Jump to content

Is Luzardo a realistic target?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Ken Rosenthal posted some speculation that the O’s could be chasing Jesus Luzardo.  I wouldn’t categorize this as a rumor, more just speculation on what could happen.  

Do you think Luzardo is a realistic target?  Wouid you rather have Luzardo than Cease?   What do you think it would it take to land Luzardo?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's realistic if the Marlins are willing to trade a 4-WAR SP, but there's no way of knowing that. It's annoyingly tough to tell sometimes whether Ken has a real rumor or if he's just throwing an article up like "you know what would be cool??" 

So, I'm skeptical it's more than pure speculation. But in a vacuum, sure, that would be amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I prefer Luzardo too.  That said I'm not sure on the cost.  Part of my issue is that some of the 'kids' I'm counting on this year to make us a better team overall (Westburg/Ortiz and Cowser/Kjerstad) would be those traded.  I'm not sure I want Luzardo if the cost is keeping Mateo/Urias on the roster and starting frequently because Westburg and Ortiz are gone.  Or not having a good plan for when Hays inevitably gets hurt and we can plug in Cowser/Kjerstad.  So it just depends on how much of the MLB ready players we'd have to trade to get Luzardo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistic in terms of being a good fit and our ability to match their price. I don't think it's realistic in terms of our willingness to part with elite prospects or Luzardo's availability. I would think we would need to give up at least Mayo or Basallo to get three years of a pitcher coming off a 4 WAR season. Trade Simulator has him as a 63 just as a point of reference.

I think Cabrera and Rogers are more realistic. Meyer would be a sneaky high risk/high reward target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to start a thread about Luzardo and Frobby beat me to it.

First of all, to answer the question, I think he’s realistic in the sense that Miami does have a lot of SP depth and since they aren’t going to be in the FA market either, at least not difference making talent market, they could move guys for positional talent if they get what they want.

The larger question to me is, how much should we want to give up for Luzardo?

He turned 26 at the end of September. 

Luzardo has been in the majors since 2019 and his 2023 season was easily the most innings he has ever thrown. In fact, he threw 40% of his career innings in 2023. He missed time in 2022 due to a forearm strain. His 2021 injury was a freak accident where he broke his pinky. 

His K rate was high in 2023 (and 2022), he misses a lot of bats and he threw strikes at the highest rate of his career in 2023, although throwing strikes has been an issue in the past. 

His statcast numbers have consistently shown a guy who is very mediocre at limiting hard contact.  Righties have him relatively well and lefties have struggled.

Luzardo is a Boras client and it appears he was a super 2 guy. He has 3 years of arbitration left.

Id take him for sure but im not sure I give up much more for him compared to Cease and if Cease is less to acquire by a decent amount, id prefer him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would take a big package, but they do need position players... Basallo, Kjerstad, Norby, Povich, McDermott, and maybe a youngster like Almeyda. That might not get it done though. They'll want Holliday but they can't have him. I would trade those six for him. Luzardo is everything I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orange said:

It would take a big package, but they do need position players... Basallo, Kjerstad, Norby, Povich, McDermott, and maybe a youngster like Almeyda. That might not get it done though. They'll want Holliday but they can't have him. I would trade those six for him. Luzardo is everything I want.

That’s a laughable package. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. This is the first I've heard of Luzardo possibly being available this offseason. Is he a realistic target? That depends. Are we willing to give up more than some of the proposed potential packages I've seen discussed for Cease? Because Luzardo might not be quite as proven as Cease, but he's a year young and is under contract (albeit arbitration eligible) for an extra year. I suspect he would command a bit more. In terms of performance, I'd prefer him a bit to Cease, mostly because he doesn't walk as many batters (55 vs 79 last season). I do think Luzardo is a bit more of an injury risk though. 

And I'm only citing this as a bench mark (i.e. don't kill the messenger), but Cease's surplus BTV is listed as 40.4 and Luzardo's is listed as 63.3.

In looking at the Marlin's roster their biggest immediate needs seem to be SS, OF, and DH (or 1B, depending on where they play Josh Bell). I know some will immediately suggest Santander or Mountcastle as possible fits, but they're not in the same stratosphere as Luzardo. If the Marlins want a veteran I think a trade based around Mullins + Westberg (if they believe in him as a SS) might get it done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orange said:

What would you offer?

 I can see a bunch of scenarios here. I could see Miami wanting an established Ml player because they aren’t rebuilding or anything.

Could they want Hays? Or Santander? I could see that.

But under zero circumstances am I even remotely considering our top 3 prospects.

Luzardo has proven less than many other options. He has the extra year but it’s an expensive year. He’s different than most guys who have 3 years left because he was a super 2 guy. 
 

I’m not going crazy for him. I’m fine with Cowser, Ortiz and Norby if they only want young cheap guys. I’d consider throwing in a 4th player but I think that’s starting to get crazy for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Bradley has pretty distinct splits. I think we throw all the LH bats at him tonight: (If Westburg is ready) Gunnar - SS Adley - C O'Hearn - 1B Santander - RF Cowser - LF Westburg - 3B Stowers - DH Mateo - 2B Mullins - CF
    • I don’t want to trade a promising pitcher. We’ve got plenty of position guys, they can get pitching somewhere else.
    • Scott has improved of late, but he’s still walking 7 guys per nine, he has a 1.4 WHIP, and is completely infuriating. When he was here he drove everybody nuts, and when the Marlins traded for him, I knew there was something seriously wrong with that braintrust. Im backing off of Miller, I think he’s coming to earth, and is always close to a TJ vacation, but Scott isn’t the answer at all.
    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...