Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We need to prepare for LH SP playoff matchups. KC in rd 1 with Ragans. NYY in ALDS with Rodon, and Cortes. Snell, Montgomery, and Luzardo, could all be opposing pitchers too. 

Hence, why we need JD Martinez and a RH CF. 

Vs LH SP for playoffs

1. Westburg 3B R

2. Adley C S

3. JD Martinez DH R

4. Mountcastle 1B R

5. Gunnar SS L

6. Santa RF S

7. Hays LF R

8. Mateo/Norby 2B R

9. RH CF/ Pham??? R

I’ll take my chances with Mayo as DH over Martinez.

I’ve been interested in a RHH OF. Would probably prefer Taylor Ward in that case with Cowser in CF. If Hays turns it around that might not be necessary this year, but Ward would be a good add for the next few years as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Any guesses of what it would take to trade for Yimi Garcia.  This is the last year of his contract at $6 million.  I'm sure there will be plenty of competition.  Could be the dominant arm we need in the bullpen. 

I'd guess that Elias would prefer looking elsewhere, as he would not want to deal quality prospects to an AL East rival and have to face them in the years to come.  But otherwise, he'd be a good target. 

It's hard to say what the return might be. You'd be getting roughly a half season from him, so the Jays fans may be disappointed in the return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

From Buster Olney behind the ESPN.com paywall $: MLB 2024 trade deadline: Rumors, X factors to watch, more

Among the things discussed was this: 

Quote

The volatile market for relief pitchers will be robust.
The Athletics' Mason Miller is the perfect example of this: He has some injury history, but right now, he is throwing a billion miles per hour, and contenders might look at him as a difference-maker in the postseason.
"That's when the relievers are as valuable as position players," one executive said, "because they work every day and you can't win [in October] without a great bullpen performance."
The A's could keep Miller -- that's the easy conservative play -- but with reliever breakdowns at epidemic levels and teams willing to turn over their bullpens almost from year to year, Miller's value might never be higher than it is right now. Contenders will bet (and spend) on a reliever in the summer in a way they wouldn't in the winter.

Also, I'll add this from Fansided.

Quote

The Oakland Athletics are among the worst rosters in the big leagues. They truly are a wreck at this point in time, despite having a bit of success winning games early on. The front office in Oakland understands they don't have a winning roster built, so they'll actively be shopping their top names this year.
One name that's drawn attention since the beginning of the season is their dominant closer Mason Miller. Miller transitioned from a starter to the bullpen during the offseason and lit the world on fire with an insane stretch of games to begin the year. He's been among the league's best bullpen arms and he's still just 25 years old.
Oakland would be foolish to not deal him now, while he's healthy, young and under team control. MLB insider Jon Heyman has a similar view, where he listed Miller's likelihood of being traded as "fair".
Listing him as a fair chance to be traded probably has more to do with the A's not getting the package of prospects they want for him, rather than Oakland just being unwilling to move him.
I will say though, that every game Oakland waits to move him, they're taking a risk. Miller has been relatively healthy throughout his baseball career. With the state of the game today, the pitch clock, and Miller's 104 MPH fastball, it's wishful thinking to believe he'll be able to stay healthy forever.

 

Edited by Greg Pappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Fairbanks could be an interesting option. The Rays are the type of club that is less likely to be adverse to trading in-division, and traded with the Orioles previously in the 3-team Mancini deal. 

Fairbanks is under contract for 2025 with an option for 2026, so a bit more than a rental. His velo looks a little down this year, his numbers have slipped a bit and he’s had injury issues in the past, so the Rays may see it as prudent to try to cash in at the trade deadline if this looks like a lost year for them.

Meanwhile for the Orioles, there are only so many high octane RPs that will even be available, and when Fairbanks is right he’s that unhittable type shutdown RP that they’re lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Pete Fairbanks could be an interesting option. The Rays are the type of club that is less likely to be adverse to trading in-division, and traded with the Orioles previously in the 3-team Mancini deal. 

Fairbanks is under contract for 2025 with an option for 2026, so a bit more than a rental. His velo looks a little down this year, his numbers have slipped a bit and he’s had injury issues in the past, so the Rays may see it as prudent to try to cash in at the trade deadline if this looks like a lost year for them.

Meanwhile for the Orioles, there are only so many high octane RPs that will even be available, and when Fairbanks is right he’s that unhittable type shutdown RP that they’re lacking.

I don't hate it. 2.35 FIP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow there's no way I'm trading Norby for 1/2 a season of Tanner Scott. If we get him AND Luzardo the package would include Norby sure.

Also, I don't think the Orioles will go the route of JD Martinez, who would basically take up a roster spot to only DH against LH and pinch hit (I.E. no fielding value at all).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, G54377 said:

Wow there's no way I'm trading Norby for 1/2 a season of Tanner Scott. If we get him AND Luzardo the package would include Norby sure.

Also, I don't think the Orioles will go the route of JD Martinez, who would basically take up a roster spot to only DH against LH and pinch hit (I.E. no fielding value at all).

Do you think you can get more for Norby, or do you actually think he has a future here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We have to close the gap between our pen and the Yankees pen for a potential ALCS showdown. 

You and I don’t agree on much. But I definitely agree with you on this.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Do you think you can get more for Norby, or do you actually think he has a future here?

Both, although he's most likely traded. Or at least, that's probably the route we need to take. Shipping him out for 1/2 season of a guy with a 1.25 WHIP and 3.77 FIP doesn't sound like a good plan to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cuellar35 said:

The biggest problem will be the number of buyers compared to the number of sellers.  And all the buyers want the same thing.  Trust the process and don't make trades just for the sake of making one.  I like this team and what the future holds.  Under NO circumstances trade Holliday, Basallo or Mayo.

Elias will be uber cautious/extremely conservative as always, so we don’t need to worry about that.

However, I don’t agree that we should be as dogmatic about that list of 3. If we have a chance to acquire a player/piece who is the last piece to the championship puzzle AND can help us for future seasons. I would be open to surrendering one of Basallo or Mayo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Amparo made it to at least 49 PA with a strikeout but he went down once yesterday so the no K streaks are over.  Felix Amparo just edged out Adriander Mejia for the most PA without striking out.
    • they could also reward batting discipline by forcing pitchers to throw real strikes with at least a robo challenge system
    • Perfect, let’s go get him AND Verlander! 
    • I didn’t catch it myself but someone pointed out that Matthew Etzel did not make the top 45.   That’s either an oversight or just plain ridiculous.
    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
    • I get that McCann’s bat is not ideal in the lineup (on the days that he plays). And Mullins struggled really bad for about 6-7 weeks. And Mateo/Urias are no great shakes themselves. But even with all/each of them getting regular to semi-regular ABs, we have the #1 offense in the sport. Like it literally doesn’t get any better. So how do we “need” another bat. Maybe if Mayo is still here, he comes up at some point and strengthens us even more? But I struggle to understand the idea of us needing more offense, especially when the pitching is this shaky. Do you want Cano (who know looks like he’s lost it) and Perez coming in to try to hold games in the 7th/8th inning only to turn it over to Kimbrel in the 9th in October?  Maybe we defeat SEA/NY and reach a World Series for the first time in over 40 years. How would you like our chances of potentially Ranger Suarez vs Irvin/Kremer/Suarez/Povich for 2 times in a potential 7 game series? Seems like the Phills would have a strong advantage there, no?
    • I'm guessing that without a major technological breakthrough we're getting the 2024 version. Which, in the absence of other information, is his career averages with a bit of age-related decline thrown in. I'm assuming the year-to-year variation we see in his record is mostly random noise overlaid on his basic talent level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...