Jump to content

Jackson Holliday 2024


btdart20

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

John Wockenfuss had one of the strangest stances. He used to have both feet facing away from the pitcher. ERyqJwJXYAA4TDe.jpg.810cebb3a7878f4013682da266011fcf.jpg

Yep. Dan Ford was similar, but he wasn't so far back in the box, and his feet were spread out more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yep. Dan Ford was similar, but he wasn't so far back in the box, and his feet were spread out more.

I believe Dan Ford just had his front foot back like that , but extremely closed.

I remember batting like that once in Little League because of that and hit one on the longest home runs I ever hit at that age. Then, I made a couple of outs and ditched it to more of a regular stance. haha....

Anyways, as for Jackson Holliday stance, legs kicks work for some and not for others. The key is to get it down in time and being able to pick up spin and movement early enough. To me, Holliday just got behind in too many counts because of some great pitches on the edges of the strikezone. 

I'm not a swing expert, but I've seen the kid hit well against all types of pitches including velocity so i think he's going to be just fine.

He's gotten on base a lot more down in AAA where the automated strike zone helps him with his great eye, but hasn't hot for much average or power since going back down (.242./432./364./795 with a 11-9 BB to K in 44 PAs. The Ks are still a bit high in AAA. 

He just needs more seasoning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Otter said:

I think you make an important point about the automated strike zone in the minors helping Holliday.  It seems in the past year I've noticed that rookies with excellent plate discipline seem to get affected much more by the wandering zones of certain MLB umpires.  They seem to know the zone better than the umpires and have been rewarded for that in the minors.  We saw last year that Henderson struggled at first even though he was still walking, and then got hot when he became much more aggressive early in the count and not letting himself fall behind.  I noticed it with Cowser last year, and with Holliday this year.  They seem utterly perplexed when umps call pitches three inches off the corner.

Gotta start sending these kids to CB Bucknor and Hernandez simulator or make them read Hernandez's art of the strike zone book that all bad umpires consult. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I do think part of the problem of Orioles trained hitters when they arrive in the majors are the "wandering" strike zones of major league umpires. The Orioles minor league hitters are awarded positive scores for an at bat even when they are called out on strikes that are not really strikes. 

They are trained to not swing at pitches that they can't do damage on so they typically don't attack many pitches off the zone or near the edges unless they were fooled by the pitch. 

When they get to the majors, they have that same approach. Adley, Gunnar, Cowser, and Holliday all struggled at times by getting behind in counts and having to hit 1-2 or 0-2 too often, many times due to close pitches that were out of the zone getting called strikes. Westburg seemed to make the adjustments the best by cutting down his swing and going for contact over power initially. His power numbers were not good last year, but now he's made the adjustments and can now let it rip.

 

Great insights.  We've seen the same thing happen with all of our recent prospects.  Hopefully, this winning will let our batters start getting some respect on their names with the umps.  I like how none of them really argue, and last night O'Hearn sort of took one for the team/youngins.  I like Hyde.  Great manager, but maybe he needs to be a little more vocal with these umps.  We've done the nice guy act.  Now it's time to win when everyone is gunning for us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Frobby said:

I would not expect a player who’s been as successful as Holliday to start overhauling his mechanics based on a couple of bad weeks in his major league debut.  

I'm kind of torn on this. A lot of slumps happen just because timing is off, nothing mechanical. Sometimes you're hot and sometimes you're cold. It's easily possible that Holliday's feel for hitting just had a slump at the wrong time. That happens.

I know a hitting coach who talks about Pujols. When he went into a slump, he'd widen his stance and not even step. He removed all of that movement and basically hit with his hands and ungodly power. It was basically the same 2-strike approach that a lot of hitters employ.

For my money, I don't love the huge load and leg kick. I think it really lengthens the swing in an attempt to generate power. When I saw Holliday, his swing looked just like that. Too long to catch up to elite ML pitching. Now maybe it was just a slump, but I'd personally prefer to see less movement, more contact, and progress from contact to power as he gets comfortable in the majors.

And I know nothing, but that's my view of things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I believe Dan Ford just had his front foot back like that , but extremely closed.

I remember batting like that once in Little League because of that and hit one on the longest home runs I ever hit at that age. Then, I made a couple of outs and ditched it to more of a regular stance. haha....

Anyways, as for Jackson Holliday stance, legs kicks work for some and not for others. The key is to get it down in time and being able to pick up spin and movement early enough. To me, Holliday just got behind in too many counts because of some great pitches on the edges of the strikezone. 

I'm not a swing expert, but I've seen the kid hit well against all types of pitches including velocity so i think he's going to be just fine.

He's gotten on base a lot more down in AAA where the automated strike zone helps him with his great eye, but hasn't hot for much average or power since going back down (.242./432./364./795 with a 11-9 BB to K in 44 PAs. The Ks are still a bit high in AAA. 

He just needs more seasoning. 

This is how I see it.  I question his swing decisions more so than his mechanics.  He was absolutely pitched to and fell behind in what felt like every AB.  It seemed like everyone  threw absolutely perfect pitches and he didn’t get many breaks with calls.  I think he will build off the experience and hit the ground running next time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

John Wockenfuss had one of the strangest stances. He used to have both feet facing away from the pitcher. ERyqJwJXYAA4TDe.jpg.810cebb3a7878f4013682da266011fcf.jpg

Looks a lot like Tettleton but not as much “bat hug”.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

This is how I see it.  I question his swing decisions more so than his mechanics.  He was absolutely pitched to and fell behind in what felt like every AB.  It seemed like everyone  threw absolutely perfect pitches and he didn’t get many breaks with calls.  I think he will build off the experience and hit the ground running next time.  

Spot on.  We're also getting everyone's best shot this year, and I'm sure pitcher's didn't want a 21 year old teeing off on them.  So that little bit of competitive extra motivation means alot at this level.  He wasn't flying under the radar in the 9th spot.  

With that said, would he see better pitches hitting 2nd in between Gunnar and Adley?  Pitchers wont have that luxury of facing him at the bottom of the lineup where they can drop in their ungodly breaking stuff on the corners.  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/7/2024 at 4:37 PM, Tony-OH said:

John Wockenfuss had one of the strangest stances. He used to have both feet facing away from the pitcher. ERyqJwJXYAA4TDe.jpg.810cebb3a7878f4013682da266011fcf.jpg

And didn't he also do something with his fingers that was unusual?   Like twiddling them constantly while awaiting the pitch instead of just gripping the bat steadily with them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...