Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Before the offseason got going there was some talk of an MOO bat.
So after the signing of Othani, JD Martinez obviously wont be returning to the Dodgers. Obviously Mountcastle and or Santander would have to go but he only made $10 million last year. What if he could be brought in on a similar deal. His .270s avg, 33 homers, 103 RBIs and near .900 OPS would look good in the middle of our lineup. He’s more consistent than Mountcastle. Thoughts?

Given the way the team valued flexibility in 2023, I don't believe Elias would be interested in a dedicated DH.  Martinez only played 3 games in the OF since 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Earl Buck said:

How does the Othani deal affect the remainder free agent contracts? $70 million per season, deferred or not, is a huge increase from other top contracts in MLB. 

I don’t think it will have any effect on 98% of the contracts signed (or anyone the Orioles would ever touch). Obviously the agents of the superstars will reference it often and use it as a benchmark, but it’s not going to have any bearing on rank-and-file players or minor stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, InsideCoroner said:

I don’t think it will have any effect on 98% of the contracts signed (or anyone the Orioles would ever touch). Obviously the agents of the superstars will reference it often and use it as a benchmark, but it’s not going to have any bearing on rank-and-file players or minor stars.

I believe you are wrong. There will be a significant "trickle down impact". Do you think the number Gunnar/Boras may have been seeking to sign a long-term contract stayed the same after Oh's signing? Adley?? Soto next year..I mean, didn't Soto turn down 10-440 from the Nats? You don't think agents have a new baseline for stars?? And if teams can't afford the stars, it makes secondary players more expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

I have no faith in Elias' ability to make a legitimate trade at this point (until I see it happen). I also don't like the idea of adding a true DH only player because it's going to take significant playing time away from Kjerstad. If Kjerstad isn't traded he needs to play this season. It's time to sh*t or get off the pot with some of these young rookies. 

Elias mentioned Heston would see plenty of RF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Earl Buck said:

How does the Othani deal affect the remainder free agent contracts? $70 million per season, deferred or not, is a huge increase from other top contracts in MLB. 

Not as much as you would think. Although the AAV is $70m I have seen that with the deferred money it is closer to $55m (ESPN).  That being said, no other play can provide the additional revenue Ohtani can (sponsorship, signage, suites, premium tix) so with all the money he brings in the true cost is lower.  The Dodgers own their own RSN so they can also take advantage of increased ad revenue something others cannot.  This was the reason Toronto was interested in Ohtani as they have all of Canada as a market.  Remember the Dodgers are essentially at capacity so they really won't sell more tickets.

The Dodgers have a big issue in that the even though there is deferred money the AAV for the competitive balance tax is $70m.  In the past they have vowed not to go over the tax threshold but since they have to fill out the roster they have no choice.  This means every contract going forward (arb is already figured in) will be at a ~30% premium which means they would prefer players under control which means the Orioles have more competition for guys like Cease.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AlbNYfan said:

I believe you are wrong. There will be a significant "trickle down impact". Do you think the number Gunnar/Boras may have been seeking to sign a long-term contract stayed the same after Oh's signing? Adley?? Soto next year..I mean, didn't Soto turn down 10-440 from the Nats? You don't think agents have a new baseline for stars?? And if teams can't afford the stars, it makes secondary players more expensive.

Ohtani is in a class by himself because of the revenue he brings with him. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...