Jump to content

FA starting pitchers remaining as of 12/7


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why have the Mets let Bassitt go so far?  I worry we’d have to go to 4 years to sign him and lose a draft pick. 

We definitely aren't signing Bassitt and I would be pretty surprised if we give anyone more than 2 years. Manaea or Kluber on a 1 year+team option deal is the most realistic outcome if we choose to add another starter through free agency instead of trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I would worry about SF re-signing Rodon at this point now that they missed out on Judge. They could bring in both Rodon and Correa (~$55-60?) for not all that much more than Judge alone (~$45). 

They could be in on Senga. But yeah, I'd say SF and LAD are sure to nab at least one tier 1 FA each. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tabletop said:

Maybe there are stuff in the statcast data that are red flags that I didn't see but to me a guy that had a 2.93era last year with a 2.99 FIP over 165 innings only getting 2/26 seems like exactly the type of pitcher the O's should have been overpaying on a 2 year deal to get. I'm not sure how they can think Gibson at 10 mil is a good deal but Quintana isn't.

The Baltimore price is probably 2/30 although I am inclined to agree. I am guessing it's the years more than the AAV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting pretty close to Rodon or bust. We don't need more mid-rotation guys. We have Kremer, Bradish, and Wells (plus Gibson). With young guys like GrayRod and Hall coming up and Means eventually coming back. All of those young pitchers will be cheap for the next 3-4 years. Invest in the front-end of the rotation.

*And if we don't sign Rodon, I'd rather trade for a Burnes, Woodruff, Lopez, etc. than drop $15M/year+ on a #3.

**Bassitt could have solid value. I'm just wary of giving 3/4 years to a guy in his mid-30's. He has been excellent over the past 4 years. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Not a bad contract. The Orioles should have the opportunity to get one of these guys at a reasonable rate.

Maybe Cueto on a two-year deal.  If Walker gets 4/72 then  you have to believe Bassitt gets at least 4 years and for more total dollars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Elias is winning vs. the field at $$$/WAR with Gibson for 10 and Quintana for 26.

But I don't care that much about $$$/WAR.    Its your 2nd of 6 Adley seasons.

It felt odd when he published it that way, but with the creative structuring ESPN Kiley McDaniel's organizing his Top 50 FA predictions piece by guaranteed dollars instead of AAV is making more sense by the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I think Elias is winning vs. the field at $$$/WAR with Gibson for 10 and Quintana for 26.

But I don't care that much about $$$/WAR.    Its your 2nd of 6 Adley seasons.

It felt odd when he published it that way, but with the creative structuring ESPN Kiley McDaniel's organizing his Top 50 FA predictions piece by guaranteed dollars instead of AAV is making more sense by the day.

Market falling back some? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, interloper said:

I would worry about SF re-signing Rodon at this point now that they missed out on Judge. They could bring in both Rodon and Correa (~$55-60?) for not all that much more than Judge alone (~$45). 

I agree. But we could do the same and acquire both and not only control our payroll to be reasonable for this year but for the next few years, especially if Correa would take a contract of 7 years or less.

Those 2 players (Alone) combined with what we already have would give us the additional wins necessary to realistically put ourselves in position to compete next year and going forward into the immediate future.

Yes, they come with risks, but in '22 baseball just about all good free agents have a risk required to take on in order to get them to sign a contract. For those advocating acquiring our biggest pieces through trade, those guys will have to be paid too.

The odds of the O's having a team that is good enough to challenge for a pennant are extremely long if we are not planning to spend to acquire/retain good players. At best (and I mean if everything breaks right and we get very lucky) our ceiling would be Tampa Bay. Which is good enough to be in the conversation but not talented enough to take us over the top. The odds of being able to duplicate that model are not that high in my opinion. Plus, if we do take on that approach I'm very concerned that we will have their consequence that comes from that which is no fans and no relevancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m fine with riding with this,

GR, Bradish, Kremer, Gibson, Voth

Depth: Wells, Means, Hall, Watkins

I think we need a vet bat that can work the count. Brantley seems to fit. 

