Jump to content

Bloomberg: Carlyle Group/David Rubenstein In Talks To Purchase Orioles


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

Just now, ThisIsBirdland said:

Or he's looking at a relatively short window to make his mark and doesn't view the Adley/Gunnar/Holliday era as a time to pinch pennies.

I'm sure this is much more about making money for him than it is about his abiding interest in the career of Adley Rutschman.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

To be clear, Carlyle Group’s David Rubinstein is in talks to buy the Orioles.  It’s not really correct to say “Carlyle Group/David Rubinstein” as the Carlyle Group would not be involved in the potential transaction.

Good catch. If someone can update the title I'd appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

No, I just think it's weird that, after 30 years of mostly terrible ownership, the Angelos family could be looking to sell and your first thought is "Jeez, that guy is old, it would suck to have to go through this again in 10 years."

I mean, if that's your reality, that's cool.  I think most of us would just be thrilled to get Angelos gone.

Pretty much any name besides Dan Snyder is good news 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

I'm sure this is much more about making money for him than it is about his abiding interest in the career of Adley Rutschman.  

Not interest in the career of Adley Rutschman. Interest in buying a baseball team to produce a winner. Some of these billionaires actually value a winning legacy when they buy these teams. Can't speak for Rubenstein but that's obviously the hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

No, I just think it's weird that, after 30 years of mostly terrible ownership, the Angelos family could be looking to sell and your first thought is "Jeez, that guy is old, it would suck to have to go through this again in 10 years."

I mean, if that's your reality, that's cool.  I think most of us would just be thrilled to get Angelos gone.

Peter was a terrible owner.  John has been ok as an acting boss.  He's annoying, and he would do well to stfu, but he's done EXACTLY what we all called for for decades: Hire a competent baseball man and gtfo of the way.  And it has worked out wonderfully for us.

The biggest problem with him is he is cash poor.

I guess what I'm saying is it really is possible to get a worse ownership group than what we currently have.  The next time the owner loses continence, which with this guy could be very soon, we have no idea what we would get.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Not interest in the career of Adley Rutschman. Interest in buying a baseball team to produce a winner. Some of these billionaires actually value a winning legacy when they buy these teams. Can't speak for Rubenstein but that's obviously the hope.

Almost all of those billionaires care more about making money- that's why they're billionaires.  And you'll watch, those ownership groups in SD and NY will act much differently as the financial losses mount up.  In fact, we're already seeing that play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

Peter was a terrible owner.  John has been ok as an acting boss.  He's annoying, and he would do well to stfu, but he's done EXACTLY what we all called for for decades: Hire a competent baseball man and gtfo of the way.  And it has worked out wonderfully for us.

The biggest problem with him is he is cash poor.

I guess what I'm saying is it really is possible to get a worse ownership group than what we currently have.  The next time the owner loses continence, which with this guy could be very soon, we have no idea what we would get.

@Sports Guywill be here shortly to tell you that you're wrong and that he hasn't gotten out of the way.

Sure, it's possible to get a worse owner, but I think it would be really hard to do so. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

@Sports Guywill be here shortly to tell you that you're wrong and that he hasn't gotten out of the way.

Sure, it's possible to get a worse owner, but I think it would be really hard to do so. 

My bigger concern is getting another incapacitated owner, and this guy is 75 years old, so it's only a matter of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rubenstein is one of only 5 Marylanders on the Forbes 400. The other 4 are Annette Lerner (Ted's widow), Mitchell Rales, Jim Davis (cousin and business partner of Steve Bisicotti), and Dan Snyder. Bisciotti himself is no longer a Maryland resident, having moved to Florida.

Not too many options for local billionaires. 

Edited by MurphDogg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...