Jump to content

Long Elias Interview Today (1/25)


Aglets

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I agree on Tampa and Toronto, but I think the Red Sox have definitely improved their offense quite a bit. Getting full seasons out of Story and Duran should give them a boost and I think O'Neil and Grissom are better than the offensive players they lost and/or traded. I acutalll like their lineup quite a bit. Their starting pitching though, not so much. 

Duran never hit before last year and had a .429 BABIP in a career first half.  Back to a .669 OPS in the 2nd half.  Guess we’ll see.   Tyler O’Neill had a career year in 2021.  Otherwise he’s been a light hitting corner OF.   They lost Turner and get Story back, presumably at full strength.    I see a lot of chairs moving around but that’s about it.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

In general.

 

Ok.  Cause the 3 starters, Springs, Rasmussen, and McLanahan are down for awhile.  Springs had his TJ last April, Rasmussen in July, and McLanahan in August.   The last two might not pitch at all this year.   I’m not sure which position players missed significant time last year so I’m not exactly where the big boost is coming from better health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Ok.  Cause the 3 starters, Springs, Rasmussen, and McLanahan are down for awhile.  Springs had his TJ last April, Rasmussen in July, and McLanahan in August.   The last two might not pitch at all this year.   I’m not sure which position players missed significant time last year so I’m not exactly where the big boost is coming from better health.

Who said big boost?

They won 99 games last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Ok.  Cause the 3 starters, Springs, Rasmussen, and McLanahan are down for awhile.  Springs had his TJ last April, Rasmussen in July, and McLanahan in August.   The last two might not pitch at all this year.   I’m not sure which position players missed significant time last year so I’m not exactly where the big boost is coming from better health.

Yeah I don’t expect these guys all back or necessarily pitching well, and Franco is gone. That said, they are an incredibly effective org at developing pitching and picking up scrap heap to fill positional needs, and coming off a 99 win season.

The Yankees getting healthy is the bigger risk, and the Blue Jays have been good  for a few years now and could finally roll off a luckier year, imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Who said big boost?

They won 99 games last year.

Well, about 11.5 war from last years team is either out for the year, on the Dodgers, or in jail, so they probably do need a boost from somewhere. But they are good at filling gaps out of thin air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Who said big boost?

They won 99 games last year.

Ok.  You said better.  They won’t have their ace, another key starter in Rasmussen, and Glasgow which all helped them win those 99 games plus it looks like Franco is gone for the foreseeable future, plus Stephenson, who was lights out in the bullpen.  Caminero looks like a potential ROY and impact bat.   I’m not sure how that all adds up to better.  Seems like they lost more than they gained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, brooooksy said:

Yeah I don’t expect these guys all back or necessarily pitching well, and Franco is gone. That said, they are an incredibly effective org at developing pitching and picking up scrap heap to fill positional needs, and coming off a 99 win season.

The Yankees getting healthy is the bigger risk, and the Blue Jays have been good  for a few years now and could finally roll off a luckier year, imo

Anything can happen and the off season isn’t over.  Pennants aren’t won on paper but Toronto looks weaker right now.   A lot depends on which version of Vlad Jr. shows up this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Anything can happen and the off season isn’t over.  Pennants aren’t won on paper but Toronto looks weaker right now.   A lot depends on which version of Vlad Jr. shows up this year.

They’ve got a lot of variables there, including Manoah. They just haven’t all aligned yet and they’ve been hanging around 90 wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, brooooksy said:

They’ve got a lot of variables there, including Manoah. They just haven’t all aligned yet and they’ve been hanging around 90 wins

They have a pretty bad manager who is doing a nice job limiting their overall potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Manoah can get back to like 260 and get his speed and confidence back he would be a massive infusion for them.  I wonder what his body looks like in spring training.   If not he might be on his way to becoming the next Sydney Ponson.

Edited by Gurgi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Bradley has pretty distinct splits. I think we throw all the LH bats at him tonight: (If Westburg is ready) Gunnar - SS Adley - C O'Hearn - 1B Santander - RF Cowser - LF Westburg - 3B Stowers - DH Mateo - 2B Mullins - CF
    • I don’t want to trade a promising pitcher. We’ve got plenty of position guys, they can get pitching somewhere else.
    • Scott has improved of late, but he’s still walking 7 guys per nine, he has a 1.4 WHIP, and is completely infuriating. When he was here he drove everybody nuts, and when the Marlins traded for him, I knew there was something seriously wrong with that braintrust. Im backing off of Miller, I think he’s coming to earth, and is always close to a TJ vacation, but Scott isn’t the answer at all.
    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...