Jump to content

Nationals series


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, larrytt said:

Maybe I'm the only one, but I keep thinking, if we go, say, 5-1 the rest of the way, and the Braves stumble a bit and go 2-4 . . . we tie them for best record in the majors. Winning the division is what's important right now, but tying for (or having) the best record would be a fun thing to achieve. Sweeping the Nats would be a good start. 

Unfortunately even if that happened, they have the tiebreak by going 2 of 3 from us, so they would still have home field advantage in games 1, 2, 6, and 7 of the World Series.  We'd have to do even one better than that to get home field advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t be disturbed, but I’d be disappointed.  I want to clinch the division with as little suspense as possible. 

I'd love to go to the clinching game as I did in 2014, but I couldn't make it if it is tomorrow (or the weekend).   Only Thursday.

But I'll still root for them to win, and Tampa to lose, the next couple days.   If we clinch it and I can't be there, oh well.  I want it done as soon as possible.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torn between stretching it out as long as possible for possible clinch when I’m there Saturday vs. nailing it down ASAP to get my travel plans in place for the ALDS. 

Tie-breaker is having them dominate the Nats. It’s always sweet to disappoint the fans who abandoned the Os when the Nats came to town.

You know who ya are, ya damn bandwagoners. 😁
 

(Obviously want it ASAP for the team’s benefit and bc winning em all is the dream)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t be disturbed, but I’d be disappointed.  I want to clinch the division with as little suspense as possible. 

I agree, but I also think that there's a very strong chance that we start the Boston series with a magic number of 1. Not much suspense left there, IMO, with Toronto hosting the Rays for the final 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, justD said:

Torn between stretching it out as long as possible for possible clinch when I’m there Saturday vs. nailing it down ASAP to get my travel plans in place for the ALDS. 

Tie-breaker is having them dominate the Nats. It’s always sweet to disappoint the fans who abandoned the Os when the Nats came to town.

You know who ya are, ya damn bandwagoners. 😁

Yeah, I would like to see them clinch ASAP mostly because the Amtrak train fare from DC will get more expensive the longer I have to wait to buy (no way in hell I'm willingly subjecting myself to the parking/traffic hell that Game 1 would be). If they win tonight I might just purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I'd love to go to the clinching game as I did in 2014, but I couldn't make it if it is tomorrow (or the weekend).   Only Thursday.

But I'll still root for them to win, and Tampa to lose, the next couple days.   If we clinch it and I can't be there, oh well.  I want it done as soon as possible.  

I am going on Saturday and I have no interest in the Orioles dragging things out until then. I am more than fine with watching Jack Flaherty, James McCann, and Ryan McKenna get reps in a meaningless game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Kyle Bradish needs 3.1 more innings to get the 162 necessary to qualify for the ERA title.

He won't get the ERA title, but with his ERA at 3.01, it would be cool if he could lower it under 3.   Seems like it's been quite a while since the Orioles have had an ERA qualifier with an ERA under 3.

If he gives up 0 earned runs, and gets the 3.1 innings, he will have an ERA under 3.

If he gives up 1 earned runs and gets exactly 3.1 innings, his ERA will be 3.00.   If he gets 3.2 innings or more, his ERA would be under 3.

If he gives up 2 earned runs, 6.1 innings would get his ERA to 3.00 and 6.2 would get it to 2.99.

 

I was going to make a similar post in the Bradish thread, but you preempted me!  I wonder if Brandon Hyde will have any of this in mind as he decides how long to let Bradish work tonight, depending on the game situation.  

Is it a foregone conclusion that Bradish won’t pitch the season finale if the O’s have clinched?  I think so, but he’s going to have a LONG layoff if he doesn’t pitch from tonight until Oct. 7.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I agree, but I also think that there's a very strong chance that we start the Boston series with a magic number of 1. Not much suspense left there, IMO, with Toronto hosting the Rays for the final 4.

Toronto and Tampa play a 3 game series to end the season, not 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moshagge3 said:

I am going on Saturday and I have no interest in the Orioles dragging things out until then. I am more than fine with watching Jack Flaherty, James McCann, and Ryan McKenna get reps in a meaningless game.

Saturday's game is on Fox, not MASN, so I definitely want to see them clinch as soon as possible. Fox won't show much of the locker room celebration, so we would miss out on seeing the festivities if they clinch on Sat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...