Jump to content

What do you think Mateo’s final 2023 OPS will be?


Frobby

What do you think Mateo’s final 2023 OPS will be?  

94 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think Mateo’s final 2023 OPS will be?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/02/23 at 23:13

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

@Sports Guy with the sub .700 OPS vote. If my math is correct, Mateo would have to OPS 627 over the next 5 months to average sub 700.  Not impossible for sure.  But it would be a dramatic drop from April. 

Yes, that’s going to require him posting an OPS about 60 points below his career average while still getting significant plate appearances.  My guess is that if he falls off that hard he’ll lose playing time.  It could be tough to get that low given his April statistics.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with 800-849.

As the math has already been done that's pretty easy: He needs a 750 OPS the rest of the way.

That's my new base expectation for him.  As someone else noted: This is similar to Mullins' breakout in 21.  Yeah, he's not 1000 OPS guy, but he's a markedly improved hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jagwar said:

@Sports Guy with the sub .700 OPS vote. If my math is correct, Mateo would have to OPS 627 over the next 5 months to average sub 700.  Not impossible for sure.  But it would be a dramatic drop from April. 

He’s gotta double down.    Just another Oriole player making him look dumb.   One thing statistics and percentages can’t predict.  Players making adjustments and changes and getting better.    Some do.  Some don’t.  Mateo got stronger and made the changes.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Mateo's improvement is real, and I was in favor of trading him in the offseason.  I don't think he will keep hitting like he has because that would be peak ARod.  The improvement in plate discipline and power look real.  I picked .800-.849.  That looks realistic if he improves his OBP over 300 and hits for some power.  If I had to guess, his slash line will be close to .270/.320/.500.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jagwar said:

@Sports Guy with the sub .700 OPS vote. If my math is correct, Mateo would have to OPS 627 over the next 5 months to average sub 700.  Not impossible for sure.  But it would be a dramatic drop from April. 

The options given don’t give me the range I feel he falls in. I would have him in the 675-725 range.  
 

He had a similar stretch to this, albeit not quite as good, last year for about a month and he still ended up with a sub 650 OPS.

So, I’m calling for him to basically see a 30-75 point improvement, which would be a nice jump.

But hey, maybe he has figured something out and he will be a lot better than that. I just wouldn’t count on it until seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with .800-.850, and I think that is somewhat conservative. He is more balanced and athletic in the box. He isn’t pulling off as much, and he is getting to the balls on the outer half with the barrel. Watching his step in 2022, the way he stepped out, drove me nuts. He fixed that. He is staying inside the ball more on the outside pitch, so far, and he is often driving the outside pitch to RF. I hope that he stays with that approach, and not try to do too much. I still see him get around the ball and get pull happy sometimes, but it’s better.

Can he stay healthy? That is the bigger concern for me. He looks like he has gotten stronger, so hopefully he doesn’t wear down like he has done in the past. His stolen bases may not be as high as some might expect at the end of the season, due to the desire to keep him healthier. He hasn’t run as much lately, and I know the hip was an issue. Getting a premium athletic talent consistent MLB at bats with a good coaching environment, and playing a position he is comfortable in, he’s almost a baseball fairy tale right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The options given don’t give me the range I feel he falls in. I would have him in the 675-725 range.  
 

He had a similar stretch to this, albeit not quite as good, last year for about a month and he still ended up with a sub 650 OPS.

So, I’m calling for him to basically see a 30-75 point improvement, which would be a nice jump.

But hey, maybe he has figured something out and he will be a lot better than that. I just wouldn’t count on it until seeing it.

You just looked so lonely at the top of the poll graphic 🙂

Like I said, it wouldn't be impossible to see a collapse. Maybe he reverts to old habits, maybe pitchers adjust and he doesn't adjust, maybe there's a nagging injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was between .800-.849 and .850-.899 and took the conservative side of .800-.849 to anchor my excitement when he beats expectations!

The approach looks quasi-sustainable if he can keep his head on straight.  The muscle/athleticism is certainly a plus, but if his mind isn't right in the box, none of that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn’t realize/remember but Mateo also had a good run in July/August of 2021. So, this is the third time in his ML career that he has had a month worth of at bats where he put up far bigger numbers than the rest of his career.

Since 2021, Mateo has had 11 months where he had at least 30 at bats.

Of those 11 months, his OPS was over 800 in 3 of the months(including April 2023..or you could say over 800 twice  and over 1000 once if you prefer). It was over 700 in 2 other months (one was 701), 1 month over 600  and 5 months where his OPS was 566 or worse.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...