Jump to content

Nolan Hoffman has 15 straight scoreless IP in AAA. What do we make of him?


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Good thread.  I hadn’t realized he was on a roll like this.  Hopefully, he keeps it up.  Definitely an option this year and next.

Yup. So what I’m thinking is he’s always going to carry a high BABIP because he induces a lot of grounders. That’s .349 in AAA. How much does that go down with our elite IF defense?

No homers allowed. In fact, he’s only given up 17 fly balls in 28.1 IP this season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been intrigued by him since we drafted him. The k rate and ground ball rate is nice. Still a pretty high walk rate (5+ per 9). I wouldn’t mind him getting a look at some point, similar to krook, just to see how his stuff plays. We don’t have a ton of high k guys in the pen. His ability to provide length isn’t a bad thing either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More of a right-handed sidearmer specialist, he has to be pretty pinpoint in his location to defend himself against lefties. He's a sinker, curveball guy (occasional change) who has some late movement and seems to keep himself off the barrels for the most part, but nothing is plus. 

Because he comes from an orthodox angle, he gives batters a different look than they're used to seeing, but I just don't see him as much more than an up down guy who you can use in low leverage. His 54% GB rate is ok, but that will go down at the major league level, so it's not like he'd be a huge ground ball guy there.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

Nice that he is on a streak but he has to do a lot more to be protected this off season.  His 1.624 WHIP needs to go down substantially.

It’s hard to judge relievers by overall numbers. If you’re thinking about calling them up then you need to look at what have you done lately. Baker, Vespi, Suarez, and Means, all looked much better than their AAA overall stat line. 

The thing I like about Hoffman is that he’s going multiple innings now. I’d protect him, and with the way we’re developing guys we won’t have to hit the waiver wire for depth unless we really like a player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Nah man. Sorry you may not agree with me, but I'm definitely not that guy.
    • I'm not sure if it's been posted or not but his RC+ at 19 in AA is up there with names like Soto, Acuna, Holliday, Camineiro.   I think we have arguably 3 of the top 5-7 prospects in baseball with Holliday, Mayo, and Basallo.  
    • I don't think Basallo is untouchable.   You just don't trade him unless you are getting a no. 1-2 starter with several years of control remaining. I expect him to be a very good major league hitter but still worry about his defense.  I picked this up from the Fangraphs org review yesterday: "His arm strength is great and there were times last year when it looked incredible, but Basallo has been popping closer to 1.95 so far this year and his footwork is often pretty sloppy. As is true of a lot of catchers his age, he could stand to be more accurate and consistent coming out of his crouch. His receiving isn’t good, but it isn’t so terrible that it damns him to first base. His ball blocking might though, and it’s this area of Basallo’s game that most needs to improve. If this skill doesn’t progress, or if his size quickly forces him to move out from behind the plate, then his issues with chase would suddenly become more of a problem, though we’re probably still talking about a strong enough hit/power combo for Basallo to be an everyday first baseman." Basallo is young enough that he may overcome his defensive shortcomings and remain at C, but that remains a real risk for me.
    • I think that goes both ways though. He was playing pro ball under pro instruction at 16 when the US guys were playing HS varsity and still years away from pro instruction. The travel ball system in the US is extremely flawed. The kids live to play baseball in other countries and they DO have baseball resources available...how else could he have been on a MLB teams radar at 15 years old?
    • Agreed. I expect to see him sometime next season. Start with one of AAA catchers as a Backup and then move them along when Basallo is ready about this time next season.
    • Age at level is just one column on the statsheet, but it's maybe THE most substantial one to look at.  I understand the question you're asking in this thread. I think the argument SG and others are making could be said more gently as, you're acknowledging but still underrating how important the age aspect really is. Good performance at younger-than-level ages isn't just a nice feature, it's a huge indicator of future greatness. 
    • I think we go to a semi 6 man rotation and try and line up our rotation with that Yankees series right before the break.  I think in the 2nd half we'll see a 6 man rotation sometimes with the goal being to keep Burnes and Grayson rested for the playoffs.  Definitely 6 man if we get a vet like Scherzer.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...