Jump to content

Is McKenna's spot in jeopardy?


interloper

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, seak05 said:

Mateo vs LHP last season .203/.253/.365/.618

McKenna vs LHP last season .270/.333/.460/.794

This is why it doesn't really make sense to play Mateo anywhere other then short stop. Literally anyone else is a better bat, so he's only in the lineup for his defense

Not true. If Mullins continues to struggle against LHP like he did last season, then later on this season it makes sense to potentially play Mateo in CF, Ortiz/Gunnar/Urias/Westburg at SS, Urias/Westburg/Ortiz/Gunnar at 2B, Gunnar/Urias/Westburg/Ortiz at 3B. Norby may also come into play late in the season at 2B.

Either way, I want Mateo to be traded away so that Westburg and Ortiz can be playing regularly as soon as possible. Mateo playing CF not only gives the Orioles more options, but it helps boost Mateo's trade value.

Edited by Brooks The Great
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Not true. If Mullins continues to struggle against LHP like he did last season, then later on this season it makes sense to potentially play Mateo in CF, Ortiz/Gunnar/Urias/Westburg at SS, Urias/Westburg/Ortiz/Gunnar at 2B, Gunnar/Urias/Westburg/Ortiz at 3B. Norby may also come into play late in the season at 2B.

Either way, I want Mateo to be traded away so that Westburg and Ortiz can be playing regularly as soon as possible. Mateo playing CF not only gives the Orioles more options, but it helps boost Mateo's trade value.

But why wouldn’t you just play McKenna in that scenario? Who hits lefties much better.
 

Matteo btw barely hit lefties better than Mullins last year. 
 

When/if Ortiz comes up there is no real reason for Mateo to be on the roster. Same with Westburg if the orioles think he can be a backup SS (in addition to playing regularly at 2b/3b)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shrug: Mateo as the backup CF makes sense if you're trying to free up a roster spot, and plan on playing Mullins basically every game. If you're actually worried about Mullins against LH/planning to rest him 1-2x per week then McKenna is the better option. 

I would guess that Vavra then becomes the backup corner OF/defensive replacement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they know that Mateo is not a starter at any position.  In the long term they may see him as a utility man that can provide plus defense at multiple positions late in games and pinch run.  If so, giving him reps in the OF now makes tons of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I think they know that Mateo is not a starter at any position.  In the long term they may see him as a utility man that can provide plus defense at multiple positions late in games and pinch run.  If so, giving him reps in the OF now makes tons of sense.

I think you’re over thinking it.  If that were the case, why wait until the last week of ST to have him play any other position besides SS?    He hasn’t played 2B, 3B, or any other OF positions.  That’s not the way you get a utility guy ready for the season.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think just as good a question and maybe a better question is this.  "Is Kyle Stowers spot in jeopardy?

 

With the 4 man infield rotation and Rutschman needing DH AB's, that DH/4th oufielder role won't be huge.   Also, if McKenna and Vavra both make the team, that's 2 extra outfielders there as well.    The Orioles may opt for someone who can play 1B like O'Hearn, Cordero, or Lester over Stowers.    I am getting the feeling that Stowers is not going to make the 26-man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think just as good a question and maybe a better question is this.  "Is Kyle Stowers spot in jeopardy?

 

With the 4 man infield rotation and Rutschman needing DH AB's, that DH/4th oufielder role won't be huge.   Also, if McKenna and Vavra both make the team, that's 2 extra outfielders there as well.    The Orioles may opt for someone who can play 1B like O'Hearn, Cordero, or Lester over Stowers.    I am getting the feeling that Stowers is not going to make the 26-man roster.

I would not put it past Elias to do that honestly. I personally think they would be silly to send Stowers out and keep O'Hearn, but this an organization that signed and played a washed up Aguilar over him last year so who knows? Elias signed Frazier and acquired O'Hearn despite his $1.4 million salary. He must have some plan for them and you do have to wonder if it will be at the expense of Stowers. 

I will be majorly disappointed if Stowers is sent back and or not played pretty much everyday at the big league level. He "only" put up a .884 OPS last year in AAA and plays this year at 25. It's time to find out whether he translates successfully to the big leagues.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...