Jump to content

Os acquiring Fujinami for Easton Lucas


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, interloper said:

Perez needs to be replaced with a legit backend arm and then our bullpen is:

Bautista
Cano
[Replacement for Perez]
Fujinami
Coulombe
Baker
Irvin

 

If we got an established LHP I'd really like our rounded out bullpen. Maybe Raley from NYM or Suter from COL

 

Bautista

Cano

Raley/Suter

Fujinami

Coulombe

Baker

Irvin

Edited by G54377
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago, the 2023 version of Easton Lucas would absolutely have cracked the bullpen, and he was working his way into conversation as a guy to try in our rotational bullpen spot (Gillaspie, Vespi, Bazardo, etc). The thing is we're trying to eliminate that rotational spot as we head towards the playoffs. Gillaspie is now out and replaced with a guy with Felix-level Stuff+. 

Now we have to replace Perez, who instantly becomes the last man in the bullpen not counting the long man Irvin. 

Would the Orioles have added Lucas to the 40-man this offseason? Highly doubt. And with his good numbers he probably gets claimed by someone like Oakland. So you use him or lose him. It's a great use of resources. And a great job by the development staff turning a flier for Villar into a 100-mph bullpen arm in a playoff race. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Brooks Raley might be more cost effective if you can convince the Mets to trade. They need bullpen help too.

What's the story with Raley? I see he has a 7-year gap in his ML career lol. That's wild. 35 and arbitration eligible next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I am not mistaken, we would lose Lucas anyway this year in the Rule 5 draft- he'd be eligible to be taken and probably we have 40 other guys we'd need to protect.  Lots of teams would be willing to take a shot at a Lefty reliever with a 95 MPH fastball in the rule 5 draft.

 

So we get a 2 month rental of a potential quality back end reliever for a guy who'd likely be gone anyway...

 

Like Fujinama, but don't be overly wowed by the 100 MPH.  Scouts say it's very flat and straight.  My son plays 18U travel and I've seen him flail helplessly at 85 MPH fastballs with crazy movement and crush an 89 MPH fastball that was flat and straight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's grinding. Pretty cool. But I think we can do better. I'm a little gun-shy about a 35 year old suddenly having a 2 ERA and keeping that going deep into the playoffs. Unless of course we just don't give up a whole lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, interloper said:

That's grinding. Pretty cool. But I think we can do better. I'm a little gun-shy about a 35 year old suddenly having a 2 ERA and keeping that going deep into the playoffs. Unless of course we just don't give up a whole lot. 

Well he does have postseason experience which none of our pitchers do. Pretty good success aside from one disasterous 1/3 inning against CWS. and he would be under control for at least next year (?). We could probably get him for relatively little compared to say Hader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, G54377 said:

Well he does have postseason experience which none of our pitchers do. Pretty good success aside from one disasterous 1/3 inning against CWS. and he would be under control for at least next year (?). We could probably get him for relatively little compared to say Hader.

A 35-year old reliever with 1 more year of control and basically 2 good years in the MLs is an interesting thing to try and figure out value for. I could see Hyde valuing an older guy like this in the bullpen when he needs a trustworthy guy. 

Maybe someone like Brnovich or Zimmermann would get it most of the way done? Controllable pitchers with relief floors? Toss in a upside-y low A guy? Am I way undershooting it? I'm bad at this. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Damn I wish I was that guy
    • Crochet had a monstrous game tonight. 7 IP 2 H 1 ER 2 BB 13 Ks I would love to have him even if it meant moving him to the bullpen for the final stretch but someone is gonna drastically overpay for him with top of rotation potential and 2x additional seasons of club control.    assuming it starts with Mayo, Kjerstad, Povich etc 
    • I would like to see the O's have more success drafting and developing their own pitchers under Elias.  But I must concede that so far Elias has an excellent track record of getting good young controllable pitching from other teams farm systems  (Bradish, Povich, McDermott, Cano) or the waiver wire (Suarez, Webb, Perez).   The development of these pitchers suggests that we have excellent coaching in the high minors and in the majors.  There's more than one way to skin a cat. At this point I don't see a need to trade farm system capital for a top-line starting pitcher like Luzardo.  If the season ended today I'd feel really good about going into a playoff series with Burnes, Rodriguez and Bradish as our big three starters.   I also see no point in getting Crochet midseason as he's not going to be able to carry a starters' load into October.  It's more likely that we trade for bullpen help now, and then address starting pitching in the offseason if Burnes moves on.   
    • I would rather trade for Kikuchi than Luzardo. His FB has gotten hammered pretty much every year besides 2022 and he gets very few whiffs on it. His slider and changeup are both really good but he throws them less than 50% of the time combined. He could probably improve just by throwing those pitches more but not sure how successful he can truly be with that FB.
    • They made a conscious choice to not draft pitching, instead to let other teams, draft, pitching, and deal with the failures. I see their logic and I don’t disagree with it, but the flipside is that when you need pitching, you have to pay the going rate. And that’s something that Mike doesn’t seem to want to do.  And that’s a wee bit o’ trouble, it tis…
    • Let’s overpay a bit for Crotchett. No reason not to buy the best
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...