Jump to content

It’s a slump. It happens. Some thoughts.


eddie83

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Mateo has a .931 OPS vs LHP. Last year it was .746. He can play SS and even some OF.  More than fine for a platoon tyoe player. 
 

Mayo is does not have a good glove at 3rd. I like Urias but he hasn’t been hitting. 

Again, as I mentioned in my post that you're replying to, the OPS is a mirage propped up by 2 home runs. Mateo won't keep that up, even against lefties.

If Mateo settles at .700-.750 OPS against LHP for the season, which is a reasonable projection, he'll be OPSing below that range the rest of the season. That's NOT worth his glove at 2B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I have no problem with Mateo playing right now. He saved Burnes a lot of runs with a couple of excellent double plays last night. The #9 hitter is not the issue. 

You say "right now" as if his production at the plate will continue. It won't, it's only going to get worse. And it's not good to begin with.

There's no reason to believe in Mateo aside from small sample size luck. He's just being given preferential treatment because he's a vet, and, similarly to Ryan McKenna, Elias refuses to cut ties with a bad player. That's not good baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I love and believe in Holliday's talent and potential, we have seen time and time again now that prospect rankings matter very little when it comes to getting immediate results at the Major League level. Jackson Chourio was what #2 prospect and what is he doing right now? - .207/.254/.322/.576

Those numbers are not better than Jorge Mateo believe it or not.

It goes further than that though. Look at most of the top prospect from last year who have graduated to the MLB. Yes you have Gunnar, Volpe, Casas, Westburg, Jung, Jackson Merrill, and De La Cruz. But look at how bad Carroll has regressed. Look at Francisco Alverarez, Jordan Walker, Brett Baty, Crow-Armstrong, Frelick, Evan Carter, and Wyatt Langford.

I would say that the odds are way less than 50-50 given just those 20 or so examples that even a young stud makes an immediate impact. Sure we can be optimistic/hopeful. But the reality is that in 2024 making the jump from AAA to MLB may be harder than ever. And there are no guarantees that your most promising young players will be able to figure things out right away. That's just not very realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

You say "right now" as if his production at the plate will continue. It won't, it's only going to get worse. And it's not good to begin with.

There's no reason to believe in Mateo aside from small sample size luck. He's just being given preferential treatment because he's a vet, and, similarly to Ryan McKenna, Elias refuses to cut ties with a bad player. That's not good baseball.

Urias .497 OPS might be a mirage and Mateo .706 OPS might be a mirage but they both happened and right NOW I’ll take the Mateo mirage.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust Hays to play some CF.

Since 2020, he's been worth +2 DRS as a centerfielder in 274.2 innings at the position. 

In that time, Mullins has been worth +15 DRS as a centerfielder in 4,044.1 innings.

 

I'm not saying he's a better defender than Mullins. I also know there are a lot of different and imperfect stats when it comes to defense. But I think it's promising that he's averaging +1 DRS every 137 innings as a CF, considering Mullins is averaging +1 DRS every 270.

I also think Mullins will heat back up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Urias has a proven track record of good defense at 3B and as a much better hitter than Mateo. That's why it's better for the team to play Urias instead of buying into the mirage of another "hot" start by Mateo. Mateo is still the same bad player he's always been.

Ultimately, I prefer calling up Mayo after Super 2 passes. Until then, I'd rather see Urias in the lineup. Everyone is getting fooled into thinking Mateo has played well. He hasn't, he's just been lucky running into a couple home runs. That's not sustainable, and it's foolish to believe that Mateo is anything else other than the player he's shown himself to be since 2022. 

 

Mateo has a proven track record of defense as well.  And he's the fastest player on the team while Urias is most likely the slowest player on the team.  Do you watch the games?  Because Urias LOOKS bad.  He doesn't look like he's hitting into bad luck... he just looks like he can't hit.  Nearly everything with him is a groundball to the left side or a pop up.  I'm not worried about either one of them hitting HR's, but Urias looks completely feeble at the plate and has cost us multiple times in the field this year already, most recently in the game against Arizona.

Now, I too, would like you have Mayo over either.  But if we're reassigning or releasing someone to bring up Mayo, it's Urias over Mateo and it's not really close.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm worried about Cowser.  Taking pitches right down Broadway is the kind of stuff he did last season.  Either he's just guessing or he has zero confidence.  The strikeouts are piling up and he's the guy I least want to see up when you just need a productive out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I'm worried about Cowser.  Taking pitches right down Broadway is the kind of stuff he did last season.  Either he's just guessing or he has zero confidence.  The strikeouts are piling up and he's the guy I least want to see up when you just need a productive out.  

Gunnar did the same thing the first few months last year too while striking out 31% of the time through June. His xwOBACON is elite (8th in MLB among batters with 100 PA’s). He just needs to make some adjustments like Gunnar did last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LGOrioles said:

Gunnar did the same thing the first few months last year too while striking out 31% of the time through June. His xwOBACON is elite (8th in MLB among batters with 100 PA’s). He just needs to make some adjustments like Gunnar did last year. 

I agree that Cowser needs to make some adjustments. But I don't know if Gunnar is the right comparison. Gunnar Henderson is a much better/more talented player than Cowser. Gunnar's ability to adjust as soon as he did may not apply to Cowser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooks The Great said:

You say "right now" as if his production at the plate will continue. It won't, it's only going to get worse. And it's not good to begin with.

There's no reason to believe in Mateo aside from small sample size luck. He's just being given preferential treatment because he's a vet, and, similarly to Ryan McKenna, Elias refuses to cut ties with a bad player. That's not good baseball.

In what way does "right now" imply that he will continue to be this good? It implies the opposite - that he's not usually this good so let's play him while he's doing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I agree that Cowser needs to make some adjustments. But I don't know if Gunnar is the right comparison. Gunnar Henderson is a much better/more talented player than Cowser. Gunnar's ability to adjust as soon as he did may not apply to Cowser.

Gunnar is better. But there’s definitely a similarity there in terms of making hard contact and the struggles Cowser is going through right now and Gunnar went through last year.

Gunnar looked like he was guessing last year too. On this date in 2023, he had 13 looking K’s. Cowser currently has 9. 

 

Edited by LGOrioles
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TommyPickles said:

I trust Hays to play some CF.

Since 2020, he's been worth +2 DRS as a centerfielder in 274.2 innings at the position. 

In that time, Mullins has been worth +15 DRS as a centerfielder in 4,044.1 innings.

 

I'm not saying he's a better defender than Mullins. I also know there are a lot of different and imperfect stats when it comes to defense. But I think it's promising that he's averaging +1 DRS every 137 innings as a CF, considering Mullins is averaging +1 DRS every 270.

I also think Mullins will heat back up.

 

Good point.  Hays had great/elite? speed when he first got to the majors and was very good defensively.  I think he would have had no problem handling CF then.  All his injuries have diminished his speed and probably made the O's gunshy to put him in CF much.  I guess the Mateo in CF experiment is over.  He showed promise.  He made some great plays, but also missed some very makeable plays.  I guess the O;s figured the payoff wasn't worth the learning curve.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Good point.  Hays had great/elite? speed when he first got to the majors and was very good defensively.  I think he would have had no problem handling CF then.  All his injuries have diminished his speed and probably made the O's gunshy to put him in CF much.  I guess the Mateo in CF experiment is over.  He showed promise.  He made some great plays, but also missed some very makeable plays.  I guess the O;s figured the payoff wasn't worth the learning curve.

Good call.  I had to check.   Hays was up around the 90th percentile in sprint speed in both 2017 and 2019.   There was notable regression starting in 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...