Jump to content

Injury rehabbing players could determine Elias deadline moves


wildcard

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Ok whether or not you think those guys are just extra players, they are definitely going to impact things. It's incredibly stupid to think otherwise. 

People keep throwing out words like “stupid” and “dumbass” like a difference of opinion is in some way indicative of their intelligence. Sorry you disagree, but other than those initial 6 pitchers I mentioned, there aren’t any difference makers unless something significant changes in their ability to get major league hitters out. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Nobody wants to see that except Wildcard. 

To get a starter the caliber of Wells or Bradish Elias may have to give up a Kjerstad, Cowser, Westburg or Ortiz.   He may not want to do that.  There are players with 6 years of team control that will probably be everyday position players.

That's why he will consider what the O's minors and rehab players can offer the team.

So far the O's are in 2nd place in the AL with what they have.   There is a lot to consider.  I can't say what Elias will do.  I think he will be considering all 19 in house players.

As I have said I am in favor on trading Stowers, Norby, Haskin.   But I don't know that will bring back the kind of starter some posters want to add.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I said they could be factors. That is different than relying on them. I don't see anything in wildcard's post to suggest relying on them. And like I said, they should not preclude us from upgrading the team. Did anyone say we should pass on players performing now? I did not. 

The title and premise of the post? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Ok whether or not you think those guys are just extra players, they are definitely going to impact things. It's incredibly stupid to think otherwise. 

So, you believe that Elias will pass on pitching upgrades because of the injured/rehabbing guys?

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

To get a starter the caliber of Wells or Bradish Elias may have to give up a Kjerstad, Cowser, Westburg or Ortiz.   He may not want to do that.  There are players with 6 years of team control that will probably be everyday position players.

That's why he will consider what the O's minors and rehab players can offer the team.

So far the O's are in 2nd place in the AL with what they have.   There is a lot to consider.  I can't say what Elias will do.  I think he will be considering all 19 in house players.

What 19 players? The title of your post is about injury rehabbing players and if they could impact the deadline for the Os.

We have 19 guys on the IL that you think could impact that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

No, none of them. They aren’t good enough or reliable enough for it to impact anything for 2023 and a run at a WS. The need for a starter is there with or without Means (although I definitely could see them passing on a starter)

The need for legit back end arms doesn’t change as we hope Perez regains 2022 form or Tate/Givens get healthy and produce.  

None of these guys currently profile as pitchers to rely on, so no, you don’t stop yourself from making a move because of any of these guys.

I essentially agree with you.   If we are making any deadline moves, they shouldn't be moves that just add depth at the quality of pitcher we already have.  They should be upgrades, guys who slot in the top 3 of either our rotation or our bullpen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I essentially agree with you.   If we are making any deadline moves, they shouldn't be moves that just add depth at the quality of pitcher we already have.  They should be upgrades, guys who slot in the top 3 of either our rotation or our bullpen.  

Of course. We don’t need to add a new 6th man in the pen. You aren’t going to stop at acquiring a top BP arm because Hall may find his velo or Tate May all of a sudden find 2022 again. I mean, isn’t that obvious? 
 

I actually do think them not trading for a starter is a very real possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What 19 players? The title of your post is about injury rehabbing players and if they could impact the deadline for the Os.

We have 19 guys on the IL that you think could impact that?

Read the OP.  It is very clear who the 19 players are.  I even highlighted them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Then there is Means schedule to be back in August.   That is 8.  So even if GRod and Wells need to head to the pen to conserve innings, the O's may have starter answers in house.

For me, anything we get out of John Means this year will be found money at this point.  I just read that he is starting a rehab assignment in Aberdeen shortly, so I guess you are right that he could return to the big club in August.  But it's hard to know how effectively he will be, or what role he could play for the O's.   It would be great if he were able to help down the stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Of course. We don’t need to add a new 6th man in the pen. You aren’t going to stop at acquiring a top BP arm because Hall may find his velo or Tate May all of a sudden find 2022 again. I mean, isn’t that obvious? 
 

I actually do think them not trading for a starter is a very real possibility. 

So do I, because there aren't many quality starters who are likely to be on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

For me, anything we get out of John Means this year will be found money at this point.  I just read that he is starting a rehab assignment in Aberdeen shortly, so I guess you are right that he could return to the big club in August.  But it's hard to know how effectively he will be, or what role he could play for the O's.   It would be great if he were able to help down the stretch.

Elias has 20 days before the trade deadline to figure that out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Depends on the cost in prospects and money of the pitching upgrade.

That’s not the question I asked you. It’s always possible that they pass on guys because of cost. I’m asking if you actually believe the injury/rehab guys will be the reason he says no and stands Pat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Elias has 20 days before the trade deadline to figure that out.   

I don't think he will have a full answer on Means by then.   He'll probably have at most 4 rehab games by then and won't be fully built up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...