Jump to content

Pick one former Oriole at any stage of their career to add to the current team to make us serious WS contenders


GuidoSarducci

Recommended Posts

For pitchers, Palmer over Mussina and it is not even close. Can't go wrong with Frank Robinson either. As a fan, Boog Powell was my favorite as a young kid. 1970 MVP Boog would be a great upgrade too. 

Edited by MCO'sFan
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Except it is..peak Moose is right there with peak Palmer.

Maybe, I never really thought of Mussina as a true ACE. Maybe it was because he was on a lot of bad teams. For me, it's not even close. I would still take peak Palmer over Peak Mussina.  

Edited by MCO'sFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Palmer gives you 20 complete games.  Pitching every 5 days, instead of 4, probably gives you 230-240 innings, saving the bullpen.  But, 1966 Frank completely changed the Orioles.  If given one of each (pitcher/position), I'd go Palmer / Robinson over any other combination.

And, Frank would also make the pitching better...simply by demanding that they play better.  🙂

Edited by NCRaven
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCRaven said:

Palmer gives you 20 complete games.  Pitching every 5 days, instead of 4, probably gives you 230-240 innings, saving the bullpen.  But, 1966 Frank completely changed the Orioles.  If given one of each (pitcher/position), I'd go Palmer / Robinson over any other combination.

And, Frank would also make the pitching better...simply by demanding that they play better.  🙂

And McGinnity gives you 38 complete games, over 400 innings.  His WHIP was under 1, and he gave up  .2 HR/9!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

And McGinnity gives you 38 complete games, over 400 innings.  His WHIP was under 1, and he gave up  .2 HR/9!

Did he pitch every other day?  The game has really changed over the last 100 years.  Especially pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I’d go even farther. I’m not trading any of top 4 prospects including Kjerstad. I would not trade Cowser as well. We still have a large amount of depth in the system. A trade example would be Stowers, Norby, Liranzo, Forret, Elvin Garcia. That is plenty to get a number 2/3 starter. 
    • Ugh I hope not. Please move on from players that were brought in originally to tank     unless you do this to replace Mcdermott at AAA
    • Here’s another list from “the other guys”. It doesn’t appear Holliday is eligible here, just an FYI: Os have 4 on this list including Estrada and Etzel.
    • I don’t.  He passed rookie eligibility two years ago.   
    • I think Fangraphs decides who’s eligible as of the start of the season.  Unlike other publications that release all their team lists at the same time, Fangraphs slow rolls theirs over a 6 month period or so.   Therefore, to put all the teams on the same footing, they base eligibility as of the start of the season.   
    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...