Jump to content

Jackson Holliday 2024


btdart20

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Thank you.  Not sure how easy for someone who may have been doing it for years and someone who’s been talented enough to make it work.   Someone posted a video of Freddie Freeman and Holliday to show similarities but, to me, it just showed how different their lead foot was.  Freeman’s was closed and perfectly in line and parallel to his back foot.  Hollidays foot pointed out and the foot towards 2B position.  I questioned it.  Other guys, who admittedly know more, said it was no problem.  Again, he might be able to become a HOF with those mechanics.  I’ve just never seen a good ML hitter hit that way.

From that early January thread

“I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.”

Edited January 6 by RZNJ

I’m not sure how it resembles Freeman’s stride in any way.  He quickly picks his foot up while inwardly rotating his ankle and knee and then essentially drops it back in the same spot. Kind of like Mayo.  Much simpler. I do think that for a player of Jackson’s talent it would a pretty straightforward fix. Sure it may take some time. Also possible that it’s gotten more pronounced up here as he tries to sell out for some more power to make a splash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joelala said:

I’m not sure how it resembles Freeman’s stride in any way.  He quickly picks his foot up while inwardly rotating his ankle and knee and then essentially drops it back in the same spot. Kind of like Mayo.  Much simpler. I do think that for a player of Jackson’s talent it would a pretty straightforward fix. Sure it may take some time. Also possible that it’s gotten more pronounced up here as he tries to sell out for some more power to make a splash. 

I and no one else that I know said anything about their strides being comparable.  Someone else noted some similarities in their swings, IIRC.   I pointed out the difference in their strides which again aligned with my belief that Holliday’s stride was unorthodox, at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I and no one else that I know said anything about their strides being comparable.  Someone else noted some similarities in their swings, IIRC.   I pointed out the difference in their strides which again aligned with my belief that Holliday’s stride was unorthodox, at best.

You’re right, I misread. But yes it is unorthodox at best lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Statcast also said Adley's exit velocity on a ball he ripped to left field last night in Game 2 was only 70 something MPH. Even @Frobby called BS on that.

You are comparing Statcast's reading on one ball to Statcast's data on every ball Jackson's hit?

A launch angle of 4.4 degrees is extremely low, that's Vlad Jr in 2020 low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

You are comparing Statcast's reading on one ball to Statcast's data on every ball Jackson's hit?

A launch angle of 4.4 degrees is extremely low, that's Vlad Jr in 2020 low.

It was actually several plays in the game around the same time, but I digress. I'm simply saying they're prone to make mistakes. And if they make mistakes on data input, then it's difficult to trust all the data to base a conclusion on, as if the data was 100% completely accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

It was actually several plays in the game around the same time, but I digress. I'm simply saying they're prone to make mistakes. And if they make mistakes on data input, then it's difficult to trust all the data to base a conclusion on, as if the data was 100% completely accurate.

I think the Statcast data is way more reliable than the eye test it replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think the Statcast data is way more reliable than the eye test it replaced.

I didn't need statcast to tell me Griffey Jr. hit the ball hard with good launch angles, or that Randy Johnson had great extension and a high whiff rate. ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Hopefully Jackson reads this thread so he can figure things out.  He really needs to immediately abandon what’s been successful for him.  

Actually Jackson and I are DM'ing right now.  After we're done messaging, he's going to go straight to the cage and work on my suggestions about how to time his leg kick better.

Talented kid, just needs some guidance.

Edited by yark14
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Am I looking at this data wrong?

Statcast shows Jackson's Launch angle to be 4.4 degrees.

There’s a big difference between launch angle and attack angle. 

Launch angle is ball coming off bat (results of contact). Attack angle is angle of bat through zone.  
 

4.4 attack angle is good but slightly high.  4.4 launch angle is terrible result.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think the Statcast data is way more reliable than the eye test it replaced.

There are issue with readings, just like everything else in life. It’s not perfect.  I’ve seen thousands of balls put in play using tech and can tell you that flat out there are mistakes. 
 

Maintenance, calibration, location of hardware all in play.  

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • One thing I noticed and don’t care for is…….” We have Bautista coming back so we don’t need to sign All-star FA closer “  and “ since we have Elfin coming back we dont need resign Burnes “ and “ we have Bradish returning from injury so why we need another FA starter ? “  My point is that we can’t count on Bautista , Bradish , Wells , Means & others to return and pick up where they left off .  I advocate Elias to strike hard and fast during upcoming Free Agency season .  
    • Hey man, It breaks my heart that the O’s destroyed our season of hope. Hyde’s got to go. Watching those post-game excuses and lack of fire is not good for inspiration - club house or fans!. Pathetic. Call out stuff, not play victim. Apparently every team had amazing pitching! (Eye roll). A re-set is going to happen. A few more guys getting experience, a few guys going away, and revamping that horrible bullpen. Easy moves: let Santander walk, don’t waste money on LT contracts for SP - even Burnes, get Alex Bregman! , get more speed!   
    • Division is going to be tough next year.  Rays have reloaded, Red Sox have a new core in place and will likely supplement with a big Fa splash or two, and the Yankees will continue to be the Yankees. Ultimately O’s success or lack thereof will rest on the improvement of their young positional talent, but seems like we need to add some kind of weapon vs left handed pitching.  And will need to either replace or resign Burnes, not something easy to do without significant financial investment.  
    • I think the 10 straight postseason losses have/will continue their toll on O’s fans . When doubts and pessimism about the team’s performance, the empty seats could still be issue when next October comes .  My hope is Rubenstein and Elias will conclude that status quo is NOT acceptable . 
    • Look, I don't want to insult you or anybody else, but arguing that a 55 win team is the same as a 95 win team is moronic beyond belief. It's just that simple.
    • So everything is great as long as we just make the playoffs? At what point is expecting to win a playoff game acceptable? Isn’t the goal to win a WS or is it to win more than 80 games? If we’re just going to keep failing when it really matters in the playoffs then 55 wins or 95 wins doesn’t make a difference in the grand scheme of things. In fact, you could argue 55 is better for the long term. 
    • Right right after both Adley and Hyde have been saying for 2 months that he is completely healthy 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...