Jump to content

Cade Povich 2023


Getz

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Some interesting numbers:

 

:D The Hoodie!  Channeling his inner Belichick/Beelzebub!  

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Now he just needs to show some consistency.  

Completely this!  The upside for a TOR certainly flashes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think TOR is a reasonable thing to dream on.

Not with a 1.352 WHIP and 4BB/9 as a 23 year old in AA.

Yea, the walks are the issue here. Even if some of the rate stats really like him, you can’t have that many walks, especially at his age.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think TOR is a reasonable thing to dream on.

Not with a 1.352 WHIP and 4BB/9 as a 23 year old in AA.

That's fair/reasonable.  But there's no doubt in my mind that he flashes TOR upside.  

13.67 K9 - 4.0 BB9 = 9.67 K9-BB9.  That's better than some TORs in today's game.  23 y/o isn't unusually old for AA, especially for pitchers.

McClanahan (LHP) had a 7.36 K9-BB9 with a 4.12 FIP and 2.91 xFIP in AA (age 22).  1.96 WHIP.

Burnes has a 6.72 K9-BB9 with a 2.23 FIP and a 2.76 xFIP in AA (age 22).  1.00 WHIP.

Rodon (LHP) never was in AA.  But his career MiLB BB9 was greater that 4.  1.37 WHIP.

Not saying he'll be McClanahan, Burnes, or Rodon by any stretch, just providing a known benchmark.  Stat-wise, he's not far off of those guys except for consistency.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, interloper said:

I love me some Povich, and this outing was great to see.

However, Zimmermann also just pitched a complete game shutout for Norfolk. 

We need to see Povich repeat a few outings like this. 

I think Povich has a lot of upside.  When he’s on his game, he dominates and misses a ton of bats.  It’s just that when he doesn’t dominate, he struggles.  There’s no real in between.  And, he dominates half the time at most.   So, it’s about consistency and doing a better job of managing games where he’s not firing on all cylinders. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/16/2023 at 10:25 AM, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think TOR is a reasonable thing to dream on.

Not with a 1.352 WHIP and 4BB/9 as a 23 year old in AA.

Randy Johnson went 1.39 5.72/9 as a 25 yo in AAA.  Trimmed it to 1.22 4.5/9 as a 26 yo before his MLB promotion.  
 

Not suggesting likely but by no means outside the realm of possibility.  How likely is it to get a true ace regardless?  
 

Johnson’s best MiLB k/9 rate was 8.8k/9. 

Edited by emmett16
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Randy Johnson went 1.39 5.72/9 as a 25 yo in AAA.  Trimmed it to 1.22 4.5/9 as a 26 yo before his MLB promotion.  
 

Not suggesting likely but by no means outside the realm of possibility.  How likely is it to get a true ace regardless?  
 

Johnsksn best MiLB k/9 rate was 8.8k/9. 

Because Tom House is the GOAT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Randy Johnson went 1.39 5.72/9 as a 25 yo in AAA.  Trimmed it to 1.22 4.5/9 as a 26 yo before his MLB promotion.  
 

Not suggesting likely but by no means outside the realm of possibility.  How likely is it to get a true ace regardless?  
 

Johnsksn best MiLB k/9 rate was 8.8k/9. 

First off a quick peek shows that Johnson had a K rate at or over 10 in both 86 and 87.

Secondly I question comparing minor league K rates between now and 35 years ago.

Did I say anything was outside the real of possibility?

I said it isn't a reasonable thing to dream on.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2023 at 10:24 PM, connja said:

7ip, 1 hit, 0 bb's, 13k's 0ER

Wowza.

These are the kinds of nights that gives us a glimpse of his potential. When he's throwing strikes, he's absolutely dominant. He just needs to work on consistency like most young pitchers. The upside is very high on Povich but his floor is a dominant left-handed reliever, but unlike Hall, I believe he has a legitimate chance of sticking as a starter. 

The more his lower half fills out the longer he will be able to go more consistently. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off a quick peek shows that Johnson had a K rate at or over 10 in both 86 and 87.

Secondly I question comparing minor league K rates between now and 35 years ago.

Did I say anything was outside the real of possibility?

I said it isn't a reasonable thing to dream on.

I think a lot of this is word play and definitions.

At the end of the day, Povich has TOR stuff when he's on and there's a real possibility his velocity will continue to gain as his lower half fills out. But, his inconsistencies have held him back a bit and until he can figure out a way to limit them, he's got more likelihood of a mid-rotation starter. But he still has hoops to get through to get there as well. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I think a lot of this is word play and definitions.

At the end of the day, Povich has TOR stuff when he's on and there's a real possibility his velocity will continue to gain as his lower half fills out. But, his inconsistencies have held him back a bit and until he can figure out a way to limit them, he's got more likelihood of a mid-rotation starter. But he still has hoops to get through to get there as well. 

He’s one of the more inconsistent pitching prospects we have.  He’s literally never had two really good starts in a row at Bowie, though his recent streak of three bad games in a row was really the first time he had more than one bad outing consecutively.  I’ll certainly be watching to see how he does this week following last week’s gem.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This doesn’t detract from your main point, but fielders don’t get up to full speed for the first 3 seconds.  On average, Santander covers 32.2 feet in the first 3 seconds, Rodriguez 36.6, per Statcast jump data.  So, the difference on a 4 second hang time ball is more like 7-8 feet rather than 10-12.  
    • I think a team like the Orioles don't really have the luxury of extending a pretty good 30-year-old outfielder. Always take bb-ref comps with a grain of salt, but Santander's top comps through age 28 include: Jay Gibbons (less than 200 PAs after 30) Mark Trumbo (below replacement from 31-on) Carlos Quentin (below replacement from 31-on) Deron Johnson (1.6 WAR in 3198 PAs from 31-on) Willie Kirkland (productive career over at 28) Bo Jackson (yes, injuries, but done at 31) Nick Esasky (last good year at 29) Josh Reddick (OPS'd .711 with 2 WAR from 31-on) Also Paul O'Neill and Jay Buhner. So 8/10 would have been terrible choices to extend at 30.
    • The Statcast data does help highlight the silliness of errors. Or some of them. Rodriguez has a top sprint speed of over 29 feet/second, while Anthony Santander is at 26. On a 4-second hang time ball Rodriguez will be able to cover roughly 10-12 additional feet. So if a ball goes off his glove at the end he likely gets an error, while on the very same ball Santander gets credit for chasing a double or a triple up the gap. And then back to our discussion yesterday about ERA in another thread, whomever was on the mound is absolved from the Rodriguez error, while they take full blame for Santander allowing the extra-base hit.
    • Only an elite athlete can turn a single into a double 
    • Thank God. Who wants a manager who gets an itch on his is nose or some advice from a fortune cookie and uses that to make decisions instead of real, hard information?
    • In his career Crawford hits righties better to the tune 70 points of OPS (737 to 667). That's the better metric to use than extremely noisy one-year splits. Crawford is not a reverse-platoon hitter, those essentially don't exist. He's a normal hitter with SSS data this year.
    • They have a couple 30 something nonclosers in Cleavinger and Kelly. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...