people in the park? More eyeballs on the TV? More opportunities to run commercials?

What problem is this solving for MLB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The minors 50 point OBP gap basically gone so far.   I do think Cowser (especially early Cowser) and Westburg present a contrast in the "trying to get a walk" bearing in the batter's box.     I believe some guys can leverage that skill to get counterfeit minors OBP numbers. Cowser's not that one dimensional, for sure, as Zack Wheeler experienced yesterday.       I don't concede RoY to Luis Gil just yet, though the Orioles hopes there would be helped if they can hit him some this week.    Cowser in a better spot than Gil to sustain production the last 5/9ths of the season. fWAR for now has it at: AL Bats - Cowser 2.1, W. Abreu 1.6 AL Arms - Gil 2.0, Miller 1.3
    • Bobby Witt, Jr. Contract I'll believe Gunnar signs when he signs and I don't think he signs with the O's before hitting FA first. What SG says makes a lot of sense, but Gunnar is going to bet on himself and hit FA.
    • The issue is all indications are the WS are delusional with his value just like Cease. 
    • I’m a massive Westburg fan, but when it’s all said and done I believe Cowser will be the better hitter. 
    • Gunnar has 5.0 WAR in 70 games.  He is on pace for 50 HR, 112 RBI, 21 SB and an OPS over 950.  I tired of the extension talk.  I believe they will get something done but would rather just enjoy watching him play.  I was crushed when Chris Davis got Manny's money and he walked the next year because I wanted to see a talent like that for their whole career on the Orioles.  I think Gunnar is as talented maybe even more than Manny and is a way better sportsman and teammate from all reports.  He demeanor remind me so much of Cal and his talent is otherworldly.  I like to browse Baseball Reference from time to time and one thing I always find interesting is to look at their Similarity Scores for players through their current age.  In the top ten for Gunnar there are three Hall of Famers - Tony Lazzeri, Gary Carter and Scott Rolen.  Others in there are Eric Chavez, Travis Fryman and Bobby Witt, JR.  We all know how good Gunnar is but sometimes we undervalue the fact that he has a chance to be the best player in baseball for the next ten years.  I get all the talk about the business of baseball because it matters in building a winner but the joy of being a fan for me is watching players like Ripken, Murray, Jones, Manny, Adley and Gunnar; probably my favorite Orioles ever.
    • That tracks with the eye test.  He’s been pounding balls all year and has had terrible luck.  He’s going to be good for a long time.  
    • I'm curious to see if Mike Elias gets himself a seat there like last year.     The place will probably be a bit more packed this year.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...