Jump to content

Opening Day 1983


fansince1988

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

GTFO you could get a cigar at the concessions stand? 
 

I’m sure it was something terrible like a White Owl but still.  I was born way too late. 

I'm surprised the O's don't have a "smoking" lounge for a different type of cigar.  You've got to attract all demographics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, seeing that bar/lounge restaurant triggered a childhood memory. The very 1st game I ever went to was with my grandparents at Memorial Park (and it was the only game I've ever been to there), and before the game they took me to eat at that restaurant. My memory is very limited about that restaurant, and I could only remember it being a dark place with nice tables in the stadium. This video is very nice to see because it adds perspective to that faded memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beer as high as $3.30. Now they have the first or second highest beer prices. Lowest price is around $10.99.

Beer prices at the B & O matket:

16oz beers are $10.99 for domestic and $12.49 for craft, hard, seltzers, or imported beers. 24oz beers are $14.99 for domestic and $15.75 for imports or hard seltzers. 12oz canned cocktails are $12.99.

Edited by Going Underground
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great video clip. Brought back many memories. Saw first pro baseball game at Memorial Stadium in 1953. Little League baseball team went to see the International League Baltimore Orioles (Phillies AAA affiliate). Took all of my sons to see a game at "the stadium". One now a life long O's fan and another a "water cooler fan".  Future father-in-law helped build the upper deck extension. A lot of Baltimore sports history rapped up in that palace. Both Orioles and Colts. Aah, 1983, the year Home Team Sports (HTS) brought every Orioles game to TV in distant lands, like historic Southern Maryland. Last WS champion.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

The 1980's had many of the same issues we have now. We always look back and say they were better times 

I didn’t mean it in any broad, societal kind of way.  Just looking at how people were dressed for opening day, the very affordable prices, the unbridled (and totally justified) optimism of the fans.  Baseball held a very special place in the fabric of Baltimore back in those days that I do not think they hold now in the same way.  Part of that is the decline in popularity of the sport in general; the bigger part is the difference between 19 winning seasons out of 20 (1963-1982) going into that year, vs. 6 winning seasons out of the last 25 now.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I didn’t mean it in any broad, societal kind of way.  Just looking at how people were dressed for opening day, the very affordable prices, the unbridled (and totally justified) optimism of the fans.  Baseball held a very special place in the fabric of Baltimore back in those days that I do not think they hold now in the same way.  Part of that is the decline in popularity of the sport in general; the bigger part is the difference between 19 winning seasons out of 20 (1963-1982) going into that year, vs. 6 winning seasons out of the last 25 now.  

Just keep in mind we've had 202% inflation since '83.

BTW the 1983 O's drew 2,042,071 (with a capacity over 50K).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Just keep in mind we've had 202% inflation since '83.

BTW the 1983 O's drew 2,042,071 (with a capacity over 50K).

Their greatest teams (1969-71) could barely draw 1 million fans.  The teams beginning in 1977 really captured the fans’ imagination because the free agency period had begun and the team competed so well against the Yankees and Red Sox despite the obvious economic disadvantages.  Those were seen as really blue collar teams that fit Baltimore’s self-image to a T.  Of course, it didn’t hurt that Washington had lost its team after ‘71 and Tom Boswell began covering the O’s in the Post on a daily basis and helped convert a lot of DC-area fans into Orioles fans with his eloquent coverage of the team.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Their greatest teams (1969-71) could barely draw 1 million fans.  The teams beginning in 1977 really captured the fans’ imagination because the free agency period had begun and the team competed so well against the Yankees and Red Sox despite the obvious economic disadvantages.  Those were seen as really blue collar teams that fit Baltimore’s self-image to a T.  Of course, it didn’t hurt that Washington had lost its team after ‘71 and Tom Boswell began covering the O’s in the Post on a daily basis and helped convert a lot of DC-area fans into Orioles fans with his eloquent coverage of the team.  

Yep.  I'm just saying the special place in the fabric stuff is a bit rose tinted with history.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Maybe John Means could masquerade as a healthy Chayce McDermott. https://www.milb.com/player/chayce-mcdermott-694646
    • I’m not sure trading for an impact starter is best use of resources. We still have six starters at the MLB level in Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Irvin, Kremer, and Suarez. Then Povich looks like he deserves a shot if needed.    Burnes, Bradish, GRod are the obvious playoff trio.    further injuries would change things, obviously, but at the moment I don’t see a clear need (and would have to pay handsomely for an upgrade). If someone would want Kremer as a part of the package, then maybe it makes sense. 
    • When Kremer comes back you have Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Kremer, Irvin Suarez in the bullpen.  Povich and McDermott at Norfolk. Absent further injury I don’t see Elias doing what it would probably take for Luzardo.  The relievers like Scott, Harvey, etc. will be cheaper.        
    • The basic story Elias told about Corbin Burnes is that Orioles strategic interest was communicated early in the offseason, and Matt Arnold took a long time (beyond even Milwaukee's successful recruitment of Rhys Hoskins) to decide which path to take. Indefinitely, Mike Elias' basic job is to know the availability and acquisition cost of any of the world's best pitchers, especially relievers as it would be awfully tough to unseat the top 3 starters that are really all the tournament asks of a pitching staff from that role. I don't think we will see the big move until near the deadline because the GM's of some teams playing .501 baseball also want all the mid-July information they can get, and they generally have better relievers than the .375 clubs. Jesus Luzardo would answer a 2025 question but quickly create a 2024 one if him or Grayson Rodriguez is going into the bullpen, a tricky ask Elias might prefer to veer away from. If Suarez/Kremer are really wobbly, the Joe Saunders-Erick Fedde kind of guy would be uncertain for the tournament roster.
    • Not specific to sliders, but if you toggle between 2023 and 2024, you can see his chase rate and whiff rate are significantly improved  https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jorge-mateo-622761?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb
    • I updated my post above after realizing I missed their trade suggestion: Bradfield, Povich, and Norby.  I think their proposal is too short on our end.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...