Jump to content

2024 Ongoing Lineup Thread

spleen1015

By spleen1015
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Frobby
Frobby

Ah, another year of second guessing the lineup every single day!  

Fiver6565
Fiver6565

I don’t know why people keep lumping O’Hearn in on posts like this. The guy had one of the few over .800 OPS on the team last year. He’s not remotely the problem. 

Frobby
Frobby

I heard that he was initially scheduled to be DH, but told Hyde, “if Burnes doesn’t want me to catch him, then I don’t wanna play!”  Then he was seen softly sobbing in a corner of the locker room.   

Posted Images

sportsfan8703 Hangout Grand Counsel

sportsfan8703

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

image.thumb.jpeg.ba0d85bdaa8c6c60a932992129400bc8.jpeg

This lineup makes a lot of sense. We’re not trying to lose this series. A lineup. Possible playoff preview if things stay the same roster wise. Mounty batting 7th with a RHP. Cowser and his .600 OPS since April is sitting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sports Guy Hangout Grand Counsel

Sports Guy

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pickles said:

As we've seen with Cowser, they're willing to give guys more and more ABs based on performance, and that includes against same handed pitchers.

Nobody is just going to be handed an every day position- as you define it- coming out of the MiLs w the possible exception of Holliday, and we saw even that was not open-ended.

Never asked for everyday..but real opportunity should be there and hiding behind some stupid archaic rule when the info you actually have suggests otherwise is dumb.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pickles Hangout Grand Counsel

Pickles

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Never asked for everyday..but real opportunity should be there and hiding behind some stupid archaic rule when the info you actually have suggests otherwise is dumb.

 

Westburg is an every day guy this year.

Holliday was given every day reps when he was up.  I suspect when they bring him back up, they'll bring him back up when they're ready to do that again.

Cowser played himself into an every day role, and now they've backed off on that a bit since he's been scuffling.

Kjerstad, this call up, has been playing almost every day.  He's played 10 of 13 games since his call up in June.

Who are all these guys not getting opportunities?

The one with a legit beef is probably Stowers, but unfortunately for him he's been surpassed by Cowser and Kjerstad.  Surely you don't want Stowers getting Abs over those guys.

So exactly who isn't getting an opportunity?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sports Guy Hangout Grand Counsel

Sports Guy

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Westburg is an every day guy this year.

Holliday was given every day reps when he was up.  I suspect when they bring him back up, they'll bring him back up when they're ready to do that again.

Cowser played himself into an every day role, and now they've backed off on that a bit since he's been scuffling.

Kjerstad, this call up, has been playing almost every day.  He's played 10 of 13 games since his call up in June.

Who are all these guys not getting opportunities?

The one with a legit beef is probably Stowers, but unfortunately for him he's been surpassed by Cowser and Kjerstad.  Surely you don't want Stowers getting Abs over those guys.

So exactly who isn't getting an opportunity?

 

 

 

Are you actually following the conversation or are you just trying to argue?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dystopia Hangout Grand Counsel

dystopia

Posted
Posted

I don’t know whose turn it is in the Cubs rotation for tomorrow, but if it’s a RHP, I’d like to see Kjerstad DH, Cowser in left, and O’Hearn and 1st with Mounty on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rbiggs2525 All-Star

Rbiggs2525

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, dystopia said:

I don’t know whose turn it is in the Cubs rotation for tomorrow, but if it’s a RHP, I’d like to see Kjerstad DH, Cowser in left, and O’Hearn and 1st with Mounty on the bench. 

I believe we are getting there 3 best pitchers. Imonaga, Tailon, Steele. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bemorewins Hangout Grand Counsel

Bemorewins

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Of course we are. 

While those three SP are pretty good. The Cubs problem is their bullpen but even more so (like much of MLB) their offense.

I'm very confident that we will handle them like we do everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RZNJ Hangout Grand Counsel

RZNJ

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

I think we will struggle to score runs against these guys.  Imanaga is the real deal, the kind of pitcher that will give us fits.

Can you get Roy to start a thread on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bemorewins Hangout Grand Counsel

Bemorewins

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

I think we will struggle to score runs against these guys.  Imanaga is the real deal, the kind of pitcher that will give us fits.

Yawn.... Orioles record 57- 33. Cubs record 42- 49. 

I like our chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bemorewins Hangout Grand Counsel

Bemorewins

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I like our chances against them but this smells like a bit of a trap series, too. @Sanity Checkis right, Imanaga seems to be the type that will give us fits.  

I acknowledge that the 3 starters that they have going this series are very good. But their offense and pen are not. I don't worry much about "trap series" or even "big series" with this team. Over the last year and a half (in the regular season) they tend to roll no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Pickles
      Elias: It's on me

      By Pickles · Posted

      I don't remember those conversations.  I pegged them at 90-95 wins in the poll, so there's no way I wouldn't have believed they could win 88 games.  Which of course they didn't, even with the injuries and underperformance. The biggest thing I remember arguing with you about last off-season was that we didn't need to give Ortiz and Cowser up to get Burnes and it would be foolish to give up them both.  I specifically argued that we didn't need to trade Ortiz as we could find a place for him to play, specifically citing the likelihood of injury. I really think you're thinking about somebody else.  I'm also not sure why you think you were one of the voices arguing for "depth" as you were willing to lose Mateo and Urias for basically nothing, and they both contributed to this team and were a bulwark against injury/underperformance.  You were willing to trade Cowser and where would we have been without him? This team's performance this year was well within the boundaries of what I expected, if a bit on the lower end.  The only thing confusing to me about it was what happened to Rutschman. That said, my "confusion" is what is the best path forward.
    • Roll Tide
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Roll Tide · Posted

      I think he’s getting somewhere around $180 million
    • Sports Guy
      Elias: It's on me

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      I agree with all of this but I also believe you took winning for granted. You argued with me in the offseason when I said this team could win as low as 88 games. You said no way, they are too talented, etc…you never wanted to take injuries into account. You felt the depth was too good, etc… Part of the reason you are lost, imo, is because you didn’t feel this scenario existed for this team.
    • Can_of_corn
      Elias: It's on me

      By Can_of_corn · Posted

      This is funny. The Guardians were 12th in HR and 14th in scoring.  I guess their run scoring w/out HR wasn't that great. Seven of the top 10 teams in HR made the playoffs with AZ being one of the ones that didn't. 
    • Can_of_corn
      Walltimore

      By Can_of_corn · Posted

      Two Bergmans wouldn't be the worst thing to have. In case one gets his hand broke by a HBP or something.
    • Too Tall
      Elias: It's on me

      By Too Tall · Posted

      It's baseball the way good teams play it. Been played that way before and will be played that way again and again and hopefully in Baltimore next year and beyond. Not easy to do but quite effective. Man I wish we had a Kwan (hear me Holliday???????)
    • eddie83
      Elias: It's on me

      By eddie83 · Posted

      SSS   CLE BA was .238. BAL .250. OBP for CLE was .308 and for BAL it was .315.    The Orioles terrible at bats in the playoffs are on the players. 

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...