Jump to content

Thursday, May 23: Orioles at White Sox


SteveA

Recommended Posts

Just now, Emory Eagle said:

His FB has had very good stuff + numbers no?

Stuff plus doesn't take command into consideration at all. Fujinami had off the charts stuff plus, but I wouldn't say he had any good pitches. I don't care how much the ball moves if he can't throw it for a strike or get outs on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beysbol said:

So, is it the hitting coaches telling them to just swing at everything? I just don’t understand. Last year they were working the count and getting walks. I’m just confused. 

This reply probably doesn’t belong in a game thread, and it’s full of opinion rather than anything that can be backed up with facts or proof.

Buuutttt, my understanding is yes, the strategy is to look only for a pitch with which you can do damage. I read in another thread that they’re using a diamond approach - avoid anything on the corners.

The problem with this is it requires a really good eye - they have to discern that the ball is heading to the corners. And count on pitchers missing the corners - which they just don’t.

So they think a pitch is coming right to them and instead get under or over or ?? but don’t square it up. And they get behind in the count quickly and strike out a lot.

This is, indeed, a completely different approach than they’ve been taught in the minors. I don’t know why. As mentioned in that other thread, we draft guys who have a good eye, but then turn them inside out when they hit the major league club. It’s baffling to me. 

Hyde has mentioned at least once that he wants the guys to be more aggressive. Welp, he’s getting what he wants. 
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roy Firestone said:

How long do we go with Santander and Mullins?

Roy this is where Hyde irritates me. Both of these guys are doing zilch on offense. I know he loves his vets but give Stowers a real shot. Bring back Kierstad and let him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Emory Eagle said:

Arm side run is good actually.  The problem is he can’t control it.  Release point, mechanics, potential injury… lots of possibilities.

If you go down a Twitter rabbit hole…(I know) Grayson is going to be injured again at some point because of how late his arm is…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

Stuff plus doesn't take command into consideration at all. Fujinami had off the charts stuff plus, but I wouldn't say he had any good pitches. I don't care how much the ball moves if he can't throw it for a strike or get outs on it.

Yeah fair enough, I don’t know if it does or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don't know if this explains the Dansby Swanson contract accurately.  Yes, he plays a premium defensive position and does it fairly well, but he was just coming off back to back seasons with 25 and 27 homers.  There was a thought that his bat was finally coming around.  He was a 1st overall pick, teams will always gamble on a guy like that, especially if there's a whiff that he could reach his full potential.  
    • My choice would be Burnes My thought is why not him And Snell AND Roki ?   We can afford it 
    • Yes. Why is this even a pressing question let alone a question at all? He's been worth 6, 3.6, 1.9, and 2.3 fWAR over the last 4 years. He's 30, final year, plays solid to excellent defense, still has plenty of speed (averaged nearly 30 SB the last 4 years), great clubhouse guy, can actually hit righties well and he'll probably end up around $9-$10m. Think you play it back w/ Cowser and Mullins in LF/CF and spend your money on a replacement Santander (O'Neill?) and another OF. 
    • And this is before the Off Season has even begun. I'll wait and see. Elias isn't going to telegraph his moves.
    • Dansby Swanson got himself 9 figures with a career 95 OPS+ because, like Cedric, he plays a premium defensive position well. And Cedric would only get the hypothetical $15 million for 2026 being discussed if he earned it because that is how club options work. To get him to even consider giving the Orioles a club option though, you would have to make it worth his while, and a $1 million dollar buyout definitely does not do so.  
    • Either would be great. I do generally like shorter term contracts because of reducing the risk. But I think I like Burnes more. Snell is 2 years older, which is why I presume you went with 4 years for him, but he does have durability concerns. If we break down each pitcher in terms of times pitching more than, say, 100 IP, 130 IP, 150 IP, and 180 IP: Burnes also hasn't been a full time starter in the majors since 2021. So, presumably, there's less wear/tear.  Think my main takeaway here is that Burnes has been a full time starter in the majors for the last 4 years and he's went 160+ in all 4 and went 190+ in 3 of them. Snell has been entirely used as a starter and has only eclipsed the 160 IP mark 3 out of 9 of his seasons and only once in the last 4 years did he go more than 130 IP.   I'd gladly take either, though.
    • I know many O's fans love Cedric.  And that is fine.   But Cedric has put up a 710 to 721 OPS for the last 3 years.    And while his defense is great not too many players with that OPS gets a 15m salary or a 5m buyout. If you step back and realize that Cedric as good as he is on defense is a platoon player with a 710 to 721 OPS he is likely to consider a club option at 11M for 2026 with a 1M buyout IMO. If you think differently please show the players with a 15m salary and that OPS.   That would be interesting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...