Jump to content

Eve Rosenbaum interview


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Nice interview here with Eve Rosenbaum, about 30 minutes long.  She got into topics like:

- How is the lineup set each night.

- How does the team decide when a prospect is ready for a call-up.

- How does the team decide when to send a player down (discussing Stowers specifically).

- Is the team considering long term extensions for any players.  

Obviously she’s not giving away any state secrets, but she answered in more detail than we typically get from the O’s front office.  

 https://apple.co/3UuJ0mt Spotify:

https://spoti.fi/3zSLemf


 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im listening to it now, she's a pretty good interview. I like how the daily lineups are thought out by the wizards (advance scouting department) and the magicians (analytics) then Hyde makes the final decision. I wasnt sure it was his call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

I listened this morning.  One of my key takeaways from when she was discussing Stowers was that they aren't comfortable playing him in left field in Camden Yards.  She didn't explicitly say this, but that was clearly the implication.

I didn't put that together as I was listening while working (multitasking = doing 2 things badly), but that's a good call out.    I remembered more the part where she described new Camden as having "two centerfields".

I was also hit by the contrast between the gospel of mastering every element of every level and the Jorge Mateo action of, "Eh, let's just make him the everyday SS at the MLB level".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Eve biggest comment was that the prospects have to be better than who they are competing with.   (In Elias/Hyde's mind)   So far they don't think Stowers is better than Santander.  And he is only competing in RF and DH.

And if we look at the DH pecking order it begins with Adley, then Mountcastle, then Gunnar,   Maybe even Hays, Urias and Frazier the way they is hitting.    They seem to want to see Vavra over Stowers.

Apparently the O's braintrust does not think Stowers has shown enough at AAA to where he is better than the guys he is competing with.  It not that he has not earned a promotion.   Its who he is competing against.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jabba72 said:

Im listening to it now, she's a pretty good interview. I like how the daily lineups are thought out by the wizards (advance scouting department) and the magicians (analytics) then Hyde makes the final decision. I wasnt sure it was his call.

It may be "his call" on the final lineup. But Hyde is not rocking the boat and going against the "advanced scouting" and "wizards" unless someone is injured. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I thought Eve biggest comment was that the prospects have to be better than who they are competing with.   (In Elias/Hyde's mind)   So far they don't think Stowers is better than Santander.  And he is only competing in RF and DH.

And if we look at the DH pecking order it begins with Adley, then Mountcastle, then Gunnar,   Maybe even Hays, Urias and Frazier the way they is hitting.    They seem to want to see Vavra over Stowers.

Apparently the O's braintrust does not think Stowers has shown enough at AAA to where he is better than the guys he is competing with.  It not that he has not earned a promotion.   Its who he is competing against.

Yeah, no way he could do better than .544 OPS. lol

There was plenty of PAs available for him without taking someone's job. Did she say why they never gave him any PAs against left-handed pitching after hitting them hard his whole career? What wizardry decides he should never get PAs against lefties but Henderson should?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

Wonder if that’s a function of him being a freak athlete + not being “one of theirs”.  

She clearly stated Mateo had success in AAA and was blocked by playing on a good team in San Diego. The O's apparently were waiting to pounce on him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

She clearly stated Mateo had success in AAA and was blocked by playing on a good team in San Diego. The O's apparently were waiting to pounce on him.

Correct.  Was listening while working first time through.  Missed that.  Just listened again.  Thanks for pointing that out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Im listening to it now, she's a pretty good interview. I like how the daily lineups are thought out by the wizards (advance scouting department) and the magicians (analytics) then Hyde makes the final decision. I wasnt sure it was his call.

I've often wondered how Analytics can account for the success of small ball tactics (which actually win games.) Sometimes a Manager just has a good feel for the game in certain situations and I'm skeptical that numbers can actually reflect the positive affects of things like a bunt to move runners along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
    • McDermott has a WHIP of almost 1.5 and has walked 41 batters in 64 and 2/3 innings. I'm not sure how that plays at the Big League level or how anyone could have a lot of confidence that those numbers translate into the kind of shut down backend reliever that we need.
    • I would be not surprised at all if McDermott deloads after the all star break and comes up to use as a reliever a la do hall the last few years. He’s basically tanner Scott without having to give up prospects to get. 
    • I don't want anything for Grayson. We are trying to win and add, not subtract from areas of strength. We can add a a 2/3ish starter for less than Holliday and Kjerstad. We have plenty of players/prospects that we can trade that other teams want. After all, we have the best farm system in the game. Just because the player(s) is/are not the #1 prospect in the sport, it doesn't make him/them spare parts.
    • I'm surprised the O's haven't tried McDermott as a reliever yet.  Some posters have said the O's need 3 relievers.  There is no way the O's are trading for 3 relievers.  They might trade for 1, find one in the minors and claim one off the waiver wire. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...