Our team as is with the addition of Brantley helps us to leapfrog which playoff team from last year? Or are you good with a winning record (somewhere in the 82-86 range) being the bar for next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

This is why 2023 simply cannot be another punt year.

By this time next year, we will only have 4 years of the Adley/Gunnar/GrayRod trio remaining. 

Right.  And arguably, the payroll will never be lower.  Choose your free agents wisely, but this should not just be a punt year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m fine with riding with this,

GR, Bradish, Kremer, Gibson, Voth

Depth: Wells, Means, Hall, Watkins

I think we need a vet bat that can work the count. Brantley seems to fit. 

Conforto another. Better career BB rate and OPS+ than Brantley, and younger. Big question is health. O's doctors are known to do strict physicals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Will he get 1 PA in the ALWC series? To put flesh on the bones, say against Lucas Erceg on for a Save at James McCann's spot in the lineup. He is behind all of O'Hearn, Mountcastle and Kjerstad probably on the depth chart, but if you get Ragans out by the 5th or 6th they could all be used before the endgame.
    • The race is close enough that the run environment should be a factor. In the steroid era or bouncy ball 2019, 15 W/3.50 ERA might be a much better performance than a .242 AVG/24 HR/good defense. Which is more impressive in light-hitting 2024? The whole league hit .243 this year, tied with 2022 as the lowest since... 1968.  I'd probably vote for Gil but I kinda feel like Cowser will win it in a close race. And I'm not sure NY bias is a thing in awards voting anymore with the more online media landscape and more stat-educated voters. When's the last time a NY player won an end of season award they didn't deserve? 
    • Chris Sale wasn't signed, he was acquired in a trade.
    • All of what you posted is why you have to take both dWAR and fWAR with a grain of salt when it comes to valuing defense.  OAA strictly gives you how good a player is at his position vs other players at his position. There is no guessing involved. Now could OAA receive some tweaking, especially with infielders, I think so. I don't think OAA is perfect by any means, but let's say Santana did save his team 12 runs and let's say a SS was at 0 runs saved. Why should he be penalized for playing a less stressful position? In the end he did save runs vs a SS that didn't save or lose runs. I guess in the end you look at all the defensive metrics (OAA, dWAR, DRS) and then make your opinion based off them. I also use my scouting eye and watching most of the games, I'd say Cowser is an above average defensive outfielder with plus arm strength and way below average accuracy.
    • Burnes and Eflin were fantastic keeping the team moving forward in a year Felix, Bradish and Grayson were mostly gone. It is fuzzy for me if you combine Elias' team's results in the cases of Albert Suarez and Trevor Rogers if that's a good job or a bad job. Some talk about people like Pivetta, but I don't see a ton of April/May/June demand.     Eflin, Grayson, Kremer, Povich and Suarez leave Rogers, McDermott and Young 6/7/8 already.    Are those guys ever going to pitch? Povich and Suarez showed enough in September it seems worth it to see April. We rarely see a decision Elias doesn't like to defer, and the first half of 2025 will give information how the roster needs to be managed.    How strong is Felix?    What setbacks do Bradish and Wells have?    Can Grayson hold up more than 2 straight months? Elias is building a body of work he'll win the bids for Corbin Burnes and Zach Eflin when necessary, but I don't think this winter is one of those times.
    • OAA and dWAR are two measure that people use to determine if a player is a good defensive player or not. They absolutely can be mentioned when talking defense. They both measure the defensive ability of a player, though they do it differently. Acting like it some kind of horror to mention them together is one of the more ridiculous stances I've ever seen you take here.  NOBODY said they measure the exact same thing and the EXACT same way, but they absolutely are two measures people use to determine if a player is good defensively.  OAA shows Cowser to be a well above average defensive outfielder while dWAR shows Cowser to be more average. I think OAA in this case absolutely is a better indicator of Cowser's defensive ability. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...